THE METHOD OF DESTRUCTIVE SCENARIO FORECASTING FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF DIVERGENT THINKING OF MANAGERS

Keywords: education, divergent thinking, scenario forecasting, method of destructive scenario, forecasting

Abstract

The phenomenon of thinking is well studied in psychology, and many of its types are revealed. However, little attention is paid to the development of divergent thinking in general and the development of divergent thinking of managers in particular. At the same time, multidirectional management decisions, their prompt adoption and the originality of content are very necessary for enterprises. The aim of the article is to give the characteristic of divergent thinking, to note its features and to present own definition of the concept “divergent thinking of managers”. In the article the analysis of one of the functions of managers, that is forecasting, is described. The scenario method and a new method of destructive scenario forecasting are proposed. The algorithm of the last method application in the form of a technological map is shown. The result of using the method for 2 years on specialized programs of professional development and retraining of managers is described. The results of mathematical processing of the obtained data on diagnostic procedures are presented. They testify that in the experimental groups the development of qualitative characteristics of divergent thinking of managers proceeded more intensively than in the control ones, in which the method of destructive scenario forecasting was not used. That proves the effectiveness of the proposed method for the development of divergent thinking of managers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Metrics

References

Acar, S. & Runco, M. A. (2015). Thinking in multiple directions: Hyperspace categories in divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 9(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038501

Ananiev, B. G. (2001). On the problems of modern human science. St. Petersburg: Peter.

Arnheim, R. (2001). What it means to be creative. British Journal of Aesthetics, 41(1), 24–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/41.1.24

Bailey, K. G. D., Rembold, L. & Abreu, Ch. M. (2019). Critical thinking dispositions and skills in the undergraduate research methods classroom. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000158

Brushlinsky, A.V. & Tikhomirov, O.K. (2013). On the development trends of modern psychology of thinking. National Psychological Journal, 2(10), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.11621npj.2013.0201

Darwin, Ch. (1998). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life? Hertsfordshire: Wordsworth Editions Limited.

Dorfman, L. Ya. (2015). Creative mental field, divergence and variability. Psychological Journal, 36(6), 5–11.

Dweck, C. (2006) Mindset: the new psychology of success. New York: Random House Publishing Group.

Guilford, J. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

James, M. & Koller, T. (2000). Emerging markets: features of company valuation. TheMcKinseyQuarterly. № 4, 7–11.

Katrenko, M. V., Nebytova, L. A. & Sasin, A. A. (2018). Creative thinking of students. Divergence. Bulletin of modern research. 11.7(26), 117–119.

Lee, C. S. & Therriault, D. J. (2013). The cognitive underpinnings of creative thought: A latent variable analysis exploring the roles of intelligence and working memory in three creative thinking processes. Intelligence, 41(5), 306–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.008

Lindsay, G., Hull, K. S. & Thomson, R. F. (2001) Creative and Critical Thinking. St. Petersburg: Peter. http://www.psychology-online.net/articles/doc-73.html

Lucas, B. & Hanson, J. (2016) Thinking Like an Engineer: Using Engineering Habits of Mind and Signature Pedagogies to Redesign Engineering. IJEP, 6(2), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v6i2.5366

Maslow, A. H. (1967). A theory of metamotivation: the biological rooting of the value-life. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 7(2), 93–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/002216786700700201

Matyushkina, A. A. (2018) Understanding the Problem Situation and its Successful Solution. Izvestia Saratov University. Educational Acmeology.Developmental Psychology, 7(25), 62–67. https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-20187-1-62-67

Mill, J. St. (2020). The syllogistic and inductive logic system: statement of principles of evidence in connection with research methods. Moscow: Lenand.

Neisser, U. (2004). The development of memory: new questions and old. Developmental Review, 24(1), 154–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2003.09.002.

Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. New York: Viking press. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175382

Riegel, K. F. (1976). The dialectics of human development. American Psychologist, 31(10), 689–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X. 31.10.689

Schneider, A. B. (2007). Experimental psychology. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt.

Torrance, E. P. (1993). Understanding Creativity: Where to Start? Psychological Inquiry, 4(3), 232–234. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0403_17

Veraksa, N. E. (2019). Dialectical thinking: logic and psychology. Cultural-historical psychology, 15(3), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2019150301

Wallace, A. R. Contributions to the Theory of Natural Selection (2013). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.1254

Wertheimer, M. (1945). Productive Thinking. New York: Harper and Brothers, https://doi.org/10.1177/000271624725000171

Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as Action. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195117530.001.0001

Published
2020-04-20
How to Cite
Rezanovich, I., Rezanovich, A., Piatkova Marina , M., & Peredrienko, T. (2020). THE METHOD OF DESTRUCTIVE SCENARIO FORECASTING FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF DIVERGENT THINKING OF MANAGERS. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 8(1), 61-67. https://doi.org/10.5937/IJCRSEE2001061R