The Role of Action Research in Teachers’ Professional Development

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2021-9-3-301-317

Keywords:

action research, reflexive practice, science education, lifelong learning, empirical research

Abstract

The challenges of contemporary education and teaching profession have resulted in an increased demand for the appropriate professional advancement and practice-based research. The action research is an approach that encourages teachers to manage and control their own work. This research was conducted with the purpose of being primarily beneficial for primary and secondary school teachers. The empirical research presented in this paper was based on the factor analysis, by which the research factors were extracted, as well as on the examination of the teachers’ attitudes towards methodological education, cognition and metacognition in teaching, reflexive practice, science education and lifelong learning in the context of the action research. The method used was descriptive together with the scaling technique and the five-level Likert scale (AISE) consisting of 29 items. The research was realized in 2020, and then retested in 2021. The number of 1021 teachers from the Republic of Serbia participated in this research. The research results showed statistically significant differences in the respondents’ responses related to the independent research variables: education cycle, teaching experience and the number of professional development seminars attended. The significance of action researches is reflected in the fact that the problems are resolved by the teachers themselves, not the scholars or academics who are not directly involved in teaching. Therefore, this research contributes to a greater motivation and support of teachers to raise their classroom activities and accomplishments to the level of a scientific research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Balashov, E., Pasicichnyk, I. & Kalamazh, R.(2021). Metacognitive awareness and academic self-regulation of HEI students, International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 9(2), 161-172. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2021-9-2-161-172

Bolton, G. (2010). Reflective practice: Writing and professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.co.uk/Reflective-Practice-Gillie-Bolton/dp/184860212X

Burnaford, G. (2011). “Experienced Educators and Practitioner Research: The Challenge for University Graduate Programs,” in Practitioner Research in Teacher Education: Theory and Best Practices, edited by I. M. Saleh and M. S. Khine, pp. 307–324. Emirates College for Advanced Education. United Arab Emirates & Frankfurt: Peter. Retrieved from https://www.perlego.com/book/1994918/practitioner-research-in-teacher-education-theory-and-best-practices-pdf

Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York: Routledge Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Doing-Action-Research-in-English-Language-Teaching-A-Guide-for-Practitioners/Burns/p/book/9780415991452

Capone R., D’Acunto I., Del Sorbo M.R., Del Regno F. & Tortoriello F. S. (2016). Action research: a new perspective in math and science education. New perspectives in science education. Italy: Universuty of Salerno. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311734341_Action_research_a_new_perspective_in_math_and_science_education

Eilks, I. (2018). Action Research in Science Education: A twenty-years personal perspective. Action Research and Innovation in Science Education, 1(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.12973/arise/98909

Eilks, I., Naaman. M., R. & Rauch, F. (2012). Action Research for innovations and Continuous Professional Development (CPD) in science education. In book: Inquiry-based science education in Europe: Reflections from the profile project Chapter: 3.7, Berlin. Retrieved from http://www.profiles-project.eu/res/Conference_2012/PROFILES_Book_final_October2012.pdf

Elliott, J. (2007). Reflecting where the action is: The selected works of John Elliott. London: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Reflecting-Where-the-Action-Is-The-Selected-Works-of-John-Elliott/Elliott/p/book/9780415369930

Farrell, T. S. C. (2004). Reflective practice in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Retrieved from https://us.corwin.com/en-us/nam/book/reflective-practice-action

Fidelman, A. & Capobianco, B. (2000). Action Research in Science Education. ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education, 1-4. Retrieved from https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/ERIC-ED463944/pdf/ERIC-ED463944.pdf

Fulmer, G. W., Chu, H. E., & Martin, S. N. (2018). The potential of teacher-led research: teachers’ action research collaborations in science education in Singapore. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 4(7), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-018-0024-5

Glanz, J. (2016). Action Research by Practitioners: A Case Study of a High Schools attempt to Create Transformational Change. Journal of Practitioner Research, 1(1), 1-23. http://doi.org/10.5038/2379-9951.1.1.1027

Goodnough, K. (2003). Facilitating action research in the context of science education: reflections of a university researcher. Educational Action Research, 11(1), 41-64. http://doi.org/10.1080/09650790300200203

Hairon, S. (2017). Action research in Singapore: where are we now? Asia-Pacific Science Education, 3(1:5), 1-18. http://doi.org/1186/s41029-017-0016-x

Jay, J. K. & Johnson, K. L. (2002). Capturing complexity: A typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teacher and Teacher Education, 18, 73-85. Retrieved from https://teachsource.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/jay-and-johnson-on-reflection.pdf

Kayapinar, U. (2013). Discovering expatriate reflective practitioners. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 14(4), 435-451. http://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2013.806297

Kavousi, F. (2016). Influence of Action Research on Meta-Cognitive Knowledge of Primary School Teachers in the Province of Alborz. International journal of humanities and cultural studies, 328-336, Tunisia: University of Gafsa. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1250763.pdf

Kember, D. (2000). Action Learning and Action Research: improving the quality of teaching and learning. London, Kogan Page. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203016343

Lustick, D. (2009). The Failure of Inquiry: Preparing Science Teachers with an Authentic Investigation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 583-604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9149-4

McNiff, J. & Whitehead, J. (2005). Action Research for Teachers. London, Fulton. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203462393

Noffke, S. & B. Somekh (2009). Handbook of educational action research. London: Sage. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857021021

Tindowen, D. J., Guzman, J. & Macanang, D. (2019). Teachers’ Conception and Difficulties in Doing Action Research. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(8),1787-1794. http://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070817

Šteh, B., Kalin, J., & Mažgon, J. (2021). Partnership Between Teachers and School Counsellors for Quality Learning and Work in the Community. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 9(2), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2021-9-2-147-159

Vaughan, M. & Burnaford, G. (2016). Action research in graduate teacher education: A review of the literature 2000-2015. Educational Action Research, 24(2), 280-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1062408

Published

2021-12-20

How to Cite

Osmanović Zajić, J., Mamutović, A., & Maksimović, J. (2021). The Role of Action Research in Teachers’ Professional Development. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 9(3), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2021-9-3-301-317

Most read articles by the same author(s)