www.ijcrsee.com

505

Tsankov, N. (2025). Multimodal Competence of Future Teachers – A Context of Understanding and Opportunities for

Development in University Education, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education

(IJCRSEE), 13(2), 505-513.

Original scientific paper

Received: February 13, 2025.

Revised: June 14, 2025.

Accepted: July 04, 2025.

UDC:

37.013.31

378.147

10.23947/2334-8496-2025-13-2-505-513

Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Corresponding author:

nikolay.tsankov@trakia-uni.bg

Abstract: This article explores the formation and development of multimodal competence of preservice teachers in

the context of teaching the disciplines Pedagogy of Construction and Technology Activities and Productive Activities in Techni-

cal and Technological Education in Kindergarten and in School 1st to 4th year classes. Students’ multimodal competence is

seen as a synergistic confluence of knowledge and skills related to different modes of communication - verbal, non-verbal,

visual and digital. The focus is on the skills of selecting, combining, adapting and developing multimodal educational con-

tent, integration of communication channels and technological combination of different modalities in multimodal modes. The

pilot study evaluated the feasibility of designing multimodal resources that respond to students’ ages, levels of competence,

learning styles, technological capabilities, and subject matter content, as well as creating learning environments that sup-

port students’ cognitive, social, emotional, and personal development. The article emphasizes the need to integrate this

knowledge into pedagogical practice, taking into account the ethical principles and value focuses that guide the design of

multimodal environment. The results of the study show a significant improvement in students’ skills in creating and adapt-

ing multimodal resources, and also highlight the importance of applying new technologies and artificial intelligence in the

educational process in order to develop critical thinking, creative expression and personal growth in children and students.

Keywords: multimodal competence, operationalization and development opportunities, multimodal technologies,

multimodal resources, university teacher education.

Nikolay Tsankov

Faculty of Education, Trakia University, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria, e-mail:

nikolay.tsankov@trakia-uni.bg

Multimodal Competence of Future Teachers –

A Context of Understanding and Opportunities for Development in

University Education

Introduction

In contemporary education, the multimodal competence of future teachers is essential as the edu-

cational process increasingly involves a combination of different communication modes - verbal, non-

verbal, visual and digital. Children and learners perceive information in a variety of ways, and technology

creates new opportunities for teaching that require teachers not only to be knowledgeable about different

modalities, but also to have the skills to integrate them effectively.

In the academic literature, issues related to media and information literacy have been widely dis-

cussed in recent years, not only as a foundation for the application of digital technologies in education,

but also in the context of teachers’ educational needs (Makarova and Makarova, 2018; Stanišić, Leković

and Stošić, 2019; Stosic, Dermendzhieva and Tomczyk, 2020; Simonović, 2021; Başaran, and Arık, 2022;

Vesić, Laković and Vesić, 2023; Dašić, Ilievska Kostadinović, Vlajković and Pavlović, 2024). The authors

categorically state that when we talk about raising the level of education, the most important thing is

teacher education. In order to modernize the learning process, it is necessary to introduce modern media

in the learning process (Novkovic Stošić and all, 2018: 1099).

In this context, an in-depth study of multimodal competence is necessary to understand how it

can be incorporated into the university training of future teachers, as it is considered key to pedagogical

effectiveness. This is because it enables the creation of adaptive and engaging educational resources

www.ijcrsee.com

506

Tsankov, N. (2025). Multimodal Competence of Future Teachers – A Context of Understanding and Opportunities for

Development in University Education, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education

(IJCRSEE), 13(2), 505-513.

tailored to the needs of diverse children and students (

Georgieva, 2021). Teachers who are able to inte-

grate different communication modes can create quality environments and designs in which educational

content engages learners in a more accessible and motivating way, taking into account individual learning

styles and technological capabilities. Moreover, multimodal competence helps to build critical thinking and

reflexivity in future teachers, preparing them for the dynamic and digitalized environment in which they will

be professionally realized.

The study of the level of development of multimodal competence is necessary not only because

of technological changes, but also because of the social and ethical aspects of contemporary commu-

nication. Teachers should develop an awareness of the ways in which different modalities interact and

their effects on the cognitive, social and emotional development of children and students. On the basis

of such research, university education can offer targeted and systematic methodological variants for the

development of the multimodal competence of students - future teachers, which will provide them with the

necessary knowledge, skills and attitudes for successful professional activity and competitive advantage

in an increasingly complex educational reality.

Theoretical Rationale

The theoretical propositions on multimodality as an analytic discourse represent a relatively new

direction in the scientific search for the significance of this phenomenon for the understanding of com-

munication. Conceptually, multimodality denotes the interaction between different communication modes

- verbal, nonverbal, visual and auditory - which, in aggregate, shape the meaning of messages. It reveals

the way in which semiotic resources combine and integrate in communicative processes, conditioning

not only the transmission of information but also facilitating interpretation and understanding in different

contexts. The functioning of different semiotic systems in oral, written, visual and digital communication

events, as well as the unlimited possibilities of their combination, highlight multi-modality as a key mecha-

nism of social interaction. It is the specific construct that ensures the flexibility and adaptability of com-

munication, facilitating understanding between participants in different discursive practices. In this sense,

multimodality does not simply complement communication, but significantly transforms it, expanding the

boundaries of traditional communication and creating new possibilities for the expression and perception

of content.

As a structurally defining element of communication, multimodality has existed since the dawn of hu-

man interactions, but its role is becoming more and more tangible with the dynamic development of infor-

mation technology and the intensification of global data exchange. Although the phenomenon of multimo-

dality has accompanied the development of civilization, it is the technological breakthroughs of the second

half of the 20th century that have catalyzed scientific interest in it. The diversity of communication forms

in digital and media environments makes multimodality an intersection point for various disciplinary fields

that analyze its manifestations in the social, cultural, and cognitive structures of the contemporary world.

The distinction between pragmatic, compositional and hierarchical approaches to communication

is becoming increasingly conventional as the boundaries between these analyses blur in multimodal

discourse, where the interaction between different modes of communication plays a key role (O’Halloran,

2011). In contemporary communication, meaning is no longer formed solely through isolated structural or

conceptual elements, but through their dynamic integration into a unified system that adapts to different

contexts and modes of perception.

In multimodal text, the distribution of modal resources and the tensions between them form visual

communication as a unified mechanism. This specificity allows in pedagogy interactions to simultaneously

influence “spatial perception - the ability of an individual to detect how an object is oriented according to

his or her own orientation and mental rotation - the ability of an individual to imagine both two-dimensional

and three-dimensional objects and to rotate them in relation to the visual representation of the same ob-

ject using only his or her mind” (Tasevska, 2023: 105). Whether perceived or created, multimodal design

possesses a dynamic and multi-layered nature, for one modality may temporarily dominate but is unable

to exclude the influence of others and/or ignore the contextual information they provide.

While multimodal interaction analysis focuses on the interaction between communicative elements,

considering their density, integrity, and their relationship to contextual information and aesthetic organiza-

tion (

Scollon and Scollon, 2003; Norris, 2020), as noted in previous research, critical multimodal textual

www.ijcrsee.com

507

Tsankov, N. (2025). Multimodal Competence of Future Teachers – A Context of Understanding and Opportunities for

Development in University Education, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education

(IJCRSEE), 13(2), 505-513.

analysis within semiotics focuses not so much on the structure of communicative resources themselves,

but on their social and pragmatic role in the system of codes and meanings. This distinction is particularly

relevant in the context of multi-modal competence because it emphasizes the importance of not only the

formal but also the functional side of communication. Future teacher education needs to focus on under-

standing how, through different communication modes (verbal, visual, auditory, etc.), interactants shape

the context in which they are perceived. Teachers must not only be experts at discerning different semiotic

resources, but also be able to anticipate and interpret how these resources relate to the cultural, social,

and individual contexts of children and students. The interaction of these elements in the environment re-

quires teachers to be aware and flexible in order to adapt their communication according to the dynamics

of the situation and the needs of the children and students. When we talk about multimodal competence,

it is important to bear in mind that in social and pedagogical practice not only one or two communication

channels are used.

In the multimodal approach, each resource has a unique role in expressing, specifying and making

sense of meanings. Here, the “chronological determinacy of cognitive algorithms as a system of codes

of the socialization process” (Dyankova, 2019: 59) is taken into account, which unequivocally affirms

that “there is not and cannot be a social life if it is not lived through consciousnesses that are in relations

with each other” (Tasevska, Yonkova, Boradzhieva, 2015: 8). For example, when using visual and audio-

visual elements, the teacher can create a more effective and engaging educational process by integrating

diverse communication channels that not only support but also enhance the understanding of the edu-

cational content. In this context, it is important for teachers to be able to manage and combine different

modes, taking into account the specific needs of students and the social context of learning.

Critical multimodal analysis within semiotics also highlights how social and cultural factors influence

the perception of different communication elements. That is, multimodal competence requires teachers to un-

derstand how different social groups perceive communication and how different cultures may interpret visual

and verbal messages differently. This dynamic between expressive media and social contexts is crucial for

successful teaching because it allows teachers to create inclusive and ethically sound educational practices

that take into account students’ diversity and stimulate their interest and participation in the learning process.

Previous research (Dermendzhieva and Tsankov, 2023) has focused on the formation of pedagogi-

cal competence to design multimodal educational environments that stimulate the cognitive and creative

activity of preschool children. A major emphasis is placed on the need for professional reflection of the

children’s teacher, who must work in the context of a transgressive approach. This approach involves the

integration of different forms of communication and is important for the development of skills and knowl-

edge that equip teachers to design effective learning environments. One of the main ideas is that a child

teacher’s competence in designing multimodal environments is formed and developed in the process

of continually cultivating new knowledge and skills. This involves expanding the teacher’s cognitive and

practical boundaries, which creates opportunities for better understanding and inclusion of the child in

dynamic educational processes. In this context, multi-modality, as a phenomenon of communication, is

perceived as an essential resource that allows a variety of interactions that activate children’s cognitive

and creative potential. It is theorized that when children engage in multimodal educational interactions,

they not only learn social experiences but also form a transgressive attitude that influences their behav-

ioral response. This, coupled with children’s multifaceted expression, the multilayered sign language, the

dynamic connectivity of information media, and dialogic communication with the child, creates a complex

learning environment. This environment aims at developing the visual, informational, multicultural, media

and digital experiences of preschool children, helping their holistic development in the modern world. In

the context of forming a holistic learning environment in kindergarten and school, multimodality plays an

essential role through authenticity, dynamism and multidimensionality. It overcomes the schematicism

and linearity of thinking by activating the imagination and stimulating the creative and cognitive activity of

children and students. Multimodality not only enriches social interactions, but is fundamental to the de-

velopment of cognitive and affective capacities that lead to deeper self-awareness and personal growth.

The possibility of integrating different communication modalities in the educational environment ensures

greater student engagement and increases the effectiveness of pedagogical interactions.

Previous research by the authors (

Tsankov and Dermendzhieva, 2024) examined methods for

evaluating multimodal digital resources developed by students who would become child-care and school

teachers. The evaluation of these resources is based on principles such as autonomy, coherence,

www.ijcrsee.com

508

Tsankov, N. (2025). Multimodal Competence of Future Teachers – A Context of Understanding and Opportunities for

Development in University Education, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education

(IJCRSEE), 13(2), 505-513.

groundedness and authenticity, with the ability to enrich the individual sensory experience of children

and students and to provoke their cognitive and personal activity being key indicators of their successful

application. These criteria create conditions for building resources that can enrich pedagogical interaction

by stimulating creative and non-linear thinking, both at an early age and during schooling.

The design of multimodal digital resources for the purpose of environmental composition in kin-

dergarten and school offers the possibility of creating dynamic and engaging environments that combine

cognitive, affective and sensory experiences. This combination supports children’s and students’ develop-

ment and self-awareness, while encouraging personal expression. Research highlights the importance

of appropriate education for future child teachers and teachers in different types of schools, who need to

have the skills to design multimodal digital resources. This creates dynamic and effective learning envi-

ronments that overcome imbalances between sociocultural and individual differences and optimise the

development of children and students.

The multimodal competence of future teachers is crucial for understanding and effectively using

the various communicative modes that construct meaning in the educational process. The design of

multimodal content does not simply convey information, but selects and structures meaning by combining

visual, verbal, and other means of expression to create an overall message. In this context, multimodal

communication extends the boundaries of traditional discourse, allowing for multiple layers of meaning,

personalization of ideas, and dynamic adaptation to cultural and social conditions. Understanding these

processes requires a specific research approach and toolkit to support teachers in designing educational

resources that integrate different communication modes for more effective learning and interaction.

Materials and Methods

Within the pilot study, the multimodal competence of the students - future teachers - is viewed as a

synergistic confluence of: knowledge of different modes of communication - verbal, non-verbal, visual and

digital skills: (1) to select, combine, adapt and develop multimodal educational content, (2) to integrate dif-

ferent communication channels, (3) to technologically combine different modalities in multimodal modes,

(4) to design multimodal resources according to the subjects (age characteristics, levels of competence,

learning styles), technological capabilities, subject content, expected outcomes, and cross-curricular

specifics, (5) designing multimodal resources while adhering to ethical principles and value-based fo-

cuses, (6) designing multimodal environments for cognitive, social, psychological, physical, emotional,

and personal development and opportunities for subject expressions; attitudes and dispositions toward:

(1) mode of interaction, interpenetration and complementarity of different modalities and the dynamics

and interrelationships in communication, (2) personalization of the integration of communicative modes in

multimodal communication settings.

The developed and approbated technology of forming multimodal competence for students - future

teachers - consists of several main stages, which cover both theoretical and practical knowledge and

skills. Functionally, the implemented technology is effective in two directions:

1. Regarding the quality of academic training for the students who are future pedagogical special-

ists: “The integration of digital writing tools into academic programs, combined with strategies to

promote student engagement, can lead to improved self-efficacy and ultimately better academic

performance” (

Bekturova, M., A. Zhaitapova, D. Gaipov, S. Tulepova, G. Dyankova, 2024: 616).

2. Concerning the professional-pedagogical perspective of students - future pedagogical specialists,

“it is the teacher 5.0 who will have to shift education from its technological focus and saturate it with

more opportunities for the development of students’ socio-emotional competence, which will prove

to be the key to Economy 5.0 (

Mihova, 2023: 20).

Therefore, initially, students are given a basic understanding of the different modes of communi-

cation, such as verbal, non-verbal, visual and digital, focusing on their role in the educational process.

This knowledge forms the basis for building competence in creating effective multimodal educational

resources. Then, the focus is more on the development of skills to combine, adapt and develop multi-

modal educational content. Students are taught how to integrate different communication channels and

technologically combine different modalities into multimodal ensembles. They are also introduced to the

principles of designing multimodal resources to meet students’ age, competency levels, and learning

www.ijcrsee.com

509

Tsankov, N. (2025). Multimodal Competence of Future Teachers – A Context of Understanding and Opportunities for

Development in University Education, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education

(IJCRSEE), 13(2), 505-513.

styles, as well as to match subject content and cross-curricular specifics. Technology succeeds in prepar-

ing students to design multimodal environments that not only support children/students’ cognitive and

social progress, but also stimulate their emotional and personal development. It is important for students

to learn how to create multimodal resources that adhere to ethical principles and value-based focuses

while also strengthening relationships and interactions between different communication modalities. The

goal is to develop competence for dynamic and innovative pedagogical interaction, which will support the

development of children/students in a multimodal educational environment.

The technology for the formation of multimodal competence is successfully integrated into the aca-

demic disciplines “Pedagogy of construction and technology activities” and “Productive activities in techni-

cal and technological education in kindergarten and 1-4 grade”, which significantly enriches the learning

process and develops key skills in students – future teachers. In these courses, which are aimed at

developing teachers’ practical skills for working with children in the early stages of education, technology

is implemented through the application of a greater knowledge of different communication modes - ver-

bal, non-verbal, visual and digital. Thus, students master the skills of matching and adapting multimodal

resources according to the age characteristics and technological capabilities of children and students.

As a result of the application of this technology, students actively learn methods of integrating differ-

ent communication channels and technologies that are in sync with the pedagogical goals of the disciplines.

Throughout the learning process, they design multimodal resources that foster creativity, the building of

constructivist and technological skills, and the development of children’s cognitive abilities. In each of these

disciplines, multimodal competence is seen as the basis for creating learning environments that stimulate

children’s active participation and expression while meeting their specific needs and levels of competence.

Through the formation and development of multimodal competence in these disciplines, future

teachers are able to develop and implement educational resources that are not only technologically in-

novative but also pedagogically effective. The technology for multimodal design in the disciplines “Peda-

gogy of Construction and Technology Activities” and “Productive Activities in Technical and Technological

Training” creates dynamic educational spaces that enrich children’s sensory, cognitive, and emotional

experiences. In this way, students acquire the necessary skills to create integrated educational environ-

ments that not only align with pedagogical goals but also offer opportunities for both individual and collec-

tive expression. This approach fosters children’s and students’ creative and technological engagement,

encouraging active participation and innovation in the learning process.

Results

As part of the pilot study, two groups were formed: 60 undergraduate students (full-time study) and

90 master’s students (part-time study). Initially, it was examined whether the distribution of the primary

test data at the diagnostic stage of the study was normal or not, in order to determine which statistical

methods (parametric or non-parametric) should be used. The Shapiro-Wilk test was applied for this pur-

pose. The statistical hypotheses tested were: H

– the data follow a normal distribution, and H

– the data

do not follow a normal distribution. The empirical data were subjected to statistical analysis, the results of

which are shown in the following Table No.1.

Table 1. Distribution test results (Test of Normality)

Group

Shapiro-Wilk

Statistic

Degrees of Freedom

Sig. (p-value)

The p-value indicating whether the data

significantly deviate from a normal

Bachelor’s (full-time study)

.918 60 .012

Master’s (part-time study) .876 90 .027

In the Test of Normality table, the statistical significance Sig. represents the p-value used to test the

null hypothesis (H

) that the data follow a normal distribution. For the first group of students (Bachelor’s,

full-time study), the p-value (Sig.) is 0.012, which is less than 0.05. This indicates a statistically significant

deviation from normality, meaning that the data for bachelor’s students (full-time study) do not follow a

normal distribution. For the second group of students (Master’s, part-time study), the p-value (Sig.) is

www.ijcrsee.com

510

Tsankov, N. (2025). Multimodal Competence of Future Teachers – A Context of Understanding and Opportunities for

Development in University Education, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education

(IJCRSEE), 13(2), 505-513.

0.027, which is also less than 0.05. This again suggests a statistically significant deviation from normality.

As a result, the null hypothesis (H

) is rejected, confirming that the data for master’s students (part-time

study) are also not normally distributed.

The Shapiro-Wilk test for each study group is statistically significant, i.e. p(Sig.)<0.05, which is a

reason to accept the alternative hypothesis that the data studied do not have a normal distribution and the

use of non-parametric methods of analysis is justified.

The established differences in the criteria “knowledge” and “skills” in the final study in the groups

after the application of the technological variant based on the constructivist and situational approach to

the development of multimodal competence of students in the conditions of constructivist educational

environment are presented in Table 2

The statistical interpretation of the data in terms of the degree of formation and development of

multimodal competence based on the transgressive synergetic model of competence development and

operationalized technological variant in the subject field of the academic disciplines “Pedagogy of con-

struction and technology activities” and “Productive activities in technical and technological training in

kindergarten and grades 1-4” is presented summarized and commented indicatively in view of the objec-

tives of the specific empirical study. In the context of the pilot study, the focus is on the degree of forma-

tion of skills as basic constructs of multimodal competence, as well as the possibility of their development

through the applied technological option.

When comparing the differences in the groups (B.Sc. and M.Sc.) in terms of K

, a certain difference

in favour of the M.Sc. students was found.

When comparing the results at the beginning and at the end of the study, Wilcoxon test (Wicoxon)

was again used to compare two correlated (related) samples (groups), and the decision was based on the

significance level (α), which corresponds to the empirical value of the criterion.

Table 2. Average coefficients - degree of development by criteria

Criterion

Average Coefficient –

Development Level (K

)

Average Coefficient –

Development Level (K

)

Bachelor’s Master’s

Initial Study

Final Study

Difference

(development level)

Initial Study

Final Study

Difference

(development level)

Knowledge of different communication modes

0,24 0,52 0,28 0,29 0,63 0,34

Selection, combination, adaptation, and develop-

ment of multimodal educational content

0,31 0,64 0,33 0,35 0,72 0,37

Integration of different communication channels 0,22 0,58 0,36 0,28 0,65 0,37

Technological combination of different modalities

in multimodal modes

0,30 0,52 0,22 0,45 0,85 0,40

Design of multimodal resources according to:

0,21 0,53 0,32 0,32 0,69 0,37

Subjects

0,20 0,45 0,25 0,22 0,52 0,30

Technological possibilities 0,18 0,40 0,22 0,42 0,86 0,44

Subject content 0,30 0,70 0,40 0,35 0,80 0,45

Expected results 0,25 0,75 0,50 0,40 0,85 0,45

Interdisciplinary specifics 0,12 0,35 0,23 0,20 0,42 0,22

Design of multimodal resources while adhering to

ethical principles and value focuses

0,36 0,66 0,30 0,42 0,80 0,38

Design of multimodal environments 0,18 0,68 0,50 0,22 0,86 0,64

The results of the application of the Wilcoxon test (Wicoxon) show the associated significance

level, given in the order Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed), with respect to the B.Sc. p=0.045<0.05 and with respect

www.ijcrsee.com

511

Tsankov, N. (2025). Multimodal Competence of Future Teachers – A Context of Understanding and Opportunities for

Development in University Education, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education

(IJCRSEE), 13(2), 505-513.

to the M.Sc. p=0.017<0.05, in both cases it is the basis for the conclusion that the difference between

the two scores at the beginning and end of the application of the research program, i.e. The difference

between the results at the beginning and the end of the study is statistically significant, which is the basis

for accepting the alternative hypothesis, according to which the differences observed in the empirical data

are the result of regular factors, i.e. the outcome of the applied technological option for the development

of multimodal competence of students - future teachers.

Discussions

The results of the statistical interpretation of the data show clear evidence of the effectiveness of

the applied technology for the formation and development of students’ multimodal competence in the

context of the definition of this competence as a synergistic set of knowledge and skills. In the study, the

focus is on the acquisition of different modes of communication - verbal, non-verbal, visual and digital,

and the possibility of integrating and combining these communication channels in multimodal modes.

Evidence of the effectiveness of the approach is obtained through the significant advances in students’

skills in selecting, adapting, and developing multimodal educational content, as well as in the technologi-

cal combination of different modalities in view of the specific needs of learners and the conditions of the

educational environment.

Essential to the development of multimodal competence is not only the ability to combine different

communication channels, but also to design multimodal resources in accordance with children’s age char-

acteristics, technological capabilities and the specifics of the learning content. This includes expanding the

competence of preservice teachers to design instructional resources to meet different learning styles and

different educational and ethical demands. It has been shown that students who go through this technological

option of training also develop attitudes of ethicality in the creation of multi-modal educational materials and

to ensure inclusiveness in the educational process, in line with the values and principles of modern education.

The research findings also show that the integration of different communication modes in the

context of multimodal communication leads to the development of a dynamic interaction between these

modes, each of them contributing to the possibility of a deeper perception of educational content. Stu-

dents demonstrate an increasing ability to design multimodal environments that not only stimulate the

cognitive and social development of children and students, but also provide opportunities for emotional,

psychological, and personal development. This creates the conditions for the development of a synergis-

tic process in which the different modalities interact and mutually enrich each other, and this integration

not only improves the effectiveness of learning, but also provides a more complete and realistic opportu-

nity for the formation of competence oriented to the modern multimodal world.

In order to improve the application of technology for the development of multimodal competence

of future teachers, it is necessary to strengthen the integration of the practical application of multimodal

approaches in the context of different disciplines. This can be achieved through the creation of cross-cur-

ricular projects and interactive learning scenarios that bring together knowledge and skills from different

areas of learning, such as pedagogy, technology and digital communication. Through the implementation

of such projects, students will have the opportunity to work with a variety of multimodal resources and

develop greater flexibility in their application according to the context and needs of the learners.

In addition, in order to achieve a deeper development of the skills of designing and integrating multi-

modal resources, it is necessary to introduce specific methods of reflection and self-evaluation in the learn-

ing process. Students can be engaged in creating portfolios that include their multimodal projects as well as

detailed analyses of the approaches used in them. Through such reflection, they will have the opportunity

not only to evaluate the results of their work, but also to become aware of how different communication

channels can be combined and adapted according to the requirements of the specific educational situation.

Finally, in order to improve the ethical aspect of multimodal technology implementation, it is important

to strengthen learning initiatives that promote awareness of the ethical and social implications of using digi-

tal technologies in education. This includes the development of courses and workshops focused on issues

of copyright, digital security and inclusivity in the educational process. Students must be prepared to create

multimodal resources that are not only technologically sophisticated, but also aligned with ethical standards

and values that ensure equitable access to knowledge and learning for all children and students.

The creation of multimodal resources enriches the educational process by integrating different

www.ijcrsee.com

512

Tsankov, N. (2025). Multimodal Competence of Future Teachers – A Context of Understanding and Opportunities for

Development in University Education, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education

(IJCRSEE), 13(2), 505-513.

forms of communication - text, images, video, sound and interactive elements, which stimulates different

channels of perception and learning. Artificial intelligence (AI) provides significant opportunities to adapt

these resources to the individual needs of children and students, automating the processes of creating

and personalising learning content. AI can analyze children/students’ progress and generate dynamic

and personalized learning experiences that change depending on their development and learning style.

Despite these capabilities, there is a need for a concerted effort to build the skills to use AI effectively in

the educational process. This includes both developing the technical competence to work with new tech-

nologies, and promoting critical thinking, ethical attitudes and responsibility in the use of AI in learning to

ensure equal access and maximum benefits for all children and students, in the context not only of the

classroom but also of the wider educational process

Conclusions

The overall research focuses on the formation and development of multimodal competence in

future teachers, applying a synergistic approach combining different modes of communication - verbal,

non-verbal, visual and digital. Through a pilot study in the context of the educational disciplines “Peda-

gogy of Construction and Technology Activities” and “Productive Activities in Technical and Technological

Education in Kindergarten and Grades 1-4”, the possibility of developing these competencies through

specialized technologies is explored. The focus is on the skills of creating, adapting and integrating multi-

modal resources as core components of competence, which include both technological and pedagogical

skills for personalizing the educational process.

The results of the study show a statistically significant improvement in the skills of creating and

integrating multimodal resources among students, which is confirmed through a comparative analysis of

data before and after the implementation of the research methodology. The use of statistical tools, such as

Wilcoxon’s Test, demonstrates the success of the proposed technology for the development of multimodal

competence, confirmed by the positive changes in both undergraduate and graduate students. This sup-

ports the thesis that the application of the transgressive synergistic model in education can effectively

develop key skills needed to create innovative and dynamic educational resources.

Despite the results, the study highlights the need for focused efforts to continue to build skills in

working with new technologies, including artificial intelligence. In order to maximise the benefits of these

technologies, it is important that teachers are equipped to use them ethically and responsibly, while de-

veloping the skills to think critically and apply innovation to the educational process.

Acknowledgements

This study is financed by the European Union-Next Generation EU, in the frames of the National

Recovery and Resilience Plan of the Republic of Bulgaria, first pillar “Innovative Bulgaria”, through the

Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science (MES), Project № BG-RRP-2.004-0006-C02 “Development

of research and innovation at Trakia University in service of health and sustainable well-being”, subproject

“Digital technologies and artificial intelligence for multimodal learning – a transgressive educational per-

spective for pedagogical specialists” № Н001-2023.47/23.01.2024.

The author would like to express their gratitude to the respondents who participated in the research

and the reviewers whose constructive suggestions significantly enhanced the quality of this work.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Bekturova, М., A. Zhaitapova, D. Gaipov, S. Tulepova, G. Dyankova (2024). Digital tools and academic writing: a moderated

mediation model of writing self-efcacy. The journal of teaching English for specic and academic purposes, 12(3),

609−618. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP240821047B

Dašić, D., Ilievska Kostadinović, M., Vlajković, M., & Pavlović, M. (2024). Digital Literacy in the Service of Science and Scien-

tic Knowledge. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 12(1),

219–227. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2024-12-1-219-227

www.ijcrsee.com

513

Tsankov, N. (2025). Multimodal Competence of Future Teachers – A Context of Understanding and Opportunities for

Development in University Education, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education

(IJCRSEE), 13(2), 505-513.

Dermendzhieva, S., N. Tsankov (2023). Designing a multimodal environment for cognitive and creative activity in pre-school

education – competence of the teacher. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Ed-

ucation (IJCRSEE), 11(2), (351-358). https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2023-11-2-351-358

Dyankova, G. (2019). Slovesnata deistvenost na uchitelya I prosocialnoto povedenie na deteto. [The teacher’s verbal effective-

ness and the child’s prosocial behavior]. Veliko Tarnovo: European Information Center.

Georgieva, D. (2021). Development of Communicative Skills in Children with Multiple Disorders through the Method of

Facili-

tated Communication. Pedagogy, 93(2), 201-222. https://doi.org/10.53656/ped2021-2.04

Makarova, A. E., & L. Makarova, E. (2018). Blending Pedagogy And Digital Technology To Transform Educational Environment.

International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 6(2), 57–66.

https://

doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1802057M

Mihova, M. (2023). Akcenti v profesionalnata kompetentnost na uchitelya v konteksta na ideyata za versiite (1.0, 2.0, …) [Ac-

cents in the professional competence of the teacher in the context of the idea of versions (1.0, 2.0, …)]. Education:

classicism and modernity. Veliko Tarnovo: University Press “St. St. Cyril and Methodius”. https://www.univt-vratsa.com/

wp-content/uploads/2024/06/VRACA-12_2023.pdf

Norris, S. (2020). Multimodal Interaction Analysis. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.

wbeal0814.pub2

Novkovic, B., Stošić, L., Belousova, A. (2018). Media and Information Literacy -the Basis for Applying Digital Technologies

in Teaching from the Discourse of Educational Needs of Teachers. Croatian Journal of Education. 20(4), 1089-1114

https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v20i4.3001

O’Halloran, K. (2011). Multimodal Discourse Analysis. In K. Hyland and B. Paltridge (eds.) Companion to Discourse, London:

Continuum: 120-137.

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/40301

Scollon, R., & Wong Scollon, S. (2003). Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. Routledge. https://doi.

org/10.4324/9780203422724

Simonović, N. (2021). Teachers’ Key Competencies for Innovative Teaching. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Sci-

ence, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 9(3), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2021-9-3-331-345

Stanišić, T., Leković, M., & Stošić, L. (2019). Relationship between the quality of higher education and Balkan countries’ com-

petitiveness. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 7(3),

49-59. https://doi.org/10.5937/IJCRSEE1903049S

Stosic, L., Dermendzhieva, S., & Tomczyk, L. (2020). Information and communication technologies as a source of education.

World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 12(2), 128-135. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v12i2.4815

Tasevska, D. (2023). Rolya na videoigrite vyrhu mentalnata rotaciya I kratkosrochnata pamet. [Role of video games on mental

rotation and short-term memory]. Diogenes Library – Psychology, 31(1). Veliko Tarnovo: University Publishing House

“St. Cyril and Methodius”. https://doi.org/10.54664/BZME3447

Tasevska, D., Yonkova K., E. Boradzhieva (2015). Praktiki na komunikativnata tehnologiya vyv Visheto ucilishte. [Practices of

communicative technology in higher education: traditions and innovation]. Diogenes Library – Psychology, 23(1). Veliko

Tarnovo: University Publishing House “St. Cyril and Methodius”.

Tor, D., Başaran, S. D. & Arık, E. (2022). Examining of the Digital Literacy Level of Teacher Candidates. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi

Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, [online] 23(2), 2027-2064.

https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.1047590

Tsankov, N., S. H. Dermendjieva (2024). Designing Digital Resources for Multimodal Composition in the Kindergarten Environ-

ment. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 12(2), 489-496).

https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2024-12-2-489-496

Vesić, D., Laković, D., & Vesić, S. L. (2023). Use of Information Technologies in Higher Education From The Aspect of Manage-

ment. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 11(1), 143-151.

https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2023-11-1-143-151