
www.ijcrsee.com
258
Dyankova, G., & Nikolova, S. (2023). Multicultural competence as a teacher’s metacognition to achieve a positive school
climate, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 11(2), 257-265.
Theoretical basis
It is established that many factors, such as social stratication, can lead to the differentiation of
students’ learning readiness and abilities. It is the responsibility of the school to try to compensate for
any cultural and educational decits, through the implementation of compensatory educational programs
and differentiated teaching (Matsangouras, 2007). In order to cope with the given reality, teachers, as
scientists but at the same time as professional educators, need not only basic professional education, but
also continuous training and education within the context of the school itself. The need therefore arises
for the teacher to acquire the appropriate “intercultural readiness and competence” that will enable her to
cope with today’s school reality.
The term “intercultural readiness” of the teacher refers to her ability to respond to the special
requirements imposed by the composition of the student ethnicity and culture of a class, in which students
with different linguistic and socio-cultural characteristics study. The term “intercultural competence”
refers to the creation of feelings, behaviors and opinions of a person, towards the “other”, through his
education, and it is possible to be inuenced by the knowledge of their own culture and the foreign culture
respectively (Hall and Toll, 1999). Also, by the term “intercultural competence”, is meant any theoretical,
scientic, research and didactic knowledge of the teacher about cultures, languages, living conditions,
etc. of individuals who come from different countries and are integrated into the social fabric of another
country (Bobaridou-Kuneli and Georgoyiannis, 2004).
The modern social reality, characterized by uidity, increasing trend of globalization, multicultural-
ism, and competition, seeks an appropriate school and pedagogical environment which is capable of
contributing both to the harmonious integration of the student into society, and to the framing of practices
that ensure equal opportunities for both gender, people with special educational needs and abilities, but
also people with special cultural and linguistic characteristics (Markou and Parthenis, 2011).
With reference to the psychological and emotional formation of attitudes and opinions towards
multicultural school environments as well as the theoretical and practical preparation of teachers for them,
the above situations are found both in the Greek and foreign literature under the terms “inter-cultural
competence” and “intercultural readiness” (Bobaridou-Kuneli and Georgoyiannis, 2004; Spinthourakis
and Karatzia-Stavlioti, 2006; Hall and Toll, 1999). The intercultural competence and readiness of the
teacher should be the goals and conditions for the correct performance of her pedagogical activities
(Markou and Parthenis, 2011).
By “educational competence”, we mean all the necessary knowledge that the teacher must have in
order to be theoretically, scientically, research and teaching qualied. This knowledge is acquired in the
context of her education in the University Departments, but also at a later level. According to Babiniotis
(1998), teaching prociency is the certicate of teaching ability granted by a higher state body such as the
Ministry of Education, to holders of certain diplomas of a specic cognitive subject and is necessary for
the teaching of this subject (Babiniotis, 1998). The degree granted as a teaching certicate includes all
the necessary knowledge, but also the skills required by the teaching process so that the teacher is able
to cope with his educational duties (Georgoyiannis, 2009).
The term “intercultural psychology” refers to the science that investigates the degree to which the
cultural identities (both at individual and group level) of mobile populations differ, since the developing
individual is a product of social processes, but also the degree of differentiation of the prevailing national
identity of the host country (Georgoyiannis, 2009).
In the context of the new social data, there should be a redenition of education as it determines the
cultural and intellectual capital of society. According to the views of social psychology, the perceptions that
man forms about “others”, about the phenomena and things around him, derive from the mental behavior
of the system of values and norms of each culture (Markou and Parthenis, 2011). Through the process
of socialization, the individual learns to identify similarities and differences, and to assign an emotional
character to his evaluations of others. Depending on the organization of the respective social order, the
“other” can be dened as a “stranger”. “Foreigner” is dened as “one who is not foreseen as part of the
established cultural reality and can question the self-evident elements of this reality” (Govaris, 2011: 21).
According to Simone de Beauvoir (Andreou, 2011), “The category of the Other is as primordial as
consciousness itself”, and “no community is ever dened as a unit without automatically confronting it
with the Other. For the villager, everyone who does not belong to his village is “other” and suspect. For
the inhabitants of one country, the inhabitants of other countries are strangers.” The above position has
particularly attracted the interest of the social sciences, expressing the well-known distinction between “in-
groups” and “out-groups” (Andreou, 2011: 198). In the context of “in-groups”, which are also called “we”
groups, “social identities” are created, i.e. the perceptions of people, which make them experience the