Development of Engineering Students Competencies Based on Cognitive Technologies in Conditions of Industry 4.0

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2020-8-SI-93-101

Keywords:

Industry 4.0, engineering education, cognitive abilities, metacognitive competencies, reflection, individual’s self-development

Abstract

Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0 concepts are actively developing all over the world. The accelerating transition to Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0 sets new requirements for the university education system in qualifications and competencies of engineering universities graduates. The article reveals the possibilities of using cognitive models in the professional training of research engineers for new industries. Authors used the modeling method for creating a cognitive and metacognitive model of the process. It can be used for the development of forming the optimal structure of higher professional engineering education. The article substantiates that the main tasks of modernization of pedagogical approaches in modern education, is to establish the compliance of educational products with the labor market requirements and transform the structure of vocational education, providing training for professional specialists required by specific employers. Conclusions are drawn about the important role of soft skills for engineering education in Industry 4.0. The results obtained in the study can be used for the engineering category of students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bogavac, D., & Đukić, T. M. (2017). Non-formal education within the function of responsible parenting. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 5(1), 31. https://doi:10.5937/IJCRSEE1701031B

Cosgrove, T., & O’Reilly, J. (2020). Theory, practice and interiority: an extended epistemology for engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(1), 38-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1544226

Dinsmore, P. C., & PMP, D. (2014). Team Building and Interpersonal Skills for Dynamic Times. The AMA Handbook of Project Management. Retrieved from http://dl.booktolearn.com/ebooks2/management/9780814433393_the_ama_handbook_of_project_management_8c7c.pdf#page=424

Kiel, D., Müller, J. M., Arnold, C., & Voigt, K. I. (2017). Sustainable industrial value creation: Benefits and challenges of industry 4.0. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(08), 1740015. https:doi.org/10.1142/S1363919617400151

Kochetkov, D. M., Larionova, V. A., & Vukovic, D. B. (2017). Entrepreneurial capacity of universities and its impact on regional economic growth. Economy of Region/Ekonomika Regiona, (2). 477-488. https:doi.org/10.17059/2017-2-13

Laguador, J. M., & Dotong, C. I. (2014). Knowledge versus practice on the outcomes-based education implementation of the engineering faculty members in LPU. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 3(1), 63-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v3-i1/640

Matsuo, M., & Tsukube, T. (2020). A review on cognitive apprenticeship in educational research: Application for management education. The International Journal of Management Education, 18(3), 100417. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1472811720301841

Mingaleva, Z. (2018). Peculiarities of the formation of communication competences within the framework of project training in a polytechnic university. Rhetoric and Communications E-journal, 36, Retrieved from http://journal.rhetoric.bg/?p=2141

Onday, O. (2019). Japan’s society 5.0: Going beyond Industry 4.0. Business and Economics Journal, 10(2), 1-6. https://10.4172/2151-6219.1000389

Othman, N. T. A., Misnon, R., Abdullah, S. R. S., Kofli, N. T., Kamarudin, S. K., & Mohamad, A. B. (2011). Assessment of programme outcomes through exit survey of Chemical/Biochemical Engineering students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 39-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.007

Oztemel, E., & Gursev, S. (2020). Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 31(1), 127-182. https://10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8

Patil, A., & Codner, G. (2007). Accreditation of engineering education: review, observations and proposal for global accreditation. European journal of engineering education, 32(6), 639-651. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03043790701520594

Peng, P., & Kievit, R. A. (2020). The development of academic achievement and cognitive abilities: A bidirectional perspective. Child Development Perspectives, 14(1), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12352

Potočan, V., Mulej, M., & Nedelko, Z. (2020). Society 5.0: balancing of Industry 4.0, economic advancement and social problems. Kybernetes. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/K-12-2019-0858/full/html

Rajaee, N., Junaidi, E., Taib, S. N. L., Salleh, S. F., & Munot, M. A. (2013). Issues and challenges in implementing outcome based education in engineering education. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 1(4), 1-9. http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/1168

Rampasso, I. S., Quelhas, O. L., Anholon, R., Pereira, M. B., Miranda, J. D., & Alvarenga, W. S. (2020). Engineering Education for Sustainable Development: Evaluation Criteria for Brazilian Context. Sustainability, 12(10), 3947. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12103947

Robinson, M. A., Sparrow, P. R., Clegg, C., & Birdi, K. (2005). Design engineering competencies: future requirements and predicted changes in the forthcoming decade. Design Studies, 26(2), 123-153. http://dx.doi:10.1016/j.destud.2004.09.004

Schwab, K., & Davis, N. (2018). Shaping the future of the fourth industrial revolution. Currency. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/doi/book/10.5555/3312394

Sheketa, V., Bestylny, M., & Khrabatyn, R. (2006, February). Applicable scaling of user predicate queries in given categorical strategy and restrictions system. In 2006 International Conference-Modern Problems of Radio Engineering, Telecommunications, and Computer Science (pp. 34-37). IEEE. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4404436

Siarova, H., Sternadel, D., & Mašidlauskaitė, R. (2017). Assessment practices for 21st century learning: review of evidence. NESET II report. https://doi.org/10.2766/71491

Subheesh, N. P., & Sethy, S. S. (2020). Learning through assessment and feedback practices: A critical review of engineering education settings. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(3), em1829. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/114157

Tsvetkov V.Ya.(2016). Cognitive model stratification. International Journal of Applied and Basic Research. 2(1). 136. http://www.applied-research.ru/pdf/2016/2-1/8456.pdf

Vlasov, A. I., Juravleva, L. V., & Shakhnov, V. A. (2019). Visual environment of cognitive graphics for end-to-end engineering project-based education. Journal of Applied Engineering Science, 17(1), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.5937/jaes17-20262

Vuković, D. B., Shpak, N. A., Radovanović, M. M., Portugal Duarte, A., & Radulović, D. (2015). The role of human resources on the economy: a study of the balkan eu member states. Journal of the Geographical Institute’Jovan Cvijic’SASA, 65(2). https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI1502123V

Yakymchuk, B. A., Chystiak, O. V., Padalka, R. G., Moskalyk, H. F., & Denha, N. M. (2020). Fostering Cognitive and Creative Thinking Styles Using Educational Tools Aimed at the “Creative Economy” Model in the Process of Vocational Education and Training. Psychology and education, 57(1), 01-07. Retrieved from http://www.psychologyandeducation.net/Article/fostering-cognitive-and-creative-thinking-styles-using-educational-tools-aimed-at-the-creative-economy-model-in-the-process-of-vocational-education-and-training.pdf

Downloads

Published

2020-12-21

How to Cite

Mingaleva, Z., & Vukovic, N. (2020). Development of Engineering Students Competencies Based on Cognitive Technologies in Conditions of Industry 4.0 . International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 8(Special issue), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2020-8-SI-93-101

Metrics

Plaudit

Received 2020-10-30
Accepted 2020-11-25
Published 2020-12-21