www.ijcrsee.com
129
Ivleva, V., & Kairys, A. (2023). The Associations Between Personality Traits, Leisure Activities, and Memory Performance in
Older Adulthood, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 11(1), 129-
141.
Introduction
During recent decades, the global population has rapidly become an ageing one. Because of this,
cognitive functioning and age-related cognitive changes, especially the deterioration of memory, have
become some of the most signicant concerns of modern society (Park and Festini, 2017; Cadar et
al., 2017). Memory not only provides opportunities to learn new things and properly function in everyday
life, but also allows individuals to accumulate memories of their experiences that are important for shaping
and preserving a sense of identity (Erber, 2012). There is evidence that even a minor decline in memory
reduces a person’s independence (Ikeda et al., 2019). Therefore, memory impairment can become
not only a cause of mundane day-to-day issues due to forgetting important tasks, but can also cause
emotional suffering and have a negative impact on relatives and carers. The reduction in independence
due to memory impairment can also cause indirect losses to a country’s economy (Chaves et al., 2015;
Hock et al., 2014).
Memory consists of various systems, and not all of them undergo age-related changes. According
to some studies, the working and episodic memory systems are particularly sensitive to aging processes
(Nyberg et al., 2012). The deterioration of these systems is an individual process, and may depend on a
series of different factors. These changes are mainly associated with education, IQ, and professional and
leisure activities. Studies show that people with higher levels of education, IQ, and professional activity
have a better memory capacity in later adulthood and exhibit less age-related memory decline (Stern,
2002, 2009). These relationships are often explained by the cognitive reserve hypothesis, which states
that there are interpersonal differences in how individuals are able to cope with neuropathology (Stern,
2002, 2009; Newton et al., 2016). It is assumed that the education, professional experience, and leisure
and social activities that a person has acquired—as well as other possible factors—enable compensatory
cognitive strategies at the onset of age-related cognitive decline or other neurodegenerative processes
(Walker and Tesco, 2013; Stern, 2002; Newton et al., 2016), and ensure better memory capacity in later
adulthood. Current studies provide evidence to conrm this assumption by shedding more light on the role
The Associations Between Personality Traits, Leisure Activities, and
Memory Performance in Older Adulthood
Viktorija Ivleva
1*
, Antanas Kairys
1
1
Institute of Psychology, Vilnius university, Lithuania
e-mail: viktorija.ivleva@fsf.vu.lt, antanas.kairys@fsf.vu.lt
Abstract: The present study examines the links between personality traits, leisure activities, and memory in older adults
after controlling for leisure activities and demographic factors. The research sample consisted of 24,930 individuals aged 65
to 101 years from 27 European countries (43.2% men and 56.8% women). Data from the 7
th
Wave of the Survey of Health,
Ageing, and Retirement in Europe was analyzed. Memory was assessed using a modied version of Rey’s Auditory Verbal
Learning Test (RAVLT). Personality traits were assessed using the BFI-10 Personality Traits Questionnaire. Data analysis
revealed that personality traits such as openness to experience and neuroticism allow for the prediction of memory capacity in
older adulthood. These relationships remained signicant even after controlling for cognitively stimulating leisure activities and
age. These results show that personality traits such as neuroticism and openness to experience might be valuable in predicting
memory functioning among older adults.
Keywords: personality traits, memory, leisure activities, older adults, SHARE.
Original scientic paper
Received: February, 21.2023.
Revised: March, 29.2023.
Accepted: April, 10.2023.
UDK:
159.953.072-053.9(4)
159.922.63(4)
10.23947/2334-8496-2023-11-1-129-141
© 2023 by the authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
*
Corresponding author: viktorija.ivleva@fsf.vu.lt
www.ijcrsee.com
130
Ivleva, V., & Kairys, A. (2023). The Associations Between Personality Traits, Leisure Activities, and Memory Performance in
Older Adulthood, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 11(1), 129-
141.
of leisure activities (Litwin, Schwarts and Noam Damri, 2017; Adam et al., 2013; Mousavi-Nasab, Kormi-
Nouri and Nilsson, 2014). It is hypothesized that various activities might be associated with formation and
preservation of cognitive reserve (Adam et al., 2013; Stern, 2002, 2009).
Recent research shows that personality traits may also be associated with memory in later
adulthood, and are considered to be contributing factors in building a cognitive reserve (Klaming, Veltman
and Comijs, 2016; Soubelet and Salthouse, 2011; Hill et al., 2014; Leavitt et al., 2017). Personality shapes
how a person copes with various challenges throughout their life and, accordingly, engages in a variety
of activities or behaviors (Newton et al., 2016; Jackson et al., 2019) that may be directly related to brain
health (Klaming, Veltman and Comijs, 2016; Curtis, Windsor and Soubelet, 2015).
To assess the relationship between cognitive abilities—including memory—and personality, the Big
Five model is most commonly used. The model states that there are ve universal personality traits common
for each individual—neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness (Costa
and McCrae, 1992; Rammstedt, Lechner and Danner, 2018). Usually, neuroticism is most commonly
associated with memory and other cognitive abilities. High levels of neuroticism are associated with poorer
cognitive abilities and faster, as well as more abrupt, cognitive decline over the course of an individual’s
life (Stephan et al., 2020; Maldonato et al., 2017; Luchetti et al., 2016; Curtis, Windsor and Soubelet,
2015; Sutin et al., 2019). This relationship is primarily explained by behavioral aspects: personality traits
might have an impact on a person’s dietary choices, drug use, adherence to treatment instructions, etc.
(Terracciano et al., 2008; Mõttus et al., 2012; Axelsson et al., 2011). Individuals with higher levels of
neuroticism are more likely to choose an unhealthy lifestyle due to weaker impulse control, not follow
treatment instructions, and experience sleep disorders (Terracciano and Costa, 2004; Sutin et al., 2016;
Lahey, 2009; Duggan et al., 2014). Factors such as these have an adverse effect on brain health and,
consequently, on memory abilities (Boyle et al., 2010). The relationship between memory and personality
can also be explained by neurophysiological mechanisms. Individuals with higher levels of neuroticism
are more likely to experience stronger emotions when faced with stressful situations. Therefore, their
blood cortisol level is usually higher than that of less neurotic individuals (Hock et al., 2014). Increased
emotional sensitivity eventually damages neural connections in the brain, and is associated with a
decrease in cortical volume in the frontal lobe area and a faster loss of gray matter (Hock et al., 2014;
Klaming, Veltman and Comijs, 2016; Jackson, Balota and Head, 2011).
There is also evidence to indicate links between memory and openness (Luchetti et al., 2016; Leavitt
et al., 2017; Weinstein et al., 2019; Stephan et al., 2020). Studies show (Stephan et al., 2020; Leavitt et
al., 2017), that a higher level of openness is associated with better memory and a lower risk of memory
impairment regardless of age, education, or IQ. However, the exact mechanism of this relationship is
still unclear, and the relationship itself is sometimes considered to be indirect. People who are open
to new experiences are more likely to engage in a variety of mentally engaging activities (Schwaba
et al., 2018; Stephan et al., 2020; Jackson et al., 2019), and often pursue higher education—which is
frequently linked to better cognitive capacity (Chapman et al., 2012; Jackson et al., 2019). Other studies
point out that higher level of openness is also linked to more physically active life-style and healthier
eating patterns (Sutin et al., 2016), which are known to benet memory performance in older adulthood
(Schott and Krull, 2019). There is also evidence to suggest that openness to new experiences may be
associated with neurophysiological mechanisms—for example, dopamine neurotransmitters (Maldonato
et al., 2017). Dopamine is one of the physiological factors that stimulates human action while inuencing
cognitive processes (Maldonato et al., 2017). Despite these ndings, there are studies that show negative
correlations or no correlations at all between memory and openness (Uttl et al., 2013; Waris et al., 2018).
Some studies show positive associations between memory and the trait of extraversion. Higher
levels of extraversion are associated with better memory, especially long-term memory (Meier, Perrig-
Chiello and Perrig, 2002; Graham and Lachman, 2014; Maldonato et al., 2017). Extraversion is often
seen as a propensity toward greater social stimulation (Newton et al., 2016). This means that extroverted
individuals are more likely to engage in various activities, communicate with others, explore new places,
and so forth. Existing studies conrm this assumption (Stephan et al., 2020; Newton et al., 2016).
This provides opportunities to gain miscellaneous experience that is associated with better memory
performance. These links can also be explained by some neurophysiological studies. Extroverts are
considered to be individuals who show more optimistic attitudes, and to seek to cultivate more positive
emotions in their environment. It is assumed that if the process of encoding information (i.e. remembering
something) is accompanied by positive emotions, then certain markers—which are stored together with
the so-called memory trace (a hypothetical constant change in the nervous system that occurs when
someone remembers something)—are formed in the brain. These markers then enhance the retrieval of a
particular memory. In other words, certain information becomes easier to remember (Curtis, Windsor and
www.ijcrsee.com
131
Ivleva, V., & Kairys, A. (2023). The Associations Between Personality Traits, Leisure Activities, and Memory Performance in
Older Adulthood, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 11(1), 129-
141.
Soubelet, 2015). However, just as is the case with openness, some studies show the opposite association
between extraversion and memory (Luchetti et al., 2016; Chapman et al., 2012).
There is little evidence to link the trait of conscientiousness to memory abilities, and results in
this vein are scarce and contradictory. On the one hand, positive correlations are found between
conscientiousness and memory (Luchetti et al., 2016; Leavitt et al., 2017; Sutin et al., 2019). On the
other hand, some researchers provide data showing that the relationship between conscientiousness and
cognitive abilities is a negative one (Chapman et al., 2012; Waris et al., 2018). Currently, evidence to link
the personality trait of agreeableness to memory is also lacking. Several studies show weak links between
agreeableness and better memory (Hock et al., 2014), and yet, according to other studies, no signicant
associations are found (Luchetti et al., 2016).
Despite various studies, the question remains as to what level of inuence personality traits have
on changes in memory over the course of life, and, if an inuence is present, how this is exerted. Some
studies show that there are associations between some personality traits and faster cognitive decline,
weaker cognitive abilities in general, and an increased likelihood of dementia in old age (Hock et al., 2014;
Luchetti et al., 2016; Boyle et al., 2010; Duberstein et al., 2011). On the other hand, not all studies provide
such results (Wetherell et al., 2002).
In the current study, we aimed to examine the links between personality traits and memory
performance in older adults after controlling for leisure activities and demographic factors. We used the
data from the 7
th
Wave of the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe. Correlation coefcients
were calculated to assess the links between personality traits, memory, and leisure activities. Hierarchical
multiple regression models were constructed to assess the prognostic value of personality traits on
memory performance in older adulthood over and above the demographic and leisure activity factors. It
was expected that memory capacity and such personality traits as extroversion, neuroticism and openess
to experience will be signicantly related. Involvement in leisure activities was also expected to be related
to memory capacity in older adulthood. Finally, It was expected that personality activities will allow for the
prediction of memory capacity in older adulthood even after controlling for cognitively stimulating leisure
activities and other demographic factors.
Materials and Methods
Study design
This study was conducted using data from the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe
(SHARE), which has been performed every two years since 2004. SHARE involves more than 140,000
people aged 50 and above from 27 European countries and Israel (Bergmann et al., 2019a, 2019b).
Survey materials are administered as a Computer Assisted Personal Interview (CAPI), supplemented by
a paper questionnaire. The questions cover various socioeconomic, health-related, and psychological
variables, and interviews are conducted in respondents’ homes, lasting approximately 90 minutes. Data
collection was approved by the internal review board of the University of Mannheim, Germany (until 2011),
and by the Ethics Council of the Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science (2011 onward).
Participants
Data for the present study has been drawn from the 7
th
wave of SHARE (Börsch-Supan, 2019;
Börsch-Supan et al., 2013; Bergmann et al., 2019b). To increase the reliability of results, subjects with
neurological diseases (Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease) or comorbidities that may affect cognitive
abilities (cancer, affective disorders, etc.) were excluded from the sample. Therefore, the nal analytic
sample consisted of 24,930 individuals from following countries: Austria (N = 1363), Germany (N = 629),
Sweden (N = 1036), Spain (N = 1130), Italy (N = 1549), France (N = 1320), Denmark (N = 822), Greece
(N = 1393), Switzerland (N = 1136), Belgium (N = 1590), Israel (N = 661), Czech Republic (N = 1426),
Poland (N = 1315), Luxembourg (N = 139), Hungary (N = 628), Portugal (N = 141), Slovenia (N = 1198),
Estonia (N = 1951), Croatia (N = 764), Lithuania (N = 631), Bulgaria (N =772), Cyprus (N = 470), Finland
(N = 613), Latvia (N = 631), Malta (N = 461), Romania (N = 704), and Slovakia (N = 528). The age of the
participants was 65 to 101 years (M = 73.67; SD = 6.74), 43% of participants were men, and 56.8% were
women. Of the participants, 67.1% were married and cohabited, 1.0% lived in a partnership, 1.1% were
married but did not cohabit, 3.9% were single, 6.9% divorced, and 20.0% widowed.
www.ijcrsee.com
132
Ivleva, V., & Kairys, A. (2023). The Associations Between Personality Traits, Leisure Activities, and Memory Performance in
Older Adulthood, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 11(1), 129-
141.
Variables
Memory was selected as a dependent variable, which consisted of two measures: immediate and
delayed recall. Memory was assessed using a modied version of Rey’s Auditory Verbal Learning Test
(RAVLT), which is designed to evaluate working memory (Dal Bianco, Garrouste and Paccagnella, 2013;
Litwin, Schwartz and Damri, 2017) and is also used to evaluate episodic memory (Cheke and Clayton,
2013). In the modied version of the test, participants were asked to remember as many words as possible
from a list of ten words, which was read by a researcher. After 5–10 minutes, participants were asked
to remember as many words as possible from the list read earlier. Each respondent’s score was then
calculated from 0 to 10 based on the number of correct responses.
Personality traits were chosen as independent variables, and leisure activities were selected as
control variables. Personality assessment was based on the Big Five model (Sutin et al., 2019), which
states that there are ve universal dimensions of personality traits for all people: neuroticism (shows a
person’s tendency to experience negative feelings and is associated with less emotional stability and
resistance to stress); extraversion (related to a person’s sociability, activity, propensity to communicate a
lot, optimism, and arousal); openness to experience (associated with a person’s aesthetic sensitivity, desire
for knowledge, propensity for creativity, and curiosity); agreeableness (dened by a person’s modesty,
ability to understand and empathize with others, efforts to help, and altruism); and conscientiousness
(includes personal control and discipline, ability to plan, organize, set goals and objectives, and the need
to achieve something new) (Costa and McCrae, 1992). Personality traits were assessed using the BFI-
10 Personality Traits Questionnaire (Sutin et al., 2019). This version of the questionnaire is based on the
longer Big Five Inventory 44 (BFI-44), and is often used in studies covering a wide range of factors with
limited research opportunities due to a lack of time or other restricting circumstances. The BFI-10 consists
of only 10 questions, where each trait is assessed with two questions on the Likert scale ranging from 1
(strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). To ensure the reliability of the questionnaire, the comparability
between BFI-10 and BFI-44 has been assessed by its creators. Signicant and strong correlations
ranging from r = 0.74 (agreeableness) to r = 0.89 (extraversion) were found. Test–retest results were also
satisfactory—correlations between r = 0.65 (openness) and r = 0.79 (extraversion) were identied over a
period of 6 to 8 weeks in a sample of American students. Research shows that the BFI-10, even with very
few questions, has satisfactory psychometric characteristics, and is therefore a suitable tool for measuring
personality traits (Sutin et al., 2019). To test the internal consistency of the BFI-10 in the present sample,
Cronbach’s alpha was calculated for each personality trait as follows: neuroticism = 0.30; agreeableness
= 0.20; extraversion = 0.43; conscientiousness = 0.41; and openness = 0.18.
Participation in leisure activities was assessed by asking respondents if they had taken part in any
of the following activities in the past year: voluntary or charity work; educational or training courses; sport,
social, or other similar clubs; political or community-related organizations; word or number games (such
as crossword puzzles/Sudoku); reading books, magazines, or newspapers; or playing card games or
games such as chess. Responses were coded either 0 (for nonparticipation in a certain activity) or 1 (for
participation in a certain activity).
The study also considered other sociodemographic variables that may have been important in
understanding the links between personality traits, memory, and leisure activities. Age and place of
residence by country were taken into account. The countries were grouped by region into four groups
based on the UN Geoscheme for Europe produced by the UN Statistics Division: north (Sweden, Denmark,
Ireland, Spain, Lithuania, Finland, Latvia); west (Austria, Germany, the Netherlands, France, Switzerland,
Belgium, Luxembourg); east (Czech Republic, Poland, Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia); and south
(Spain, Italy, Greece, Israel, Portugal, Slovenia, Croatia, Cyprus, Malta). The variables were transformed
into dummy variables by selecting the countries of the northern region as the reference group.
Data analysis
IBM SPSS Statistics 22 software was used for statistical data analysis. Descriptive statistics and
Pearson’s correlation coefcients were calculated, and linear and hierarchical multiple regression models
were constructed.
www.ijcrsee.com
133
Ivleva, V., & Kairys, A. (2023). The Associations Between Personality Traits, Leisure Activities, and Memory Performance in
Older Adulthood, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 11(1), 129-
141.
Results
The links between personality traits and memory were assessed rst, and Pearson’s correlation
coefcients were calculated for this purpose (Table 1). Memory showed statistically signicant but
weak correlations with all personality traits, with its strongest relationship being found with openness to
experience (r = 0.18, p < 0.001; r = 0.17, p < 0.001). Higher levels of openness were associated with better
immediate and delayed recall among older adults.
Table 1
Pearson’s correlation coefcients linking memory and personality traits (N = 24,930)
The relationship between cognitively stimulating leisure activities and memory in older adults was
also examined, rst by calculating Pearson’s correlation coefcients (Table 2). Memory had statistically
signicant but weak correlations with all leisure activities. The strongest statistically signicant relationship
was found with reading books, magazines, or newspapers (r = 0.26, p < 0.001; r = 0.27, p < 0.001),
and solving puzzles (such as crosswords or Sudoku puzzles) (r = 0.22, p < 0.001; r = 0.25, p < 0.001).
Reading books, magazines, or newspapers and solving verbal or numerical puzzles is associated with
better immediate and delayed recall among older adults.
Table 2
Pearson correlation coefcients between memory and leisure activities (N = 24,930)
Note: 1 = voluntary or charity work; 2 = educational or training courses; 3 = sport, social, or other similar clubs; 4 =
political or community-related organizations; 5 = books, magazines, or newspapers; 6 = word or number games (such as
crossword puzzles/Sudoku); and 7 = card games or games such as chess; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. The highest values are
marked in bold.
Finally, a four-step hierarchical linear regression analysis was applied to assess the prognostic value
of personality traits on memory performance in older adulthood over and above the demographic (i.e., age
and country of residence) and leisure activity factors (Figure 1). In the rst regression model (Table 3),
immediate recall was selected as a dependent variable; and in the second (Table 4), delayed recall was
chosen. Independent variables were included in four stages: 1) age; 2) country group (European countries
were divided into 4 groups according to the geographical regions of east, west, south, and north); 3)
leisure activities; and 4) personality traits.
www.ijcrsee.com
134
Ivleva, V., & Kairys, A. (2023). The Associations Between Personality Traits, Leisure Activities, and Memory Performance in
Older Adulthood, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 11(1), 129-
141.
Figure 1. Graphic model of 4- step hierarchical multiple regression analysis assessing prognostic
value of personality traits on memory performance in older adults over and above the demographic and
leisure activity factors
There were no outliers in the data (all Cook’s distance values were < 1), and no multicollinearity
problem was identied (all VIF values < 4). Based on the plotting of residuals, no problems of
homoscedasticity were identied. The results of the hierarchical linear regression models are presented
in Tables 3 and 4.
The rst regression model—using age as a prognostic factor—explained 9% of the variance of
immediate recall and 8% of delayed recall. This suggests that memory declines as the age of participants
increases.
The second regression model included another sociodemographic variable (country groups), and
explained 13% of the variance of both the immediate and delayed recall results. R2 change = 0.03 and R2
change = 0.04 were statistically signicant (F change = 321.25, p < 0.001; F change = 421.8, p < 0.001).
This suggests that the rst and second models were statistically signicantly different. The country group
variable, included in the regression equation along with age, additionally explained 3% of the variance of
immediate and 4% of delayed recall. These results suggest that living in western and northern countries
predicts better memory capacity in older adulthood.
The third regression model included leisure activities, and explained 21% of the variance of
immediate recall and 19% of delayed recall. R2 change = 0.08 and R2 change = 0.06 were statistically
signicant (F change = 362.03, p < 0.000; F change = 283.48 p < 0.001). This shows that the second and
third regression models were statistically signicantly different. The leisure activities variable, included in
the regression equation along with the age and country groups, additionally explained 8% of the variance
of immediate and 6% of delayed recall. In this equation, memory was most strongly predicted by the age
variable and leisure activities such as verbal and numerical games (crosswords or Sudoku puzzles) and
reading.
www.ijcrsee.com
135
Ivleva, V., & Kairys, A. (2023). The Associations Between Personality Traits, Leisure Activities, and Memory Performance in
Older Adulthood, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 11(1), 129-
141.
Table 3
Results of hierarchical multiple regression analysis with the results of immediate recall as a
dependent variable (N = 24,930)
The nal regression model included personality traits, and explained 22% of the variance of
immediate recall and 20% of delayed recall. R2 change = 0.01 and R2 change = 0.01 were statistically
signicant (F change = 65.21, p < 0.001; F change = 58.25, p < 0.001). Therefore, the third and the nal
regression models also differ statistically signicantly, which means that—even when controlling for leisure
activities—personality traits improve the prediction of immediate and delayed recall by 1%. However, in
this equation, memory was predicted only by the traits of openness to experience and neuroticism.
www.ijcrsee.com
136
Ivleva, V., & Kairys, A. (2023). The Associations Between Personality Traits, Leisure Activities, and Memory Performance in
Older Adulthood, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 11(1), 129-
141.
Table 4
Results of hierarchical multiple regression analysis with the results of delayed recall as a dependent
variable (N = 24,930)
Note. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. All ANOVA values of the models are statistically signicant. The largest value
in each model is marked in bold. ALY = activities in last year.
Discussions
The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between personality traits and memory
abilities in older adulthood. The current study contributes to our understanding of the relationship between
personality traits and memory by also examining engagement in leisure activities. These results have
revealed that, although age is the strongest predictor of memory performance in older adulthood, there are
signicant associations between leisure activities, memory, and personality traits. Leisure activities such
as reading books and solving puzzles predict memory capacity in older adulthood, however associations
between memory and personality are traitspecic. Although all ve personality traits are related to memory,
only neuroticism, extraversion, and openness to experience predict memory abilities in older adulthood.
After controlling for sociodemographic variables and leisure activities, only neuroticism and openness
to experience signicantly predicted memory. However, it must be noted that the size of this effect was
quite small, and therefore these results need to be interpreted carefully. Never-theless, these ndings
support previous literature on the relationship between personality traits and memory (Klaming, Veltman
and Comijs, 2016; Soubelet and Salthouse, 2011; Leavitt et al., 2017), and also allow new assumptions
to be made.
Our results show that memory abilities in older adulthood might be predicted by the trait of
neuroticism—a nding consistent with other studies. This relationship is often explained by behavioral
factors: individuals with higher levels of neuroticism are more likely to experience anxiety during cognitive
assessment, and this might affect their nal cognitive results (Curtis, Windsor and Soubelet, 2015;
www.ijcrsee.com
137
Ivleva, V., & Kairys, A. (2023). The Associations Between Personality Traits, Leisure Activities, and Memory Performance in
Older Adulthood, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 11(1), 129-
141.
Maldonato et al., 2017; Katsumi, Denkova and Dolcos, 2017). Long-term behavioral factors may also
be important, as various studies have shown that people with high levels of neuroticism are more likely
to choose an unhealthy lifestyle due to weaker impulse control, not follow treatment instructions, and
experience sleep disorders (Terracciano and Costa, 2004; Lahey, 2009; Duggan et al., 2014). These
factors have an adverse effect on brain health and, consequently, on memory abilities (Boyle et al.,
2010). According to Maldonato and colleagues (2017), neuroticism is also often associated with a poorer
socioeconomic situation, which restricts a person’s access to involvement in mentally stimulating activities
(leisure activities, for example). Poorer experiences are in turn associated with poorer cognition in older
adulthood. However, in our study, neuroticism predicted memory even after controlling for involvement in
leisure activities. This suggests that there are other possible mechanisms which link this trait to memory.
According to our study, higher levels of extraversion and openness to experience—the latter in
particular—predict better memory. These associations are also often explained by indirect mechanisms.
For example, people with higher levels of openness are more likely to engage in a variety of mentally
engaging activities (reading books or newspapers, solving crossword puzzles, or playing musical
instruments), pursue higher education, use technologies, engage in social and cultural activities, and
so on (Wang et al., 2013; Fancourt and Steptoe, 2018; Chapman et al., 2012; Jackson, Balota and
Head, 2011). Extraversion is also seen as a prerequisite for greater social stimulation (Meier et al., 2002;
Maldonato et al., 2017), as extroverted individuals are more likely to be involved in various activities,
communicate, go out and explore new places, etc.
One possible mechanism for explaining the relationship between openness, extraversion, and
memory is the cognitive reserve hypothesis (Stern, 2002, 2009). This idea states that people who
are more open to experience and prone to extraversion are more likely to engage in a variety of leisure
activities and gain a wide range of experiences, and these factors are protective of a level of cognitive
performance that includes memory (Hultsch et al., 1999; Clare et al., 2017; Arenaza-Urquijo, Wirth and
Chételat, 2015; Scarmeas and Stern, 2003; Leavitt et al., 2017). However, the results of the present study
show that even after controlling for involvement in leisure activities, openness to experience signicantly
predicts memory abilities in older adulthood. Thus, it can be assumed that there are other mechanisms that
link openness to experience and memory—and these results are consistent with those of other studies.
For example, Soubelet and Salthouse (2011) conducted a study to examine the impact of involvement
in various general and leisure activities on the association between openness and cognitive abilities.
Although the study also showed a relationship between openness and cognitive abilities, it could not be
explained by the effect of involvement in leisure activities. In fact, the links between measures of activity
and both openness and cognition were modest. Therefore, it was concluded that the relationship between
openness and cognitive functioning might not be due to engagement in activities.
The pathway for openness is still mostly unknown, however the scientic literature provides the
assumption that openness and cognitive ability may be related because they largely measure the same
construct. Another possible explanation is that there might be some behavioral factors that mediate the
relationship between openness and better memory capacity in older adulthood. For example, individuals
who are more open to experience often choose a healthier diet and are more physically active (Sutin et al.,
2016) and the fact that these factors preserve cognitive function in older adulthood is documented (Schott
and Krull, 2019). The latest research also provides an opportunity to explain the association between
personality and cognitive abilities from a neurophysiological perspective. There is evidence that openness
to experience may be associated with the release of dopamine, which is considered to be one of the main
physiological factors that stimulates human action while inuencing cognitive processes (Maldonato et
al., 2017). There is little research examining these links, however, and so the need for further research is
emphasized.
This study did not avoid some limitations. Firstly, only the links between major traits and memory
were assessed. In recent years, there has been a growing body of research showing that the low-er-
level traits (facets) of the Big Five model may be associated differently with the same cognitive functions
(Chapman et al., 2012; Rammstedt, Lechner and Danner, 2018; Graham and Lachman, 2014; Maldonato
et al., 2017). This means that some facets may have positive associations while others have negative
ones, or even no association with cognition at all. Thus, the nal result of the study might be skewed,
and this may partially explain the diversity of current data in the scientic literature (Curtis, Windsor and
Soubelet, 2015). An analysis of the relationship between lower-level personality traits and cognition would
provide an opportunity to take a new look at the role of personality in cognitive functioning over the course
of life (Graham and Lachman, 2014). It should also be noted that only the relationships between separate
personality traits and memory were assessed. A complex analysis including different combinations of
various personality traits and their associations with cognition could expand the eld of research and
www.ijcrsee.com
138
Ivleva, V., & Kairys, A. (2023). The Associations Between Personality Traits, Leisure Activities, and Memory Performance in
Older Adulthood, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 11(1), 129-
141.
reveal different results. It is also important to mention that, in order to analyze data from more countries,
only one wave (the 7
th
and latest) of SHARE data was used for the analysis. The inclusion of other waves
could provide more comprehensive data and would allow for the identication of longitudinal changes in
memory performance over time.
Despite these limitations, the current study employs a large community-dwelling sample and sheds
light on the association between personality traits and memory performance among older adults. The
data adds to existing research in the eld by showing that personality might be an important factor in
understanding individual differences in memory capacity in older adulthood, and contributes to a better
understanding of cognitive aging.
Conclusions
In future research, it would be useful to examine more complex associations between personality
and cognition, taking into account that facets of the same personality trait might interact differently with
each other. For example, neuroticism can affect memory depending on the level of conscientiousness.
A narrow focus on personality traits and an analysis of their interactions with memory could benet
the theorists who research age-related issues and signicantly expand the eld of existing knowledge
(Colombo et al., 2019). Waris and colleagues (2018) suggest also taking into account the context in which
one or another personality trait manifests. This knowledge might not only occupy the niche of absent data,
but could also be useful for planning interventions for individuals with memory impairment. In future, it
will also be important to conduct longitudinal research that examines the causal relationships between
personality traits and memory, and perform a mediation analysis of these relationships that takes into
account other potentially important variables.
In conclusion, personality traits are associated with memory in older adulthood. Higher levels
of neuroticism predict worse memory, while higher levels of openness and extraversion predict better
memory. These associations might be explained by indirect mechanisms such as certain behaviors or
lifestyle factors that contribute to building both the cognitive reserve and neurophysiological processes.
Identifying the relationships between personality traits and cognition helps to better understand individual
cognitive differences and age-related changes in cognition. While personality traits are known to be quite
stable over the course of life, some of them can be inuenced to some extent. Thus, despite the limitations
of this study, the research contains important results that not only provide a better understanding of the
relationship between personality, memory, and leisure activities, but also contribute to our ability to predict
cognitive functioning in older adulthood and thereby help to shape appropriate support programs for
people with memory impairment.
Acknowledgements
The SHARE data collection has been funded by the European Commission through FP5 (QLK6-
CT-2001-00360), FP6 (SHARE-I3: RII-CT-2006-062193, COMPARE: CIT5-CT-2005-028857, SHARELIFE:
CIT4-CT-2006-028812), FP7 (SHARE-PREP: GA N°211909, SHARE-LEAP: GA N°227822, SHARE
M4: GA N°261982) and Horizon 2020 (SHARE-DEV3: GA N°676536, SERISS: GA N°654221) and by
DG Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion. Additional funding from the German Ministry of Education
and Research, the Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science, the U.S. National Institute on
Aging (U01_AG09740-13S2, P01_AG005842, P01_AG08291, P30_AG12815, R21_AG025169, Y1-
AG-4553-01, IAG_BSR06-11, OGHA_04-064, HHSN271201300071C) and from various national funding
sources is gratefully acknowledged (see www.share-project.org).
Conict of interests
The authors declare no conict of interest.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, V.Ivleva and A.Kairys; methodology, V.Ivleva and A.Kairys; formal analysis,
V.Ivleva; writing -original draft, V.Ivleva; writing - review and editing, V.Ivleva and A.Kairys; supervision,
A.Kairys. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
www.ijcrsee.com
139
Ivleva, V., & Kairys, A. (2023). The Associations Between Personality Traits, Leisure Activities, and Memory Performance in
Older Adulthood, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 11(1), 129-
141.
References
Adam, S., Bonsang, E., Grotz, C., & Perelman, S. (2013). Occupational activity and cognitive reserve: implications in terms of
prevention of cognitive aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Clinical interventions in aging, 377-390. https://doi.org/10.2147/
cia.s39921
Arenaza-Urquijo, E. M., Wirth, M., & Chételat, G. (2015). Cognitive reserve and lifestyle: moving towards preclinical Alzheimer’s
disease. Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 7, 134. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00134
Axelsson, M., Brink, E., Lundgren, J., & Lötvall, J. (2011). The inuence of personality traits on reported adherence to
medication in individuals with chronic disease: an epidemiological study in West Sweden. PloS one, 6(3), e18241.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018241
Bergmann, M., Kneip, T., De Luca, G., & Scherpenzeel, A. (2019a). Survey participation in the Survey of Health, Ageing and
Retirement in Europe (SHARE), Wave 1–7. Based on Release 7.0.0. SHARE Working Paper Series (41-2019). Munich
Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA).
Bergmann, M., Scherpenzeel, A., & Börsch-Supan, A. (Eds.). (2019b). SHARE Wave 7 methodology: Panel innovations and
life histories. MEA, Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.
Börsch-Supan, A. (2019). Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) Wave 6; Release Version: 7.0. 0;
SHARE-ERIC. Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA): Munich, Germany. https://doi.org/10.6103/SHARE.
w7.700
Börsch-Supan, A., Brandt, M., Hunkler, C., Kneip, T., Korbmacher, J., Malter, F., Schaan, B., Stuck, S., & Zuber, S. (2013). Data
resource prole: The survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (SHARE). International Journal of Epidemiology,
42(4), 992–1001. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyt088
Boyle, L. L., Lyness, J. M., Duberstein, P. R., Karuza, J., King, D. A., Messing, S., & Tu, X. (2010). Trait neuroticism, depression,
and cognitive function in older primary care patients. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18(4), 305–312.
https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181c2941b
Cadar, D., Robitaille, A., Clouston, S., Hofer S. M., Piccinin, A. M., & Muniz-Terrera, G. (2017). An in-ternational evaluation
of cognitive reserve and memory changes in early old age in 10 European countries. Neuroepidemiology, 48, 9–20.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000452276
Chapman, B., Duberstein, P., Tindle, H. A., Sink, K. M., Robbins, J., Tancredi, D. J., Franks, P., & Gingko Evaluation of Memory
Study Investigators. (2012). Personality predicts cognitive function over 7 years in older persons. The American Journal
of Geriatric Psychiatry, 20(7), 612–621. https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e31822cc9cb
Chaves, A. S., dos Santos, A. M., de Britto e Alves, M. S. S., & Filho, N. S. (2015). Association between cognitive decline and
the quality of life of hypertensive elderly individuals. Brazilian Journal of Geriatrics and Gerontology, 18(3), 545–556.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-9823.2015.14043
Cheke, L. G., & Clayton, N. S. (2013). Do different tests of episodic memory produce consistent results in human adults?
Learning & Memory, 20, 491–498. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.030502.113
Clare, L., Wu, Y-T., Teale, J. C., MacLeod, C., Matthews, F., Brayne, C., & Woods, B. (2017). Potentially modiable lifestyle
factors, cognitive reserve, and cognitive function in later life: A cross-sectional study. PLoS Medicine, 14(3), Article
e1002259. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002259
Colombo, B., Piromalli, G., Pins, B., Taylor, C., & Fabio, R. S. (2019). The relationship between cognitive reserve and personality
traits: A pilot study on a healthy aging Italian sample. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 32(10), 2031–2040.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01386-1
Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (1992). Four ways ve factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653–665. https://
doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I
Curtis, R. G., Windsor, T. D., & Soubelet, A. (2015). The relationship between Big-5 personality traits and cognitive ability in
older adults – a review. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 22(1), 42–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.201
4.888392
Dal Bianco, C., Garrouste, C., & Paccagnella, O. (2013). Early-life circumstances and cognitive func-tioning dynamics in later
life. In A. Börsch-Supan, M. Brandt, H. Litwin & G. Webe (Eds.), Active ageing and solidarity between generations
in Europe: First results from SHARE after the economic crisis (pp. 209–224). Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.
org/10.1515/9783110295467.209
Duberstein, P. R., Chapman, B. P., Tindle, H. A., Sink, K. M., Bamonti, P., Robbins J., Jerant, A. F., & Franks, P. (2011).
Personality and risk for Alzheimer’s disease in adults 72 years of age and older: A six-year follow-up. Psychology and
Aging, 26(2), 351–362. https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0021377
Duggan, K. A., Friedman, H. S., McDevitt, E. A., & Mednick, S. C. (2014). Personality and Healthy Sleep: The Importance of
Conscientiousness and Neuroticism. PLoS ONE, 9(3), e90628. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090628
Erber, J. T. (2012). Aging and older adulthood (3rd ed.). Thomson Wadsworth.
Fancourt, D., & Steptoe, A. (2018). Cultural engagement predicts changes in cognitive function in older adults over a 10 year
period: Findings from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Scientic Reports, 8(1), Article 10226. https://doi.
org/10.1038/s41598-018-28591-8
Graham, E. K., & Lachman, M. L. (2014). Personality traits, facets and cognitive performance: Age differences in their relations.
Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.11.011
Hill, N. L., Kolanowski, A. M., Fick, D., Chinchilli, V. M., & Jablonski, R. A. (2014). Personality as a moderator of cognitive
stimulation in older adults at high risk for cognitive decline. Research in Gerontological Nursing, 7(4), 159–170. https://
doi.org/10.3928/19404921-20140311-01
Hock, R. S., Lee, H. B., Bienvenu, O. J., Nestadt, G., Samuels, J. F., Parisi, J. M., Costa, P. T., Jr., & Spira, A. P. (2014).
Personality and cognitive decline in the Baltimore epidemiologic catchment area follow-up study. The American Journal
of Geriatric Psychiatry, 22(9), 917–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2012.12.217
Hultsch, D. F., Hertzog, C., Small, B. J., & Dixon, R. A. (1999). Use it or lose it: Engaged lifestyle as a buffer of cognitive decline
in aging? Psychology and Aging, 14(2), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.14.2.245
www.ijcrsee.com
140
Ivleva, V., & Kairys, A. (2023). The Associations Between Personality Traits, Leisure Activities, and Memory Performance in
Older Adulthood, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 11(1), 129-
141.
Ikeda, Y., Ogawa, N., Yoshiura, K., Han, G., Maruta, M., Hotta, M., & Tabira T. (2019). Instrumental activities of daily living: The
processes involved in and performance of these activities by Japanese community-dwelling older adults with subjective
memory complaints. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(14), Article 2617. https://
doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142617
Jackson, J. J., Hill, P. L., Payne, B. R., Parisi, J. M., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. (2019). Linking openness to cognitive ability in older
adulthood: The role of activity diversity. Aging & mental health, 24(7), 1079-1087. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2
019.1655705
Jackson, J., Balota, D. A., & Head, D. (2011). Exploring the relationship between personality and re-gional brain volume in
healthy aging. Neurobiology of Aging, 32(12), 2162–2171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.12.009
Katsumi, Y., Denkova, E., & Dolcos, S. (2017). Personality and memory. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia
of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-
28099-8_992-1
Klaming, R., Veltman, D. J., & Comijs, H. C. (2016). The impact of personality on memory function in older adults—results
from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 32(7), 798–804. https://
doi.org/10.1002/gps.4527
Mousavi-Nasab, S. M. H., Kormi-Nouri, R., & Nilsson, L. (2014). Examination of the bidirectional inuences of leisure activity
and memory in old people: A dissociative effect on episodic memory. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 382–398.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12044
Lahey, B. B. (2009). Public health signicance of neuroticism. American Psychologist, 64(4), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/
a0015309
Leavitt, V. M., Buyukturkoglu, K., Inglese, M., & Sumowski, J. F. (2017). Protective personality traits: High openness and low
neuroticism linked to better memory in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 23(13), 1786–1790. https://doi.
org/10.1177/1352458516685417
Litwin, H., Schwartz, E., & Damri, N. (2017). Cognitively stimulating leisure activity and subsequent cognitive function: A
SHARE-based Analysis. Gerontologist, 57(5), 940–948. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw084
Lojo-Seoane, C., Facal, D., Guarida-Olmos, J., Pereiro, A. X., & Juncos-Rabadan, O. (2018). Effects of cognitive reserve on
cognitive performance in a follow-up study in older adults with subjective cognitive complaints. The role of working
memory. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 10, Article 189. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00189
Luchetti, M., Terracciano, A., Stephan, Y., & Sutin, A.R. (2016). Personality and cognitive decline in older adults: Data from a
longitudinal sample and meta-analysis. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 71(4), 591–601. https://doi.org/10.1093/
geronb/gbu184
Maldonato, N. M., Sperandeo, R., Dell’Orco, S., Cozzolino, P., Fusco, M. L., Iorio, V. S., Albesi, D., Marone, P., Nascivera,
N., & Cipresso, P. (2017). The relationship between personality and neurocognition among the American
elderly: An epidemiologic study. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 13, 233–245. https://doi.
org/10.2174/1745017901713010233
Meier, B., Perrig-Chiello, P., & Perrig, W. (2002). Personality and memory in old age. Aging, Neuro-psychology, and Cognition,
9(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1076/anec.9.2.135.9544
Mõttus, R., Realo, A., Allik, J., Deary, I. J., Esko, T., & Metspalu, A. (2012). Personality traits and eating habits in a large sample
of Estonians. Health Psychology, 31(6), 806–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027041
Mousavi-Nasab, S. M. H., Kormi-Nouri, R., & Nilsson, L. G. (2013). Examination of the bidirectional inuences of leisure activity
and memory in old people: A dissociative effect on episodic memory. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 382–398.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12044
Newton, N. J., Pladevall-Guyer, J., Gonzalez, R., & Smith, J. (2016). Activity engagement and activity-related experiences: The
role of personality. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 73(8), 1480-1490. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw098
Nyberg L., Lövdén, M., Riklund, K., Lindenberger, U., & Bäckman, L. (2012). Memory aging and brain maintenance. Trends in
Cognitive Sciences, 16(5), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.005
Park, D. C., & Festini, S. B. (2017). Theories of memory and aging: A look at the past and a glimpse of the future. The Journals
of Gerontology: Series B, 72(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw066
Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short ver-sion of the Big Five
Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jrp.2006.02.001
Rammstedt, B., Lechner, C. M., & Danner, D. (2018). Relationships between personality and cognitive ability: A facet-level
analysis. Journal of Intelligence, 6(2), Article 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6020028
Scarmeas, N., & Stern, Y. (2003). Cognitive reserve and lifestyle. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25(5),
625–633. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.25.5.625.14576
Schott, N., & Krull, K. (2019). Stability of Lifestyle Behavior – The Answer to Successful Cognitive Aging? A Comparison
of Nuns, Monks, Master Athletes and Non-active Older Adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/
fpsyg.2019.01347
Schwaba, T., Luhmann, M., Denissen, J. J. A., Chung, J. M., & Bleidorn, W. (2018). Openness to experience and culture-
openness transactions across the lifespan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(1), 118–136. https://doi.
org/10.1037/pspp0000150
Soubelet, A., & Salthouse, T. A. (2011). Personality–cognition relations across adulthood. Develop-mental Psychology, 47(2),
303–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021816
Stephan, Y., Boiché, J., Canada, B., & Terracciano, A. (2013). Association of personality with physical, social, and mental
activities across the lifespan: Findings from US and French samples. British Journal of Psychology, 105(4), 564–580.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12056
Sutin, A. R., Stephan, Y., Luchetti, M., Artese, A., Oshio, A., & Terracciano, A. (2016). The ve-factor model of personality
and physical inactivity: A meta-analysis of 16 samples. Journal of Research in Personality, 63, 22–28. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.05.001
Sutin, A. R., Stephan, Y., Luchetti, M., & Terracciano, A. (2019). Five-factor model personality traits and cognitive function in ve
www.ijcrsee.com
141
Ivleva, V., & Kairys, A. (2023). The Associations Between Personality Traits, Leisure Activities, and Memory Performance in
Older Adulthood, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 11(1), 129-
141.
domains in older adulthood. BMC Geriatrics, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1362-1
Stephan, Y., Sutin, A. R., Luchetti, M., & Terracciano, A. (2020). Personality and memory performance over twenty years:
Findings from three prospective studies. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 128, 109885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jpsychores.2019.109885
Stern, Y. (2002). What is cognitive reserve? Theory and research application of the reserve concept. Journal of the International
Neuropsychological Society, 8(3), 448–460. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617702813248
Stern, Y. (2009). Cognitive reserve. Neuropsychologia, 47(10), 2015–2028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
neuropsychologia.2009.03.004
Terracciano, A., & Costa, P. T. (2004). Smoking and the Five-Factor Model of personality. Addiction, 99(4), 472–481. https://
doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00687.x
Terracciano, A., Löckenhoff, C. E., Crum, R. M., Bienvenu, O. J., & Costa, P. T., Jr (2008). Five-factor model personality proles
of drug users. BMC Psychiatry, 8, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-8-22
Uttl, B., White, C. A., Gonzalez, D. W., McDouall, J., & Leonard, C. A. (2013). Prospective memory, personality, and individual
differences. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 130. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00130
Walker, K. R., & Tesco, G. (2013). Molecular mechanisms of cognitive dysfunction following traumatic brain injury. Frontiers in
Aging Neuroscience, 5, Article 29. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2013.00029
Wang, H. X., Jin, Y., Hendrie, H. C., Liang, C., Yang, L., Cheng, Y., Unverzagt, F. W., Ma, F., Hall, K. S., Murrell, J. R., Li,
P., Bian, J., Pei, J. J., & Gao, S. (2013). Late life leisure activities and risk of cognitive decline. The Journals of
Gerontology: Series A, 68(2), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gls153
Waris, O., Soveri, A., Lukasik, K. M., Lehtonen, M., & Laine, M. (2018). Working memory and the Big Five. Personality and
Individual Differences, 130, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.027
Weinstein, G., Barak, E. R., Beeri, M. S., & Ravona-Springer, R. (2019). Personality traits and cognitive function in old-adults
with type-2 diabetes. Aging & Mental Health, 23(10), 1317–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2018.1493720
Wetherell, J. L., Reynolds, C. A., Gatz, M., & Pedersen, N. L. (2002). Anxiety, cognitive performance, and cognitive decline in
normal aging. Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 57(3), 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/57.3.P246
