Reflexive Competence in Metacognitive Monitoring of Learning Activity of HEI Students
Keywords:reflexivity, reflexive competence, self-regulation, metacognitive monitoring, learning activity
The manuscript presented here reports the theoretical aspects of the concepts of reflexive competence and reflexivity, which is considered, in learning activities through a prism of metacognitive monitoring of HEI students. An essence of metacognitive monitoring and reflexive competence has been theoretically studied. The role of reflexive competence and its components in the process of metacognitive monitoring of the educational activities of students of HEIs has been described. Reflexive competence at the metacognitive level is viewed as a system of formed reflexive abilities, which ensures high productivity of the intellectual activity of the subject by activating the metacognitive resources that are necessary and organizing reflexive actions. The results of empirical research with the use of questionnaire “Reflexive skills (cognitive and metacognitive level scales) (O. Savchenko), Methodology “Reflexive strategies of task solution” (O. Savchenko and M. Makiienko), Metacogntive Awareness Inventory - MAI (G. Scraw and R. Dennison) and “Methodology of Self-Evaluation of Metacognitive Knowledge and Metacognitive Activeness” (M. Kashapov & Y. Skvortsova), and correlation analysis with the use of ANOVA analysis of variance and Spearmen’s rank correlation coefficient, have proved that student’s overconfidence can cause mistakes in the evaluation of the results of the work. Senior students have better indicators of reflexive skills at the metacognitive level and more sophisticated reflexive problem-solving strategies. Thus, the results indicate that senior students have a higher level of reflexive skills at the metacognitive and cognitive levels and a higher level of reflexive problem-solving strategies than the first- and second-year students.
Andrade, H. L., & Heritage, M. (2017). Using formative assessment to enhance learning, achievement, and academic self-regulation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623856
Avhustiuk, M. (2016). Psychological Peculiarities of Objectivity of Metacognitive Monitoring. Actual Issues of Development of Education and Science under Conditions of Globalization. Materials of All-Ukrainian Scientific Conference. Dnipro: Royal Print, 35–37. Retrieved from http://www.dnu.dp.ua/docs/zbirniki/fsnm/program_5a1d359d68327.pdf
Babaian, Y. (2014). Structure of Reflexive Competence of Teacher of Higher School. Scientific Bulletin of O. Sukhomlynskyi Mykolaiv National University. Series “Psychological Sciences”, 2(13), 22–26.
Balashov, E. (2019). Psychological characteristics of metacognitive monitoring in student learning activities. Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series “Psychological Sciences”, 4, 64–71. https://doi.org/10.32999/ksu2312-3206/2019-4-8
Balashov, E., Pasichnyk, I., & Kalamazh, R. (2018). Self-Monitoring and Self-Regulation of University Students in Text Comprehension. Psycholinguistics, 24(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2018-24-1-47-62
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
Bembenutty, H., Kitsantas, A., & Cleary, T. J. (Eds.). (2013). Applications of selfregulated learning across diverse disciplines: A tribute to Barry J. Zimmerman. IAP.
Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2013). The role of social media in self-regulated learning. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 9(2), 256-273. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWBC.2013.053248
Dotsevych, T. I. (2014). Rozroblennia i aprobatsiia opytuvalnyka pedahohichnoi refleksyvnosti vykladacha vyshchoi shkoly [Designing and approbation of questionnaire of reflexivity of a HEI teacher]. Psykholohichni perspektyvy–Psychological Perspectives, 23, 99-112.
Dovhaliuk, T. & Voloshyna, V. (2015). Poniattia myslennia yak metakohnityvnoho protsesu u psykholohichnii nautsi [Concept of Thinking as Metacognitive Process in Psychological Science]. Molodyi vchenyi–Young Scientist, 10(25), 184-188. Retrieved from http://molodyvcheny.in.ua/files/journal/2015/10/84.pdf
Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition: A Textbook for Cognitive, Educational, Life Span and Applied Psychology. SAGE Publications.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Fomin, A. Y. (2012). Evrystika dostupnosti i metakohnitivnyi monitorynh resheniia uchebnykh zadach studentami [Heuristics of availability and metacognitive monitoring of solving learning tasks by students]. Psykhologiia: Vestnik Brianskogo hosuniveriteta, 1, 175-180. [in Russian]. Retrieved from http://vestnik-brgu.ru/wp-content/numbers/v2012_12.pdf
Hrynkiv, A. (2016). Metacognitive Researches in Context of Educational Innovations. Higher Education of Ukraine, 2, 37–43. Retrieved from http://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/19188/1/Grinkiv.pdf
Karpov, A. (2012). Interconnection of Learning and Metacognitive Characteristics of Personality. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2(3) (Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences), 228–235. Retrieved from http://vestnik.yspu.org/releases/2012_3pp/51.pdf
Kholodnaya, M. (2002). Psychology of Intellect: Paradoxes of Research. Saint Petersburg: Piter.
Kitsantas, A., & Dabbagh, N. (2013). Learning to Learn with Integrative Learning Technologies (ILT): A Practical Guide for Academic Success (Chinese Edition). IAP.
Kitsantas, A. & Dabbagh, N. (2010). Learning to learn with Integrative Learning Technologies (ILT); A Practical Guide for Academic Success. Charlotte: NC: Information Age Publishing.
Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2005). Illusions of competence in monitoring one’s knowledge during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(2), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7322.214.171.124
Leontyev, D., & Averyna, Z. (2011). Phenomenon of Reflexivity in Context of Issue of Self-Regulation [E-Resourse]. Psychological Research: Electronic Scientific Journal, 2(16). Retrieved from http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2011n2-16/463-leontiev-averina16.html
Maksymenko, S. (2017). Genetic Psychology of Human Learning [E-Resource]. Kyiv: Slovo. Retrieved from http://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/709727.
Nelson, T.O. & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and some new findings. In G.H. Bower (Ed). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, (Vol. 26, pp. 125–173). New York: Academic Press.
Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom. The Journal of Experimental Educational, 74(1), 7–28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20157410
Pasichnyk, I., Kalamazh, R., & Avhustiuk, M. (2014). Metakohnityvnyi monitorynh yak rehuliatyvnyi aspect metapiznannia [Metacognitive experience as regulative aspect of metaknowledge]. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu «Ostrozka akademiia»–Scientific Notes of the National University of Ostroh Academy. Series «Psychology and Pedagogy». Thematic Issue «Actual Problems of Cognitive Psychology, 28, 3-16. Retrieved from https://psj.oa.edu.ua/articles/2014/n28-ua/Pasisnik.pdf
Pasichnyk, I. & Dovhaliuk, T. (2016). Feedback as a Factor of Optimization of Metamemory under the Conditions of Proactive Interference. Scientific Notes of National University of Ostroh Academy. Series “Psychology”, 4, 5-18. Retrieved from https://eprints.oa.edu.ua/7503/1/3.pdf
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.
Savchenko, O. (2016). Reflexive Competence of Personality: monograph. Kherson: Helvetyka.
Savin, E. & Fomin, A. (2011). Confidence in Knowledge as Aspect of Metacognitive Monitoring in Learning Activity. Scientific Works of K. Tsyolkovskiy Kaluga State University. Series “Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences”, 244–248. Retrieved from http://evgenysavin.ru/_ld/0/61___-2011-______.pdf
Schunk, D. (1987). Self-Efficacy and School Learning. Psychology in Schools, 22(2), 208-223. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(198504)22:2<208::AID-PITS2310220215>3.0.CO;2-7
Tytarenko, T. (2013). Individuality-Oriented Approach in Practical Psychology. Psychology and Personality, 1(3), 85-96. Access Mode: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Psios_2013_1_9
Valdez, A. (2013). Student Metacognitive Monitoring: Predicting Test Achievement from Judgment Accuracy. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(2), 141-146. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v2n2p141
Winne, P. H. (2010). Bootstrapping learner’s self-regulated learning. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52(4), 472.
Zabrucky, K. M. (2010). Knowing what we know and do not know: Educational and real world implications. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1266-1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.185
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Eduard Balashov, Ihor Pasichnyk, Ruslana Kalamazh, Tetiana Zdrobylko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.