Methodology of Comparative Research in Education: Role and Significance

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2020-8-3-155-162

Keywords:

epistemology of comparative research, comparative pedagogy, quantitative methodological approach, qualitative methodological approach, education systems

Abstract

Research interest in the comparison of education systems emerged parallel with the study of social development and the general globalization of social resources. The contemporary context of research discourse puts researchers in a position of necessary collaboration and partnership, with a special emphasis on the comparative analysis of educational phenomena. The aim of this study is the analysis of the theoretical understandings of the role of comparative research in the cognition of pedagogical phenomena as well as the transformation of the comparative methodological apparatus in the contemporary context. The research tasks are aimed at analyzing the historical development of comparative research, epistemology, the function of comparative research in pedagogy, as well as its importance in pedagogy. The importance of developing pluralism in the methodological approach of comparative research is emphasized in order to strengthen research capacities for its future development in pedagogical sciences. The study relies on the historical method and the method of source content analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexander, R. (2009). Towards a comparative pedagogy. In R. Cowen, & A.M. Kazamias (Eds.), International handbook of comparative education (pp. 923-939). Dordrecht: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2F978-1-4020-6403-6_59

Bray, M. (2002). Comparative education in the era of globalisation: Evolution, missions and roles. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, 8, 115-135. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2JwbQT7

Bray, M., Adamson, B., & Mason, M. (2007). Comparative education research: Approaches and methods. Comparative Education Research Centre. The University of Hong Kong. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/978-1-4020-6189-9

Chigisheva, O. (2015). Globalization and its influence on comparative education methodology. Bulgarian Comparative Education Society, 13(2), 131-137. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED568931.pdf

Crossley, M. (2000). Bridging Cultures and Traditions in the Reconceptualisation of Comparative and International Education. Comparative Education, 36(3), 319-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/713656615

Dyankova, G. (2018). Research of cognitive exchange specifics in teachers academic training. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 6(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1803001D

Epstein, E.H. (1983). Currents left and right: ideology in comparative education. Comparative Education Review, 27(1), 3-29. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3mkDDUZ

Epstein, E.H. (2008). Setting the normative boundaries: Crucial epistemological benchmarks in comparative education. Comparative Education 44(4), 373-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060802481405

Epstein, E.H. (2017). Is Marc-Antoine Jullien de Paris the “father” of comparative education? Compare, 47(3), 317-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2016.1254542

Green, A. (2003). Education, globalisation and the role of comparative research. London Review of Education, 1(2), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/1474846032000098464

Halls, W.D. (1990). Comparative education: contemporary issues and trends. London: J. Kingsley Publishers.

Holmes, B. (1984). Paradigm shifts in comparative education. Comparative Education Review, 28(4), 584-604. https://doi.org/10.1086/446469

Kaloyannaki, P., & Kazamias, A. M. (2009). The modernist beginnings of comparative education. The proto-scientific and the reformist-meliorist administrative motif. In R. Cowen, & A.M. Kazamias (Eds.), International Handbook of Comparative Education (pp. 11-30). Dordrecht: Springer.

Kazamias, A.M. (1961). Some old and new approaches to methodology in education. Comparative Education Review, 5, 90-96. https://doi.org/10.1086/444876

Kazamias, A.M. (2001). Re-Inventing the historical in comparative education: Reflections on a protean episteme by a contemporary player. Comparative Education, 37(4), 439-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060120091247

Manzon, M. (2018). Origins and traditions in comparative education: Challenging some assumptions. Comparative education, 54(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2017.1416820

Marginson, S., & Mollis, M. (2001). The door opens and the tiger leaps: Theories and reflexivities of comparative education for a global millennium. Comparative Education Review, 45(4), 581-615. https://doi.org/10.1086/447693

Mattheou, D. (2009). The scientific paradigm in comparative education. In R. Cowen, & A.M. Kazamias (Eds.), International Handbook of Comparative Education (pp. 11-30). Dordrecht: Springer.

Noah, H. J., & Eckstein, M. A. (1969). Toward a Science of Comparative Education. London: Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131727009340421

Noah, H.J (1984). The use and abuse of comparative education. Comparative Education Review, 28(4), 550-562. https://doi.org/10.1086/446467

Otsuka, Y. (2009). The challenges of fieldwork in comparative education studies in Japan: A methodological consideration. Educational Studies in Japan: International Yearbook, 4, 37-51. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ912718.pdf

Phillips, D. (1999). On comparing. In R. Alexander, P. Broadfoot & D. Phillips (Eds.), Learning from comparing: New directions in comparative educational research, context, classrooms and outcomes (pp. 15-20). Oxford: Symposium books.

Phillips, D. (2006). Comparative education: Method. Research in Comparative and International Education, 1(4), 304-319. https://doi.org/10.2304%2Frcie.2006.1.4.304

Ruscoe, G. C., & Nelson, T.W. (1964). Prolegomena to a definition of comparative education. International Review of Education, 10(4), 385-392. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01416166

Rust, V.D., Soumaré, A., Pescador, O., & Shibuya, M. (1999). Research strategies in comparative education. Comparative Education Review, 43(1), 86-109. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2KUMTBr

Schneider, F., Kirkpatrick, U., Fellner, L., & Bereday, G. (1961). The immanent evolution of education: a neglected aspect of comparative education. Comparative Education Review, 4(3), 136-139. https://doi.org/10.1086/444845

Silova, I., & Brehm, W.C. (2010). For the love of knowledge: William W. Brickman and his comparative education. European Education, 42(2), 17-36. https://doi.org/10.2753/EUE1056-4934420202

Spasenović, V. (2013). Školski sistemi iz komparativne perspektive [School systems from a comparative perspective]. Belgrade: Institute of Pedagogy and Andragogy, Faculty of Philosophy.

Stanković, Z., Maksimović, J., & Osmanović, J. (2018). Cognitive theories and paradigmatic research posts in the function of multimedia teaching and learning. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 6(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1802107S

Tamtik, M. (2014). Book review. Canadian and International Education, 43(2), 1-6. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3muEna8

Vulliamy, G. (2004). The impact of globalization on qualitative research in comparative and international education. Compare, 34(3), 261-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305792042000257112

Wilson, D. (2003). The future of comparative and international education in a globalised world. International Review of Education, 49(1-2), 15-33. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2JdIwRB

Zha, Q., & Tu, D. (2016). Doing mixed methods research in comparative education: Some reflections on the fit and a survey of the literature. In A. W. Wiseman & E. Anderson (Eds.), Annual Review of Comparative and International Education 2015 (pp. 165-191). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-367920150000028014

Downloads

Published

2020-12-20

How to Cite

Milošević, D. ., & Maksimović, J. (2020). Methodology of Comparative Research in Education: Role and Significance. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 8(3), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2020-8-3-155-162