• Rail M. Shamionov, Dr Faculty of Psychological, Pedagogical and Special Education, Saratov State University, Saratov
  • Anton V. Grigoryev, Dr. Faculty of Psychological, Pedagogical and Special Education, Saratov State University, Saratov
Keywords: personality, representations, image, socially-active individual, cognitive complexity


The study of students’ representations of a socially active individual is one of the major tasks of psychology of education. The purpose of the study is to carry out analysis of characteristics of an image of a socially active individual in the representations of student youth and to correlate them with self-assessment of social activity and assessment of real social activity. Students aged 17-23 years (n=251) took part in the study М=20.11, SD=1.2 (41% men). We used the polling method with the scales developed by the authors of the present study in order to identify self-assessment of social activity, to evaluate real activity; and the associative experiment method. In the study we analysed qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the image of a socially-active individual in the representations of university students. We have established major meaningful characteristics of representations (personal qualities, self-improvement and personal transformation, states, representation in the group, process and activity-related characteristics). Conclusion has been made about the connection between the intensity of students’ social activity and cognitive complexity of the image of a socially active individual and the content of subjective (initiative, confidence) and psychodynamic (vigour) categories in it.


Download data is not yet available.


Arapova, O. I., & Dolgova, M. V. (2017). Cross-cultural differences in representation of basic emotions. Juvenis scientia, 6, 70-73.

Batel, S., & Castro, P. (2018). Reopening the dialogue between the theory of social representations and discursive psychology for examining the construction and transformation of meaning in discourse and communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(4), 732-753

Brown, C. L., Gibbons, L. E., Kennison, R. F., Robitaille, A., Lindwall, M., Mitchell, M. B., ... & MacDonald, S. W. (2012). Social activity and cognitive functioning over time: a coordinated analysis of four longitudinal studies. Journal of Aging Research, 2012.

Eysenk, M.W. (2015). Anxiety: The cognitive perspective. Psychology Press, New York.

Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) (2018). Education.

Grigorieva, M. V. (2018). Types of Adaptive Personality Readiness in the School Learning Environment. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Ser. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 7(1), 56-61.

Gruter, T., Takeda, A., Rohde, H., & Schafer A. J. (2018). Intersentential coreference expectations reflect mental models of events. Cognition. 177, 172-176.

Jackendoff, R. S. (2017). In Defense of Theory. Cognitive Science, 41(S2), 185–212.

Jackendoff, R. S. (2016). Morphological Schemas: Theoretical and Psycholinguistic Issues. The Mental Lexicon, 11(3), 467-493.

Levine, S., Leslie, A. M., & Mikhail, J. (2018). The Mental Representation of Human Action. Cognitive science, 42(4), 1229-1264.

Lewin, K. (2000). Field theory in social Sciences. Piter, Saint-Petersburg.

Markova, L (2016). The Dialogical Mind: Common Sense and Ethics, Cambridge University Press,

Moscovici, S. (2000). Social Representations: Explorations in Social Psychology. Polity Press, Cambridge.

Petrenko, V. F. (2016). Methodological manifesto of psychosemantics. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 37(3), 5-14.

Piaget, J. (2004). Psychology of intelligence. Piter, Saint-Petersburg.

Pilipenko, A. I. (2017). Actual cognitive representation of students. Problems of Economics and law, 111, 41-46.

Richard, Zh. F. (1998). Mental activity. Understanding, reasoning, finding solutions. Institute of psychology RAS, Moscow.

Samoylenko, E. S., & Bogdanova, I. V. (2017). Modern ideas about types of knowledge and experience in psychological research of the problem of their capitalization. Experimental psychology, 10(4), 74-95.

Sergienko, E. A. (2017). Realization of the principle of development in the psychology of subject. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 38(2), 5-18.

Shamionov, R. M. (2014). Adaptational potential аnd subjective well-being jf comprehensive school graduates and first year students оf higher educational institutions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 131, 51-56.

Shamionov, R. M. (2017). Attitude to change and tolerance to uncertainty as predictors of adaptability and adaptive readiness. Russian psychological journal, 14(2), 90-104.

Velichkovsky, B. M. (2017). Cognitive science the art and its implications. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. 10(3), 2-6.

Zhdanova, S. Yu., Pecherkina, A. V., & Strokanov, A. A. (2017). The Structure of Happiness Representation for Russian and American Representatives. The Education and Science Journal, 19(7), 77-96.

How to Cite
M. Shamionov, R., & V. Grigoryev, A. (2019). THE IMAGE OF SOCIALLY ACTIVE INDIVIDUAL IN THE REPRESENTATIONS OF STUDENT YOUTH. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 7(1), 15-20.