CONCEPTUAL CHALLENGES IN UNDERSTANDING INNOVATIVE EDUCATION IN ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT

Authors

  • Klarin Mikhail Laboratory for Didactics (General Theory of Education), Institute for Strategy of Education Development, Russian Academy of Education, Moscow

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/IJCRSEE1601067K

Keywords:

adult and continuing education, innovative education, collective learner, transformative education

Abstract

The paper suggests shifts in educational thinking about adult and continuing education practices including: goal setting, nature of the learner, character of education, and its elements including the sources in the educational process, evaluation of its outcomes, and social (micro-social) role of education. The author explores innovative vs. conventional adult learning, and introduces several new approaches to adult education. Several conceptual challenges (paradoxes) are considered that do not fit the traditional educationalist’s thinking. The conceptual shifts are explored as cognitive gaps, leading to insights about the nature of adult education, and pragmatic changes in shaping education to transform individual and collective experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Botkin, J. W., Elmandjra, M., & Malitza, M. (2014). No Limits to Learning: Bridging the Human Gap: The Report to the Club of Rome. Elsevier.

Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning.Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches, 1, 1-15.

Garvin, D. A. (2003). Learning in action: A guide to putting the learning organization to work. Harvard Business Review Press.

Кларин, М. В. (2016, in press). Инновационные модели обучения: исследование мирового опыта. Монография. Москва, Луч. (in Russian).

Кларин, М. В. (2015). Инновационное обучение в образовании взрослых. Проблемы современного образования. Интернет-журнал, 4, 5-27. (in Russian).

Кларин, М. В. (2014). Инновационное образование: дидактический анализ. Педагогика. 6, 32–39. (in Russian).

Knowles, M. S. (1984). Andragogy in action (pp. 1-21). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Kraevskij, V. V., & Lerner, I. Y. (1984). The Theory of Curriculum Content in the USSR. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 7, place de Fontenoy, 75700 Paris, France.

Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2000). The knowing-doing gap: how smart companies turn knowledge into action. Organizational Dynamics, 1(29), 76-77.

Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge.

Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline (re-print 1992). London, Century Business.

Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization science, 13(3), 339-351.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-30

How to Cite

Mikhail, K. (2016). CONCEPTUAL CHALLENGES IN UNDERSTANDING INNOVATIVE EDUCATION IN ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 4(1), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.5937/IJCRSEE1601067K