The Order in The Structure of Motives of Activity: Quantitative Description

Authors

  • Yulia Mochalova Faculty of Psychology, Pedagogy and Defectology, Don State Technical University, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0095-7518

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2021-9-3-369-374

Keywords:

activity, motive, system, structure, structure order, model validity

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to conduct an empirical verification of the validity of the theoretical assumption that there is an order in the structure of motives of activity, which is determined by the proportionality between the significance of each motive in their aggregate significance and is quantitatively manifested in the parameters of the hyperbolic H-distribution ranked by the parameter. The necessary conditions for solving this problem are highlighted: a) structural elements - weakly functionally dependent on each other motives; b) in the structure of motives, the functional significance of each has a quantitative expression, which must be measured through the organization of empirical research; c) the measure of the total functional significance of all motives is limited by the situation of activity and the costs of obtaining its product. On a sample of students of the first, second, third, fourth courses of technical and humanitarian specialties (N=860) using the method of subjective assessment of the significance of each of the three motives for studying at the university in their combined significance (“acquisition of knowledge”; “mastering a profession”; “obtaining a diploma”) and using a given level of the average error of approximation of empirical results with an H-distribution of 10%, it was found that statistically, at a level of error probability less than 20%, students with an average error below a given level predominate. The possible formal and substantive reasons that led to a decrease in the validity of the result are named. The interpretation of the results in the context of the “junction” of systems theory and activity theory is presented. The directions of further research in the context of the proposed model are determined.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arapov, M., & Shrejder, Y. (1978). Zakon cipfa i princip dissimmetrii sistem [Zipf’s law and system dissymmetry principle]. Semiotics and informatics, 10, 74-95.

Badmaeva, N. T. (2004). Motivation of mental activity: a monograph. Publishing House of VSSTU. Retrieved from http://window.edu.ru/resource/940/18940/files/Mtdusc10.pdf

Bartholomew, D. J. (1982). Stochastic Models for Social Processes (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics - Applied Probability and Statistics Section) (3rd ed.). Wiley. Retrieved from https://scask.ru/r_book_stsc.php

Bertalanffy L. von. (1969). General Theory of Systems - critical review. George Braziller, lnc

Dorofeev, V. A. (2019). A systematic view of the problem of trust in the manager in the organization. Azimuth of Scientific Research: Pedagogy and Psychology, 8(1(26)), 113–117. Retrieved from https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_37130010_66657540.pdf

Dorofeev, V. A., & Mochalova, J. A. (2015). Symmetry – Asymmetry of Generic Structure Order of the “Worldview” as Seen by the Russians, Italians and Frenchmen. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4), 419. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s1p419

Gerasimov, A. V. (2002). Motivation to work in the context of the theory of psychological systems. Siberian Psychological Journal, 16–17, 13–17. Retrieved from http://journals.tsu.ru/psychology/&journal_page=archive&id=1402&article_id=27911

Gordeeva, T. O. (2013). Motivation of educational activity of schoolchildren and students: structure, mechanisms, conditions of development: Reglet. Retrieved from https://viewer.rusneb.ru/ru/rsl01005533356?page=1&rotate=0&theme=white

Gurina, R. V. (2017). On inclusion of cenological knowledge in education. Professional Education in the Modern World, 7(3), 1246–1252. https://doi.org/10.15372/pemw20170315

Ilyin, E. P. (2015). Motivation and motives. Peter. Retrieved from https://www.universalinternetlibrary.ru/book/46471/ogl.shtml

Ivannikov, V. A. (2014). Analysis of motivation from the viewpoint of the activity theory. National Psychological Journal, 13(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2014.0105

Kudrin, B. I. (2002). Mathematics of cenoses: species, rank-type, rank-by-parameter hyperbolic H-distributions and the laws of Lotka, Zipf, Pareto, Mandelbrot. Philosophical Foundations of Technetics. Novomoskovsk: Center for System Research., 19, 357–413. Retrieved from http://www.kudrinbi.ru/public/10524/index.htm

Leontiev, A. N. (1983). The chosen ones psychological works (V. V. Davydov & V. P. Zinchenko, Eds.). Pedagogy. Retrieved from http://yanko.lib.ru/books/psycho/leontyev-psychology.htm

Leontiev, D. A. (1993). The system-semantic nature and functions of the motive. Bulletin of the Moscow University, 14(2), 73–82.

Leontiev, V. G. (2002). Motivation and psychological mechanisms of its formation: monograph. Novosibirsk: Publishing house “Novosibirsk Polygraph Combine”.

Leontiev, D. A. (2016). A. N. Leontiev’s concept of motive and the issue of the quality of motivation. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 2016(2), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.11621/vsp.2016.02.03

Orlov, Y. M. (1984). Need-motivational factors of the effectiveness of educational activities of university students. Retrieved from http://childpsy.ru/upload/dissertations/%CE%F0%EB%EE%E2_%DE_%CC_2_1984.htm

Pareto, V. (2007). Compendio di sociologia generale / a cura di G. Farina. [Compendium of general sociology / edited by G. Farina] Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics. Retrieved from https://id.hse.ru/data/2010/11/03/1223348293/1.3.pdf

Published

2021-12-20

How to Cite

Mochalova, Y. (2021). The Order in The Structure of Motives of Activity: Quantitative Description. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 9(3), 369–374. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2021-9-3-369-374