www.ijcrsee.com
187
Kolenova, A., et al. (2023). Personality traits, approval motivation, and empathy as predictors of cognitive regulation of emotions
and behavioral self-control in codependent women, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and
Education (IJCRSEE), 11(2), 187-197.
Introduction
Recent studies of the codependency phenomenon, regardless of the approach, show that
codependency can be studied through the specics of learned behavioral patterns, features of emotional
states, adaptation disorders, various personality disorders, etc. (Artemtseva, 2012; Artemtseva and
Galkina, 2014; Moskalenko, 2016; Rezvaya, Samsonov and Kutashova, 2019; Askian, et al., 2016;
Askian, et al., 2016; Bacon, et al., 2020; Panaghi, et al., 2016; Rozhnova, et al., 2020; etc.). A number of
studies, including our previously published works, emphasized a rather high comorbidity with emotional
disorders and other forms of addictive behavior (substance abuse, gambling, the Internet, etc.) and show
the specics of code-pendents psychological characteristics, which manifest themselves in the emotional,
behavioral and cognitive aspects (Andronnikova, 2017; Apenok, 2015; Bashmanov and Kalinichenko,
2015; Bereza et al., 2016; Gagai and Selezneva, 2016; Kolenova and Gurtskoy, 2019; Merinov et al.,
2015; Perminova, 2017; Pleshakova, 2018; and others).
At the emotional level, the codependency manifestations are closely associated with emotional
sensitivity and a high level of empathy, neuroticism, anxiety, externality of control, decreased self-
esteem, guilt, and depressive symptoms (Stryapukhina and Posokhova, 2022; Stryapukhina Yu. V.,
2021; Shapovalov and Golenischeva, 2022; Orbon M. C. et al., 2021; Kupchenko, 2020; Politica O.
I., 2020; Ermakov, Kukulyar and Kolenova, 2018; Tulebaeva, 2017; Kogan, Drozdov and Kardashian,
2012; Moskalenko, 2009). A sample of relatives of drug addicts showed a high level of emotional burnout
(Shishkova and Bocharov, 2022). Women in romantic relationships with drug addicts have a low level of
Personality Traits, Approval Motivation, and Empathy as Predictors
of Cognitive Regulation of Emotions and Behavioral Self-Control in
Codependent Women
Anastasia Kolenova
1,2
, Ekaterina Denisova
1,2*
, Anna Kukulyar
1,3
, Pavel Ermakov
1
1
Regional Scientic Center of the Russian Academy of Education, Southern Federal University; Rostov-on-Don, Russian
Federation, e-mail: askolenova@gmail.com, denisovakeith@gmail.com, vetkina-anna@mail.ru, paver@sfedu.ru
2
Department “Clinical Psychology and Psychophysiology”, Don State Technical University, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation
3
Department “General and consultative psychology” Don State Technical University, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation
Abstract: This study examined psychological characteristics and behavioral regulation in codependent women. The study
aimed to identify personality traits, approval motivation, and empathy levels as predictors of behavioral regulation in codependent
women. A total of 102 women (mean age 30.39 years) in relationships or related to alcohol, drug, or non-chemical addicts
participated. Psychological testing and survey were used to assess codependence, aggression, empathy, need for approval,
cognitive regulation of emotions, and self-regulation strategies: codependency Self-Inventory scale (CSIS; B. Weinhold, J.
Weinhold); questionnaire “Auto- and Aggression to others” (E.P. Ilyin); method “Diagnosis of the level of empathy” (V. V. Boyko);
Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (adapted by Yu.L.Khanin); The questionnaire of cognitive regulation of emotions
(Rasskazova E.I., Leonova A.B., Pluzhnikov I.V.) and the questionnaire “Style of self-regulation of behavior” (Morosanova V.I.).
Results suggest that personal characteristics, approval motivation, and empathy can predict the severity of codependence,
manifestation of aggressiveness, self-regulation strategies, and cognitive regulation strategies in codependent women.
Keywords: codependency, codependent women, codependent behavior, personality traits, approval motivation, empathy,
cognitive regulation of emotions, behavioral self-control.
Original scientic paper
Received: May, 15.2023.
Revised: July, 14.2023.
Accepted: July, 25.2023.
UDC:
159.923.075-053.2:316.362.1-056.8
159.942.075-053.2:316.362.1-056.8
10.23947/2334-8496-2023-11-2-187-197
© 2023 by the authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
*
Corresponding author: denisovakeith@gmail.com
www.ijcrsee.com
188
Kolenova, A., et al. (2023). Personality traits, approval motivation, and empathy as predictors of cognitive regulation of emotions
and behavioral self-control in codependent women, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and
Education (IJCRSEE), 11(2), 187-197.
emotional intelligence, a reduced ability to understand and manage their own emotions (Khazovaand and
Shipova, 2020).
At the cognitive level, codependence is associated with dysfunctional beliefs and certain cognitive
errors associated with the need for control and the desire to avoid uncertainty (Artemtseva and Malkina,
2022). It has been shown that codependents have decreased levels of reection and self-differentiation,
emotional reactivity, emotional withdrawal, and merging with others (Lampis, et al., 2017). In addition,
features of the time perspective were identied in codependent men and women, which are characterized
by an increased focus on the present (Danilova and Gomba, 2021).
In the behavioral aspect, a tendency to obsessions, loss of personal autonomy, a predominance
of catastrophizing reactions, a tendency to self-aggression and self-destructive behavior were shown
(Stryapukhina, 2021; Kupchenko, 2020; Rozhnova T. M. et al., 2020; Kolenova and Gurtskoy, 2019;
Buzik and Emova, 2019; Perminova, 2017; Merinov et al., 2015). Codependency, as a dysfunctional
form of relationships, is signicantly associated with negative forms of dyadic adaptation in couples,
relationship problems, and reduced life satisfaction (Happ, et al., 2022). There is also evidence of the
absence or blurring of psychological boundaries and a tendency to violate them with others, negative
attitudes towards theirs self and others, as well as a lack of personal coping resources (Khazova and
Varioshkina, 2022; Kolenova, 2019; Tasheva and Bedredinova, 2016). A decrease in self-regulation at
psychological and physiological levels has also been shown (Zielinski, Bradshaw and Mullet, 2019).
Previous studies of the motivational sphere, which are not numerous among codependents, showed
a pronounced need for approval and the motive “to be needed” (Stryapukhina, 2021; Vinnikov, 2019).
In earlier works, we also managed to establish that the severity of codependency can be determined
by deformation of the value-semantic sphere, lack of necessary competencies under the inuence of
negative experience of dysfunctional relationships with signicant others, which is also seen in a number
of other codependency studies (Artemtseva and Galkina, 2014; Bereza, et al., 2016; Buzik and Emova,
2019; Gagai and Selezneva, 2016; Ermakov, Denisova and Kolenova, 2022; Ezin, 2018; Kolenova and
Gurtskoi, 2019; Suntsova and Faizova, 2018; Lima, et al., 2019, etc. ).
Thus, an analysis of the scientic literature allows us to conclude that the manifestations
of codependency are closely associated with early experiences and the emotional and personal
characteristics of individuals. Codependents often exhibit specic distortions in the cognitive, emotional,
and value-semantic domains, along with distinctive behavioral features. However, despite existing studies
on codependent behavior, there is a paucity of empirical research examining the motivational and personal
predictors of behavioral regulation in codependent women. Therefore, this article aims to investigate how
personality traits, approval motivations, and the level of empathy predict the behavioral regulation of
codependent women.
The hypothesis of the study is that personal characteristics, approval motivation, and the level
of empathy can determine the characteristics of the manifestation of aggressiveness, the formation of
various strategies of self-regulation, and preferences for strategies for cognitive regulation of emotions in
codependent women. Additionally, it is assumed that the level of codependency will vary depending on
motivational and personal characteristics.
Materials and Methods
Participants
The study involved 102 women aged 18 to 64 years (mean age 30.39 years) who are in a relationship
or related to an addict (alcoholism, drug addiction, non-chemical addictions). Including: 52 women who
are in a relationship or are related to an alcohol addict; 22 women who are in a relationship or related
to a drug addict; 28 women who are in a relationship or are related to non-chemical addicts (gambling,
smoking, interpersonal addiction, etc.).
Research methods
In order to study the psychological characteristics of the respondents, psychological testing was
carried out using the following methods: codependency Self-Inventory scale (CSIS; B. Weinhold, J.
Weinhold); questionnaire “Auto- and Aggression to others” (E.P. Ilyin); method “Diagnosis of the level
of empathy” (V. V. Boyko); Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (adapted by Yu.L.Khanin); The
questionnaire of cognitive regulation of emotions (Rasskazova E.I., Leonova A.B., Pluzhnikov I.V.) and
the questionnaire “Style of self-regulation of behavior” (Morosanova V.I.).
In order to collect socio-biographical data, a survey method was used: respondents were asked to
www.ijcrsee.com
189
Kolenova, A., et al. (2023). Personality traits, approval motivation, and empathy as predictors of cognitive regulation of emotions
and behavioral self-control in codependent women, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and
Education (IJCRSEE), 11(2), 187-197.
indicate gender, age, describe the type of addiction and their relationship with the addict.
Procedure
The study was conducted in person in online format. Before the start of the study, the purpose of
the study was explained to the respondents. Personal data has been anonymized. The participation of
respondents was voluntary.
Statistical data analysis
To determine the correspondence of the empirical distribution to the normal law, the Shapiro-Wilk
test was used; to divide the sample into subgroups that differ in motivational and personal characteristics,
cluster analysis was used (k-means method); to study the signicance of differences in the selected
subgroups, the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used (as a posteriori analysis, a pairwise
comparison was carried out using the Dunn method). Statistical processing was carried out using the
JASP 0.16 software package.
Results
The initial data analysis revealed that the average indicators for the studied scales do not differ
from the average values given in the description of the psychological tests used. At the same time, the
standard deviation on some scales of personality traits, empathy, and approval motivation indicated a
signicant spread of values within the sample. In this regard, at the second stage, the procedure for
clustering the sample according to the studied indicators was carried out. To level the differences in
scales of different methods, the clustering procedure was preceded by the translation of empirical values
of the Big Five questionnaire (B5-10), Social Desirability Scale and the “Diagnostics of the level of
empathy” questionnaire into standard z-scores. The number of clusters was chosen based on the results
of preliminary calculations. Using cluster analysis (k-means clustering) 4 clusters that differ signicantly in
the scales of personality traits, empathy, and approval motivation were identied. The rst cluster included
21 women (mean age 25.14 years), the second - 11 women (mean age 30.45 years), the third - 35 women
(mean age 32.77 years), the fourth - 35 women (mean age 31.14 years).
Figure 1. Clusters means for the studied indicators
The analysis revealed signicant differences in the average z-scores of the studied indicators
among the identied clusters (see Figure 1). Respondents included in cluster 1 exhibit high scores on
the scales of neuroticism, openness to experience and demonstrate a high level of empathy. Cluster
2 has low agreeableness and conscientiousness, as well as average indicators of extraversion and
need for ap-proval. Cluster 3 respondents are closer to the introversion pole, have reduced levels of
empathy, need for approval, and relatively high levels of neuroticism. Cluster 4 showed low values of
neuroticism and openness to experience, low empathy, increased values of extraversion, agreeableness,
conscientiousness and need for approval.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that all variables signicantly contributed to the clustering
of the sample (Table 1).
www.ijcrsee.com
190
Kolenova, A., et al. (2023). Personality traits, approval motivation, and empathy as predictors of cognitive regulation of emotions
and behavioral self-control in codependent women, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and
Education (IJCRSEE), 11(2), 187-197.
Table 1
Results of cluster analysis (analysis of variance (ANOVA))
Legend: SS (Sum of Squares) shows the sum of the squared deviations of the cluster means from the total mean; МS
(Mean Square) shows the between-group variance which is equal to the result of division of SS by the degrees of freedom
number; as this number is equal to the number of clusters minus 1, in this case SS=MS; Fisher’s F-test is the indicator of the
correctness of cluster discrimination; p – p-value.
To assess the signicance of differences in the severity of behavioral regulation indicators among
the selected clusters of codependent women, a comparative analysis was conducted (see Table 2). Prior
to the analysis, a preliminary test was conducted to examine the distribution of data on the studied scales
in the overall sample and within each cluster. The results indicated that the empirical distribution mostly
deviated from normality, necessitating the use of the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test to investigate
differences between the clusters.
Table 2
Mean scores and the results of the analysis of differences in regulation indicators of the codependent
women behavior in clusters
Analyzing the average values, it can be observed that within the rst cluster, the “exibility” strategy
of self-regulation is most prominent (cluster mean: 17.86). In the second cluster, the most notable strategies
are “exibility” (cluster mean: 16.55) and “independence” (cluster mean: 16.64). The third cluster exhibits
a prominent “assessment of results” strategy (cluster mean: 17.06), while the fourth cluster demonstrates
a higher emphasis on the “programming” (cluster mean: 18.46) and “exibility” (cluster mean: 18.46)
strategies.
Regarding cognitive emotion regulation strategies, the analysis revealed that the rst cluster exhibits
pronounced tendencies towards self-blame (cluster mean: 14.38), rumination (cluster mean: 14.95), focus
on planning (cluster mean: 14.09), and positive reappraisal (cluster mean: 14.57). In the second cluster,
the most prominent strategies are acceptance (cluster mean: 14.18) and focus on planning (cluster mean: