Conceptual Predictors of The Adolescents With Different Cognition Types Intellectual Activity


  • Irina Kibalchenko Department of psychology and life safety, Federal State-Owned Educational Autonomy Establishment of Higher Education «Southern Federal University», Taganrog, Russian Federation
  • Tatiana Eksakusto Department of psychology and life safety, Federal State-Owned Educational Autonomy Establishment of Higher Education «Southern Federal University», Taganrog, Russian Federation
  • Oksana Istratova Department of psychology and life safety, Federal State-Owned Educational Autonomy Establishment of Higher Education «Southern Federal University», Taganrog, Russian Federation



conceptual structures, intellectual activity, cognition, adolescents


Such predictors of intellectual activity as categoric, conceptual and semantic ones are analyzed in the article; the analysis is aimed at defining structural peculiarities of the adolescents’ conceptual predictors exemplified by the adolescents with open-minded, closed-minded and neutral (mixed) cognition. Design of the research can be defined as a deductive-correlated one. The research is based on mixed-method studies, containing qualitative and quantitative methods of the data processing and interpreting. Principal Component analysis (PCA) as well as the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test (IBM SPSS Statistics) allowed us to find out peculiarities of the adolescents with different cognition types intellectual activity conceptual predictors. The average value of the factor structures summary dispersion and differences in predictors significance values from p≤0.01 to p≤0.05 reflects the veracity of the research results. The research proves that adolescents with open-minded cognition are characterized by well-developed long-term semantic memory, i.e. they are able to generate more ideas (Hemp. = 12.082, р≤0.01), their categoric abilities are highly developed (Hemp. = 13.764, р≤0.01). Factor structure in this group of adolescents is a sign of conceptual abilities and conceptual predictors systems integration. The level of cognition openness is one of the basic characteristics of intellectual success. The attained statistic results prove that there are great differences between structural peculiarities of the adolescents with different cognition types intellectual activity conceptual predictors; the results of the research are as well indicatives of the fact that intellectual activity of adolescents with different cognition types is conditioned by the conceptual predictors structure.


Download data is not yet available.


Ackerman, P. L. (2017). Adult Intelligence: The Construct and the Criterion Problem. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 987–998.

Austerberry, C., Fearon, P., Ronald, A., Leve, L. D., Ganiban, J. M., Natsuaki, M. N., ... & Reiss, D. (2022) Early manifestations of intellectual performance: Evidence that genetic effects on later academic test performance are mediated through verbal performance in early childhood. Child development, 93(2), 188–206.

Briggs, Ann R.J., Coleman, M. & Morrison, M. (Eds.). (2012). Research methods in educational leadership and management. London SAGE Publications Ltd, 432.

Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J. & Hamaker, C. (2000). Intellectual ability, learning style, personality, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(6), 1057-1068.

Goryunova, N. B. & Druzhinin, V. N. (2000). Операциональные дескрипторы ресурсной модели общего интеллекта [Operational descriptors of a general intelligence resource model]. Психологический журнал, 21(4), 57–64. Retrieved from:

Hülür, G., Gasimova, F., Robitzsch, A. & Wilhelm, O. (2018) Change in Fluid and Crystallized Intelligence and Student Achievement: The Role of Intellectual Engagement. Child Development, 89(4), 1074-1087.

Kholodnaya, M. A, Trifonova, A. V., Volkova, N. E. & Sipovskaya, Y. I. (2019). Методики диагностики понятийных способностей [Methods of the conceptual abilities diagnostics]. Экспериментальная психология, 12(3), 105-118.

Kholodnaya, M. A. & Sipovskaya Y. I (2021). Elements of Sensory-Emotional Experience as an Integral Part of Forming Visual Meanings: The Role of Conceptual Abilities. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 14(2), 86-100.

Kholodnaya, M. A. (2012). Психология понятийного мышления: от концептуальных структур к понятийным способностям [Psychology of conceptual thinking: from conceptual structures to conceptual abilities]. Москва: Издательство Когито-Центр, 288. ISBN 978-5-9270-0240-5. Retrieved from:

Kholodnaya, M. A. (2015). Интеллект, креативность, обучаемость: ресурсный подход (о развитии идей В.Н. Дружинина) Intelligence, creativity, teachability: resource-based view (V.N. Druzhinin’s ideas development). Психологический журнал, 36(5), 5-14. Retrieved from: item.asp?id=24376982

Kholodnaya, M. A. (2019). Психология интеллекта. Парадоксы исследования [Psychology of intelligence. Antinomies in research]. 3 издание, переработанное и дополненное. Москва: “Издательство ЮРАЙТ”, 334. ISBN 978-5-534-07365-2. Retrieved from:

Kibal’chenko, I. & Eksakusto, T. (2020). Cognitive and style predictors of the students’ psychological wellbeing. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 8(1), 1-13.

Klimontova, Т. А. (2010). Открытость внутреннего мира учащихся с явной и скрытой формой интеллектуальной одаренности [The openness of the inner world of explicitly and latently gifted children]. Психологическая наука и образование, 2, 36-43. Retrieved from:

Larkina, A. A. & Anufriev, А.F. (2021). Уровень развития познавательной сферы как причина успешности – не успешности в учебной деятельности [The level of cognitive sphere development as a reason of being successful/unsuccessful in an educational activity]. Материалы всероссийской научно-теоретической конференции «Современные технологии в образовании: актуальные проблемы и тенденции». Москва, 15–17 июля, 113-118. Retrieved from:

Lavrijsen, J., Preckel, F., Verachtert, P., Vansteenkiste, M. & Verschueren, K. (2021). Are motivational benefits of adequately challenging schoolwork related to students’ need for cognition, cognitive ability, or both? Personality and Individual Differences, 171,110558.

Levich, S. N., Marchenko, L. O. & Filippova E. O. (2019). Интеллектуальные способности как предикторы развития профессионального мышления [Intellectual abilities as predictors of professional thinking development]. Психология XXI века: Организация психологической службы в образовательных учреждениях: Сборник материалов XV международной научно-практической конференции. Санкт-Петербург, 28–29 ноября 2019, 106-111. Retrieved from:

Litvinov, A. V. & Ivolina, T.V. (2013). Метакогниция: понятие, структура, связь с интеллектуальными когнитивными способностями [Metacognition: concept, structure, association with intellect and cognitive processes]. Современная зарубежная психология, 2(3), 59-70. Retrieved from:

Madrid, H. P. & Patterson, M.G. (2016). Creativity at work as a joint function between openness to experience, need for cognition and organizational fairness. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 409-416.

Maryutina Т.М., Ermolaev O.Yu., & Trubnikov V.I. (1998). О природе психологических предикторов [About the nature of psychological predictors]. Психологическая наука и образование, 3(1), 27-35. Retrieved from:

Morosanova, V. I., Fomina, T. G., & Kovas, Y. V. (2014). Взаимосвязь регуляторных, интеллектуальных и когнитивных особенностей учащихся с математической успешностью [The relationship between regulatory, intellectual and cognitive characteristics in students who are successful in mathematics]. Психологические исследования, 7(34), 11.

Norman, E. & Furnes, B. (2016). The relationship between metacognitive experiences and learning: Is there a difference between digital and non-digital study media? Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 301-309.

Pavlova, E. M. (2018). Модель связей самооценки креативности и интеллекта с толерантностью к неопределенности и креативностью [Model of connections between self-esteem of creativity and intelligence, tolerance of uncertainty and creativity]. Психология. Журнал высшей школы экономики, 15(1), 69-78.

Postavnev, V. M., Postavneva, I. V., Dvoinin А. М. & Romanova М. А. (2020). Общие и частные когнитивные способности как предикторы академическойуспешности ребенка на ранних этапах образования [Predictors of the child’s academic success in the early stages of education]. Вестник Московского городского педагогического университета. Серия: Педагогика и психология, 4, 64-73.

Puente-Díaza, R., Arroyo, J. C., Puerta, L. & Vargas-Barrera, F. (2022). The contribution Openness to Experience and its two aspects to the explanation of idea generation, evaluation and selection: A metacognitive perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 185(3), 111240.

Pufal-Struzik, I. (1995). Self-actualization in gifted and aggressive young people. European Journal of High Ability, 6(1), 53-59.

Ratu, A., Rai, N. G. M. & Savitri, E. D. (2021). Excellent academic achievement: Do intellectual humility and emotional intelligence matter. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(2).

Savin, E. Yu. (2004). Понятийный и метакогнитивный опыт как основа интеллектуальной компетентности в научной деятельности [Conceptual and metacognitive experience as the basis for intellectual competency in scientific activity]. Психологический журнал, 25(5), 50-60. Retrieved from:

Schuster, C., Stebner, F., Leutner, D. & Wirth, J. (2020). Transfer of metacognitive skills in self-regulated learning: an experimental training study. Metacognition and Learning, 15(3), 455-477.

Shadrikov, V. (2019). К новой психологической теории способностей и одаренности [To new psychological theory of abilities and giftedness]. Психологический журнал, 40(2), 15-26.

Shanqaiti, Al. & Farea, M. (2021). The Impact of Transformational Leadership Factors on Project Progress and which Factor has Significant Influence and Great Contribution towards Project Success. Webology. 18(Special Issue 04), 1389 - 1412.

Shcheblanova, E. I. (2011). Неуспешные одаренные школьники [Unsuccessful gifted school-children]. М.: БИНОМ. Лаборатория знаний, 245. Retrieved from:

Stephan, Y. (2009). Openness to experience and active older adults’ life satisfaction: A trait and facet-level analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(6). 637-641.

Tikhomirova, T. N., Misozhnikova, E. B. & Malykh, S. B. (2020). Когнитивные и регуляторные предикторы успешности выполнения тестов общих способностей в старшем дошкольном возрасте [Cognitive and regulatory predictors of success in general ability tests in preschool years]. Сибирский психологический журнал, 75, 97–114.

Veenman, M. V. J. & Verheij, J. (2003). Technical student’ metacognitive skills: Relating general vs. specific metacognitive skills to study success. Learning and Individual Differences, 13(3), 259-272.

Vladimirov I. Yu., Podshivalenko I. A. & Smirnitskaya A. V. (2021). Предикторы успешности обучения студентов-математиков [Predictors of learning success for mathematics students]. Ярославский психологический вестник, 3, 115-120. Retrieved from:

Volkova, E. V. (2016). Технологии развития ментальных ресурсов [Technologies of mental resources development]. Москва : Институт психологии РАН, 256. Retrieved from:

Zalegay, V. I. (2014) Семантическое пространство учебного текста как средство развития открытой познавательной позиции старшеклассника [Semantic field of an educational text used for a senior high-school student open-minded cognition development]. Педагогическое мастерство: материалы IV Международной научной конференции. Москва, февраль 2014. М.: Буки-Веди, 111-113. Retrieved from:

Zirenko, M. S. (2018). Имплицитные теории интеллекта и личности: отношения к интеллекту, мотивации и личности [Implicit theories of intelligence and personality: Relations to intelligence, motivation and personality]. Психология. Журнал высшей школы экономики, 15(1), 39 – 53.



How to Cite

Kibalchenko, I., Eksakusto, T., & Istratova, O. (2022). Conceptual Predictors of The Adolescents With Different Cognition Types Intellectual Activity. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 10(1), 93–105.