IDENTIFICATION OF COGNITIVE MANIPULATIONS THAT HAVE THE GREATEST IMPACT ON STUDENTS IN THE INTERNET

Abstract

The study puts an emphasis on exploring cognitive manipulations contained in the Internet resources (social networks and blogs) that have the greatest impact on students. The study was conducted with 159 students of Don State Technical University. 50 samples of media texts (of various formats) containing cognitive manipulation were taken from social networks sites and blogs. Focus group method, questionnaire, method of Critical Discourse Analysis and methods of mathematical statistics (Principal Component Analysis) were used for data collection and processing. The findings allow us to identify and describe the features of such cognitive manipulation as “presence effect”, “focus on pros”, “halo effect”, “emotional resonance”, “ambiguous language”, “anonymous authority”, “primacy effect”, “exaggeration” and identify the manipulations that have the greatest impact on students. Recommendations aimed at reduction of the impact of manipulative techniques were suggested. The results of the present study may help teachers and psychologists in their work.

Keywords: cognitive manipulation, critical thinking, critical discourse analysis, mass medium, Internet, social network

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asmolov, A. G. (2009). From we-media to I-media: Identity transformations in the virtual world. Psychology in Russia: State of the art, 2(1). https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/doaj/20746857/2009/00000001/00000002/art00007

Burgoon, J. K., Blair, J. P., & Strom, R. E. (2008). Cognitive biases and nonverbal cue availability in detecting deception. Human Communication Research, 34(4), 572-599. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00333.x

Chumakova, V. V., & Daineko V. V. (2015). Cifrovye obrazovatel’nye resursy i kognitivnye manipulyacii v obuchenii [Digital educational resources and cognitive manipulation in training]. Izvestiya VGPU. Pedagogicheskie nauki [News of VSPU. Pedagogical science]. 2(267), 41-44. http://izvestia.vspu.ac.ru/izvestia_2015_v267_N2.html

Demyankov, V. Z. (2017). Transfer znanij i kognitivnaya manipulyaciya [Knowledge transfer and cognitive manipulation]. Voprosy kognitivnoj lingvistiki [Issues of Cognitiv Lingvistics], 4, 5-13. https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-20

Dzyaloshinsky I. M. (2005). Manipulyativ nye tekhnologii v mass-media [Manipulative techniques in mass media]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Zhurnalistika [Bulletin of Moscow University. Journalism], 10, 56-76. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11750051

Facione P. A. (2013). Critical Thinking: What it is and Why it Counts. Measured Reasons and the California Academic Press, Millbrae.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. Boston: Addison Wesley.

Hovland, C. I. (1954). The Effects of the Mass Media of Communication In Handbook of Social Psychology 2(2), 1062-1103 by Carl I. Hovland edited by Gardner Lindzey http://www.citeulike.org/group/14507/article/9360718

Kandyba, V. M. (2004). Technique of hypnosis in reality. The technique of a hidden human control. Saint-Petersburg: Lan’.

Kara-Murza S. G. (2004). Manipulation of consciousness. Moscow: Algorithm. (In Russian).

Klooster, D. (2001). What is critical thinking. Thinking Classroom, 4, 36-40.

Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., & Staksrud, E. (2018). European research on children’s internet use: Assessing the past and anticipating the future. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1103-1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816685930

Livingstone, S., & Third, A. (2017). Children and young people’s rights in the digital age: An emerging agenda. New Media & Society, 19(5), 657–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686318

Maillat, D. & Oswald, S. (2011). “Constraining context: a pragmatic account of cognitive manipulation”. In Hart, Christopher (ed.).Critical discourse studies in context and cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 65-80. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.43

Mikhaleva, O. L. (2009). Political discourse. The specificity of manipulative influence. Moscow: “LIBROKOM”. (In Russian).

Novković-Cvetković, B., & Stanojević D. (2018). Integrating digital technologies into teaching process. Teme, 42(4), 1219-1233. https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME1804219N

Sperber, D., Cara, F., & Girotto, V. (1995). Relevance theory explains the selection task. Cognition, 57(1), 31-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00666-M

Stanković, Z., Maksimović, J., & Osmanović, J. (2018). Cognitive theories and paradigmatic research posts in the function of multimedia teaching and learning. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education/IJCRSEE, 6(2), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1802107S

Stanojevic, D. M., Cenić, D., & Cenić, S. (2018). Application of computers in modernization of teaching science. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education:(IJCRSEE), 6(2), 89-106.https://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1802089S

Stošić, L., & Stosic, I. (2013). Diffusion of innovation in modern school. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education:(IJCRSEE), 1(1), 5-13. http://www.ijcrsee.com/index.php/ijcrsee/article/view/7

Sukhanov, Y. Y. (2018). Political discourse as object of linguistic analysis. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 9(1), 200-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2018-9-1-200-212

Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359-383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250

Voiskounsky, A. E. (2010). Internet addiction in the context of positive psychology. Psychology in Russia: state of the art, 3, 541-549. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2010.0026

Wodak, R. (2006). Mediation between discourse and society: assessing cognitive approaches in CDA. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059566

Zelinsky S.A. (2014). Manipulation of the masses and psychoanalysis. CANADA.: Altaspera Publishing & Literary Agency Inc. 396. http://lit.lib.ru/z/zelinskij_s_a/text_0430-1.shtml

Zhdanko, A. P. (2018). Identifying extremist behaviour in youtube comments and the formation of anty-extremist values. Paper presented at the 5th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2018. Vienna, Austria. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2018H/11

Internet sources:

https://twitter.com/navalny

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgxTPTFbIbCWfTR9I2-5SeQ

https://navalny.com/

https://www.instagram.com/navalny/

https://twitter.com/klichqotes

Published
2019-04-20
How to Cite
Zhdanko, A. (2019). IDENTIFICATION OF COGNITIVE MANIPULATIONS THAT HAVE THE GREATEST IMPACT ON STUDENTS IN THE INTERNET. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 7(1), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1901035Z