Functions of Participants in the Collaborative Solution of Thinking Problems




collaborative thinking, function, role, functional foundations, self-organization, regulation, thinking style, thinking, thinking tasks


The article presents the results of an empirical study of the collaborative solution of thinking problems by groups of students. The study was conducted in the context of educational activities when students solve educational problems. The student group was divided into subgroups of four people; each subgroup was given a learning task. In accordance with the author’s ideas, collaborative thinking is carried out through the implementation of the following functions: generation, selection, meaning transfer, implementation. These functions are distributed among participants in collaborative problem solving. The purpose of the study was to study the distribution of functions when students collaboratively solve thinking problems. To study the distribution of functions, the author used a questionnaire to determine the distribution of functions between students. The author has shown that in the process of collaborative problem solving, functions are distributed among the participants. It is revealed that in the processes of collaborative solution of thinking tasks, each group of students has a unique combination of functions, which the author defines as the group’s thinking style.


Download data is not yet available.


Ahonen, A., & Harding, S. M. (2018). Assessing online collaborative problem solving among school children in finland: a case study using ATC21S TM in a National Context. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17(2), 138-158.

Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis; a method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, Mass: Addison-Wesley. Retrieved from

Belbin, R. M. (1993). Team Roles at Work (London: Butterworth-Heinemann). Retrieved from

Belousova A. K. (2002). Самоорганизация совместной мыслительной деятельности [Collaborative Thinking Activity Self-Organization]. Ростов-на-Дону: РГПУ. Retrieved from

Belousova A. K. (2010). Initiation of Collaborative Thinking Activity Self-Organization: Basic conceptions and experimental research of collaborative thinking activity generation. Saarbrücken: LAP LAMBERT. Retrieved from

Belousova A. K. (2013). Editorial. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 2(1), Retrieved from

Burch, G. F., Burch, J. J., & Batchelor, J. H. (2019). Group Creative Problem Solving: The Role of Creative Personality, Process and Creative Ability. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 23(3), 38-54.

Calvo, P., & Gomila, T. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of cognitive science: An embodied approach. Elsevier.

Care, E., Scoular, C., & Griffin, P. (2016). Assessment of collaborative problem solving in education environments. Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 250-264.

Chen, L., Yoshimatsu, N., Goda, Y., Okubo, F., Taniguchi, Y., Oi, M., ... & Yamada, M. (2019). Direction of collaborative problem solving-based STEM learning by learning analytics approach. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), 1-28.

Craig G. J., & Baucum, D. (2001). Human Development. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Retrieved from

Dautov, D. F. (2009). Influence of creative abilities on group’s functional and role structure. Russian psychological journal, 6(1), 84-86.

Gellert M, & Nowak C. (2000). A practical book for working in and with teams. Limmer Verlag, Retrieved from

Gadzhiev, CH. M. (1983). Организация коллективного изобретательства. В книге: Исследование проблем психологии творчества [Organization of collective invention. In the book: Research into the problems of the psychology of creativity]. Москва: Наука, 1983. С.266-279. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 266-279.

Griffin P. (2017) Assessing and Teaching 21st Century Skills: Collaborative Problem Solving as a Case Study. In: von Davier A., Zhu M., Kyllonen P. (eds) Innovative Assessment of Collaboration. Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment. Springer, Cham.

Griffin P., Care E., & Harding SM. (2015) Task Characteristics and Calibration. In: Griffin P., Care E. (eds) Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Educational Assessment in an Information Age. Springer, Dordrecht.

Griffin, P., & Care, E. (Eds.). (2014). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach. Springer.

Griffin, P., Care, E., & McGaw, B. (2012). The changing role of education and schools. In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 1-15). Springer, Dordrecht.

Harding, S. M. E., Griffin, P. E., Awwal, N., Alom, B. M., & Scoular, C. (2017). Measuring collaborative problem solving using mathematics-based tasks. AERA Open, 3(3), 1–19. 2332858417728046.

Harding, S. M., & Griffin, P. E. (2016). Rasch Measurement of Collaborative Problem Solving in an Online Environment. Journal of Applied Measurement, 17(1), 35-53. Retrieved from

Hesse F., Care E., Buder J., Sassenberg K., Griffin P. (2015) A Framework for Teachable Collaborative Problem Solving Skills. In: Griffin P., Care E. (eds) Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Educational Assessment in an Information Age. Springer, Dordrecht.

Lioe, L. T., Fai, H. K., & Hedberg, J. G. (2006). Students’ Metacognitive Problem-Solving Strategies in Solving Openended Problems in Pairs. In Redesigning Pedagogy (pp. 243-259). Brill Sense.

Lipponen, L. (2002, January). Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning. In CSCL (Vol. 2, pp. 72-81).

Pavlova, T. V. (2015). Распределение функций в совместной мыслительной деятельности дошкольников с разным типом личности [Distribution of functions in the joint mental activity of preschoolers with different personality types]. Вестник Саратовского областного института развития образования, 4(4), 26-35. Retrieved from

Rudestam, K. E. (1982). Experiential groups in theory and practice. Brooks/Cole Pub Co.

Schindler, R. (1968). Dynamische Prozesse in der Gruppenpsychotherapie [Dynamic processes in group psychotherapy]. Z Gruppenpsychother Gruppendyn, 1, 31-37.

Szary, J., & Dale, R. (2013). Dyadic cooperation enhances retrieval and recall of crossword solutions. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 35(35). Retrieved from

Tikhomirov, O. K. (2008). Психология мышления [The psychology of thinking]. Moscow: Academy. Retrieved from

Uznadze D. N. (2001). Психология установки [The Psychology of Set]. Санкт-Петербург: Питер. Retrieved from

Vygotsky L. S. (1983). Проблемы развития психики [Problems of the development of the psyche]. V.3. [In Collected works: In the 6 volumes]. Moscow: Pedagogy, Retrieved from,2;fs,1/

Vygotsky L. S. (1986). Конкретная психология человека. Вестн. Моск. ун-та. Сер, 14, 52-65. Retrieved from

Vygotsky L. S. (2005). Психология развития человека [Human developmental psychology]. — Moscow: Smysl; Eksmo. Retrieved from

Yaroshevsky M. G., Yurevich A. V., & Allakhverdyan A. G. (2000). Программно-ролевой подход и современная наука [Role-based approach and modern science. Psychology issues]. Вопросы психологии, (6), 3-18. Retrieved from

Yuan, J., Xiao, Y., & Liu, H. (2019). Assessment of Collaborative Problem Solving Based on Process Stream Data: A New Paradigm for Extracting Indicators and Modeling Dyad Data. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 369.




How to Cite

Belousova, A. (2020). Functions of Participants in the Collaborative Solution of Thinking Problems. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 8(Special issue), 29–36.



Received 2020-12-09
Accepted 2020-12-11
Published 2020-12-21

Most read articles by the same author(s)