Reflexive Competence in Metacognitive Monitoring of Learning Activity of HEI Students

Authors

  • Eduard Balashov Department of Psychology and Pedagogy, National University of Ostroh Academy, Ostroh, Rivne Region, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6486-0494
  • Ihor Pasichnyk Department of Psychology and Pedagogy, National University of Ostroh Academy, Ostroh, Rivne Region, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7785-2584
  • Ruslana Kalamazh Department of Psychology and Pedagogy, National University of Ostroh Academy, Ostroh, Rivne Region, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2051-0732
  • Tetiana Zdrobylko Department of Psychology and Pedagogy, National University of Ostroh Academy, Ostroh, Rivne Region, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2020-8-SI-17-28

Keywords:

reflexivity, reflexive competence, self-regulation, metacognitive monitoring, learning activity

Abstract

The manuscript presented here reports the theoretical aspects of the concepts of reflexive competence and reflexivity, which is considered, in learning activities through a prism of metacognitive monitoring of HEI students. An essence of metacognitive monitoring and reflexive competence has been theoretically studied. The role of reflexive competence and its components in the process of metacognitive monitoring of the educational activities of students of HEIs has been described. Reflexive competence at the metacognitive level is viewed as a system of formed reflexive abilities, which ensures high productivity of the intellectual activity of the subject by activating the metacognitive resources that are necessary and organizing reflexive actions. The results of empirical research with the use of questionnaire “Reflexive skills (cognitive and metacognitive level scales) (O. Savchenko), Methodology “Reflexive strategies of task solution” (O. Savchenko and M. Makiienko), Metacogntive Awareness Inventory - MAI (G. Scraw and R. Dennison) and “Methodology of Self-Evaluation of Metacognitive Knowledge and Metacognitive Activeness” (M. Kashapov & Y. Skvortsova), and correlation analysis with the use of ANOVA analysis of variance and Spearmen’s rank correlation coefficient, have proved that student’s overconfidence can cause mistakes in the evaluation of the results of the work. Senior students have better indicators of reflexive skills at the metacognitive level and more sophisticated reflexive problem-solving strategies. Thus, the results indicate that senior students have a higher level of reflexive skills at the metacognitive and cognitive levels and a higher level of reflexive problem-solving strategies than the first- and second-year students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andrade, H. L., & Heritage, M. (2017). Using formative assessment to enhance learning, achievement, and academic self-regulation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623856

Avhustiuk, M. (2016). Psychological Peculiarities of Objectivity of Metacognitive Monitoring. Actual Issues of Development of Education and Science under Conditions of Globalization. Materials of All-Ukrainian Scientific Conference. Dnipro: Royal Print, 35–37. Retrieved from http://www.dnu.dp.ua/docs/zbirniki/fsnm/program_5a1d359d68327.pdf

Babaian, Y. (2014). Structure of Reflexive Competence of Teacher of Higher School. Scientific Bulletin of O. Sukhomlynskyi Mykolaiv National University. Series “Psychological Sciences”, 2(13), 22–26.

Balashov, E. (2019). Psychological characteristics of metacognitive monitoring in student learning activities. Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series “Psychological Sciences”, 4, 64–71. https://doi.org/10.32999/ksu2312-3206/2019-4-8

Balashov, E., Pasichnyk, I., & Kalamazh, R. (2018). Self-Monitoring and Self-Regulation of University Students in Text Comprehension. Psycholinguistics, 24(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2018-24-1-47-62

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.

Bembenutty, H., Kitsantas, A., & Cleary, T. J. (Eds.). (2013). Applications of selfregulated learning across diverse disciplines: A tribute to Barry J. Zimmerman. IAP.

Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2013). The role of social media in self-regulated learning. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 9(2), 256-273. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWBC.2013.053248

Dotsevych, T. I. (2014). Rozroblennia i aprobatsiia opytuvalnyka pedahohichnoi refleksyvnosti vykladacha vyshchoi shkoly [Designing and approbation of questionnaire of reflexivity of a HEI teacher]. Psykholohichni perspektyvy–Psychological Perspectives, 23, 99-112.

Dovhaliuk, T. & Voloshyna, V. (2015). Poniattia myslennia yak metakohnityvnoho protsesu u psykholohichnii nautsi [Concept of Thinking as Metacognitive Process in Psychological Science]. Molodyi vchenyi–Young Scientist, 10(25), 184-188. Retrieved from http://molodyvcheny.in.ua/files/journal/2015/10/84.pdf

Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition: A Textbook for Cognitive, Educational, Life Span and Applied Psychology. SAGE Publications.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

Fomin, A. Y. (2012). Evrystika dostupnosti i metakohnitivnyi monitorynh resheniia uchebnykh zadach studentami [Heuristics of availability and metacognitive monitoring of solving learning tasks by students]. Psykhologiia: Vestnik Brianskogo hosuniveriteta, 1, 175-180. [in Russian]. Retrieved from http://vestnik-brgu.ru/wp-content/numbers/v2012_12.pdf

Hrynkiv, A. (2016). Metacognitive Researches in Context of Educational Innovations. Higher Education of Ukraine, 2, 37–43. Retrieved from http://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/19188/1/Grinkiv.pdf

Karpov, A. (2012). Interconnection of Learning and Metacognitive Characteristics of Personality. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2(3) (Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences), 228–235. Retrieved from http://vestnik.yspu.org/releases/2012_3pp/51.pdf

Kholodnaya, M. (2002). Psychology of Intellect: Paradoxes of Research. Saint Petersburg: Piter.

Kitsantas, A., & Dabbagh, N. (2013). Learning to Learn with Integrative Learning Technologies (ILT): A Practical Guide for Academic Success (Chinese Edition). IAP.

Kitsantas, A. & Dabbagh, N. (2010). Learning to learn with Integrative Learning Technologies (ILT); A Practical Guide for Academic Success. Charlotte: NC: Information Age Publishing.

Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2005). Illusions of competence in monitoring one’s knowledge during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(2), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.187

Leontyev, D., & Averyna, Z. (2011). Phenomenon of Reflexivity in Context of Issue of Self-Regulation [E-Resourse]. Psychological Research: Electronic Scientific Journal, 2(16). Retrieved from http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2011n2-16/463-leontiev-averina16.html

Maksymenko, S. (2017). Genetic Psychology of Human Learning [E-Resource]. Kyiv: Slovo. Retrieved from http://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/709727.

Nelson, T.O. & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and some new findings. In G.H. Bower (Ed). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, (Vol. 26, pp. 125–173). New York: Academic Press.

Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom. The Journal of Experimental Educational, 74(1), 7–28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20157410

Pasichnyk, I., Kalamazh, R., & Avhustiuk, M. (2014). Metakohnityvnyi monitorynh yak rehuliatyvnyi aspect metapiznannia [Metacognitive experience as regulative aspect of metaknowledge]. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu «Ostrozka akademiia»–Scientific Notes of the National University of Ostroh Academy. Series «Psychology and Pedagogy». Thematic Issue «Actual Problems of Cognitive Psychology, 28, 3-16. Retrieved from https://psj.oa.edu.ua/articles/2014/n28-ua/Pasisnik.pdf

Pasichnyk, I. & Dovhaliuk, T. (2016). Feedback as a Factor of Optimization of Metamemory under the Conditions of Proactive Interference. Scientific Notes of National University of Ostroh Academy. Series “Psychology”, 4, 5-18. Retrieved from https://eprints.oa.edu.ua/7503/1/3.pdf

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.

Savchenko, O. (2016). Reflexive Competence of Personality: monograph. Kherson: Helvetyka.

Savin, E. & Fomin, A. (2011). Confidence in Knowledge as Aspect of Metacognitive Monitoring in Learning Activity. Scientific Works of K. Tsyolkovskiy Kaluga State University. Series “Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences”, 244–248. Retrieved from http://evgenysavin.ru/_ld/0/61___-2011-______.pdf

Schunk, D. (1987). Self-Efficacy and School Learning. Psychology in Schools, 22(2), 208-223. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(198504)22:2<208::AID-PITS2310220215>3.0.CO;2-7

Tytarenko, T. (2013). Individuality-Oriented Approach in Practical Psychology. Psychology and Personality, 1(3), 85-96. Access Mode: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Psios_2013_1_9

Valdez, A. (2013). Student Metacognitive Monitoring: Predicting Test Achievement from Judgment Accuracy. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(2), 141-146. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v2n2p141

Winne, P. H. (2010). Bootstrapping learner’s self-regulated learning. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52(4), 472.

Zabrucky, K. M. (2010). Knowing what we know and do not know: Educational and real world implications. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1266-1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.185

Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-21

How to Cite

Balashov, E., Pasichnyk, I., Kalamazh, R., & Zdrobylko, T. (2020). Reflexive Competence in Metacognitive Monitoring of Learning Activity of HEI Students. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 8(Special issue), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2020-8-SI-17-28