The Ideal L2 Self as a Factor of Self-Motivation in Willingness to Communicate

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2021-9-2-189-202

Keywords:

Ideal L2 self, self-motivation, willingness to communicate in L2 language

Abstract

Theoretical basis of this paper is the heuristic L2 Motivational Self System (L2MSS). The research aims to determine the degree to which the ideal L2 self can be regarded as a significant factor with regards to its power to make a difference in students’ actual motivated behaviour in L2 communication. The research sample consists of 396 students. The ideal L2 self is a predictor variable. Willingness to communicate and the obtained grades are criterion variables. Gender, period of time spent learning English / German, and whether students are residing in the country where the target language is spoken are all moderator variables. Systematic non-experimental observation method based on Dörnyei and Taguchi´s survey was used in this study. Cronbach’s alpha indicated high reliability in the presented sample (.92). Willingness to communicate was investigated using McCroskey´s questionnaire. The findings indicate a rather complex picture of the observed L2 MSS constructs and the importance of their components in the field of L2 learning. Therefore, for further research, it is suggested that the ideal L2 self should be divided into two constructs: obligations that the individual would like to comply with and obligations that others expect him/her to comply with. The contribution of the L2 learning experience should also be considered because otherwise, it is difficult to determine the progress of the model design and what to do with it in practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2018). The L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(4), 721-754. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.4.2

Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2003). The role of gender and immersion in communication and second language orientations. Language learning, 53(S1), 65-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00224

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology,52(1), 1-26.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

Boo, Z., Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). L2 motivation research 2005–2014: Understanding a publication surge and a changing landscape. System, 55, 145-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.10.006

Donovan, L. A., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2004). Age and sex differences in willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, and self-perceived competence. Communication Research Reports, 21(4), 420-427. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090409360006

Dörnyei, Z. (2006). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. TESLEJ, 10(1). Retrieved from http://www.cc.kyoto-su.ac.jp/information/tesl-ej/ej37/r7.html

Dörnyei, Z. (2009a). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei& E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691293-003

Dörnyei, Z. (2009b). Motivation, language identities and the L2 Self: Future research directions. In: Z. Dörnyei& E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 350-356). Multilingual Matters.https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691293-019

Dörnyei, Z. (2014). Motivation in second language learning: In M. Celce-Murcia, DM Brinton & MA Snow (eds.). Teaching English as a second or foreign language: 518–531. Boston. National Geographic Learning/Cengage Learning.

Dörnyei, Z., & Chan, L. (2013). Motivation and vision: An analysis of future L2 self images, sensory styles, and imagery capacity across two target languages. Language Learning, 63(3), 437-462. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12005

Dornyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The Psychology of the Language Learner Revisited (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315779553

Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2009).Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864739

Dörnyei, Z., &Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Harlow, UK: Longman.

Evtyugina, A., Zhuminova, A., Grishina, E., Kondyurina, I., & Sturikova, M. (2020). Cognitive-Conceptual Model for Developing Foreign Language Communicative Competence in Non-Linguistic University Students. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 8(Special issue), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2020-8-SI-69-77

Gardner, G., Gardner, A., Middleton, S., Della, P., Kain, V., & Doubrovsky, A. (2010). The work of nurse practitioners. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(10), 2160-2169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05379.x

Ghanizadeh, A., Eishabadi, N., & Rostami, S. (2016). Motivational dimension of willingness to communicate in L2: The impacts of criterion measure, ideal L2 self, family influence, and attitudes to L2 culture. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 5(3), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2015.1261

Ghanizadeh, A., & Rostami, S. (2015). A Dörnyei-inspired study on second language motivation: A cross-comparison analysis in public and private contexts. Psychological Studies, 60(3), 292-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-015-0328-4

Gojkov-Rajić, A., Stojanović, A., Šafranj,J. & Gojkov,G. (2021a). Didaktički aspekti samoregulacije učenja darovitih, [Didactic aspects of self-regulation of gifted learning], Monograph, Srpska akademija obrazovanja, Beograd, p.260.

Gojkov-Rajić, A., Šafranj, J.& Gojkov,G. (2021b). Relationship between didactic instructions and metacognition in foreign language learning. In: Herzog, J. (Ed.) Giftedness in a Variety of Educational Fields (57-79). Verlag Dr.Kovač GmbH, Hamburg.

Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium, Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408-420, https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360

Henry, A., Davydenko, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2015). The anatomy of directed motivational currents: Exploring intense and enduring periods of L2 motivation. The Modern Language Journal, 99(2), 329-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12214

Higgins, E.T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319

Islam, M., Lamb, M., & Chambers, G. (2013). The L2 motivational self system and national interest: A Pakistani perspective. System, 41, 231-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.01.025

Kanat-Mutluoğlu, A. (2016). The influence of ideal L2 self, academic self-concept and intercultural communicative competence on willingness to communicate in a foreign language. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.461012

Kim, S. J. (2004).Exploring willingness to communicate (WTC) in English among Korean EFL (English as a foreign language) students in Korea: WTC as a predictor of success in second language acquisition. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation).The Ohio State University. Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_etd/send_file/send?accession=osu1101267838&disposition=inline

Kim, Y. K., & Kim, T. Y. (2011). The effect of Korean secondary school students’ perceptual learning styles and ideal L2 self on motivated L2 behavior and English proficiency. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics,11(1), 21-42.

Kleitman, S., & Stankov, L. (2007). Self-confidence and metacognitive processes. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(2), 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.004

Lamb, M. (2012). A self system perspective on young adolescents’ motivation to learn English in urban and rural settings. Language Learning, 62(4), 997-1023. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00719.x

MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x

MacIntyre, P. D., & Doucette, J. (2010). Willingness to communicate and action control. System, 38(2), 161-171.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.12.013

MacIntyre, P.D. & A. Serroul, (2015). Motivation on a Per-Second Timescale: Examining Approach-Avoidance Motivation During L2 Task Performance. In Z. Dörnyei, P.D. MacIntyre& A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational Dynamics in Language Learning (pp. 109-138), Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092574-013

Marks, M., Fairris, D., & Beleche, T. (2012). Do course evaluations truly reflect student learning. Economics of Education Review, 31(5), 709-719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.05.001

Markus, H. R., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954

Martinović, A. (2018). The L2 motivational self system: Differences among learners, Jezikoslovlje,19(1), 133-157, University of Zadar, Zadar.

McCroskey, J. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly,40(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379209369817

Mehmet, S. A. K. (2020). The role of ideal L2 self in predicting L2 willingness to communicate inside and outside the classroom. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 189-203. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.775798

Moskovsky, C., Assulaimani, T., Racheva, S., & Harkins, J. (2016). The L2 motivational self system and L2 achievement: A study of Saudi EFL learners. The Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 641-654. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12340

Munezane, Y. (2013). Attitudes, affect and ideal L2 self as predictors of willingness to communicate. Eurosla Yearbook, 13(1), 176-198. https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.13.09mun

Munezane, Y. (2015). Enhancing willingness to communicate: Relative effects of visualization and goal setting. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12193

Noels, K. A. (2009). The Internalisation of Language Learning into the Self and Social Identity. In Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 295-313). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691293-016

Öz, H. (2016). Role of the ideal L2 self in predicting willingness to communicate of EFL students. In İ. H. Mirici, İ. H. Erten, H. Öz, & I. Vodopija-Krstanovic (Eds.), Research papers as an Additional Language (pp. 163-182). Rijeka: Faculty of Humanities and Social Research.

Papi, M. & Abdollahzadeh, E. (2012). Teacher Motivational Practice, Student Motivation, and Possible L2 Selves: An Examination in the Iranian EFL Context. Language Learning, 62(2), 571-594. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00632.x

Papi, M., & Teimouri, Y. (2012). Dynamics of selves and motivation: a cross-sectional study in the EFL context of Iran. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(3), 287-309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2012.00312.x

Peng, J. E. (2007). Willingness to communicate in an L2 and integrative motivation among college students in an intensive English language program in China. University of Sydney papers in TESOL, 2(1), 33-59. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.561.3662&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Peng, J. E. (2012). Towards an ecological understanding of willingness to communicate in EFL classrooms in China. System, 40(2), 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.02.002

Peng, J. E. (2015). L2 motivational self system, attitudes, and affect as predictors of L2 WTC: An imagined community perspective. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(2), 433-443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0195-0

Peng, J. E., & Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language learning, 60(4), 834–876.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00576.x

Prtljaga, J. (2021).Učenje i poučavanje engleskog jezika na ranom uzrastu [Learning and teaching English at an early age], Vršac, VŠSS, “M. Palov”.

Shirvan, M. E., Khajavy, G. H., MacIntyre, P. D., &Taherian, T. (2019). A meta-analysis of L2 willingness to communicate and its three high-evidence correlates. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 48(6), 1241-1267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09656-9

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics, 6th Edition, California State University of Northridge.

Teimouri, Y. (2017). L2 selves, emotions, and motivated behaviors. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(4), 681-709. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000243

Ushioda, E. (2011). Language learning motivation, self and identity: Current theoretical perspectives, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(3), 199-210.https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.538701

Williams, M., Mercer, S., & Ryan, S. (2016). Exploring psychology in language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.

Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00136

Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L., & Shimizu, K. (2004). The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning, 54(1), 119-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00250.x

Yu, M. (2008). Willingness to communicate of foreign language learners in a Chinese setting. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Florida State University, Tallahassee.

You, C., Dörnyei, Z., & Csizér, K. (2016). Motivation, vision, and gender: A survey of learners of English in China. Language Learning, 66(1), 94-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12140

Zarrinabadi, N. (2014). Communicating in a second language: Investigating the effect of teacher on learners’ willingness to communicate. System, 42, 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.014

Published

2021-08-31

How to Cite

Šafranj, J., Gojkov Rajić, A., & Bogdanović, V. (2021). The Ideal L2 Self as a Factor of Self-Motivation in Willingness to Communicate. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 9(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2021-9-2-189-202