• Velina Slavova New Bulgarian University, Department of Computer Science, Bulgaria




language acquisition, corpus analysis, mental representation, concept formation, language faculty


This study explores statistically child language-acquisition using data extracted from large collections for acquisition in two languages – English and French. Comparison of the two collections reveals that the advancement in acquiring vocabulary displays very big differences when the children’s speech is classified by the parts of speech deployed, as these are formally defined in the two languages, despite there being no reasons to suppose that the two language groups of children should show significant differences in cognitive development. The hypothesis put forward is that there exist general classes of meaning-representation and the challenge is to obtain evidence corroborating this. A specific set of classes is proposed, derived according to their different contributing roles in the mental representation of the world, considered from the perspective of an “Actor in the environment” cognitive model. The identified parts of speech from the two languages are sorted into the proposed classes. It is shown statistically that when children’s speech is discriminated to these classes, the acquisition processes in the two languages are very alike. Examining the data, the use of these classes is evident from the onset of language production. Some particularities related to factors influencing the use of communicators, interjections and onomatopoeias in children’s speech are discussed in addition to the study’s overall findings.


Download data is not yet available.


Asano, M., Imai, M., Kita, S., Kitajo, K., Okada, H., & Thierry, G. (2015). Sound symbolism scaffolds language development in preverbal infants. cortex, 63, 196-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.08.025

Atanasov, D., Slavova, V., & Andonov, F. (2016, July). A Statistical Study of First Language Acquisition: No Gender Differences in the Use of Parts of Speech. In Proc. of the 12th Annual International Conference on Computer Science and Education in Computer Science (CSECS 2016) (pp. 1-4). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Velina_Slavova/publication/315729185_A_STATISTICAL_STUDY_OF_FIRST_LANGUAGE_ACQUISITION_NO_GENDER_DIFFERECES_IN_THE_USE_OF_PARTS_OF_SPEECH/links/58dfa453a6fdcc41bf920578/A-STATISTICAL-STUDY-OF-FIRST-LANGUAGE-ACQUISITION-NO-GENDER-DIFFERECES-IN-THE-USE-OF-PARTS-OF-SPEECH.pdf

Barsalou, L. (2003). Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and cognitive processes, 18(5-6), 513-562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000026

Bassano, D. (2000). Early development of nouns and verbs in French: Exploring the interface between lexicon and grammar. Journal of child language, 27(03), 521-559. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-child-language/article/early-development-of-nouns-and-verbs-in-french-exploring-the-interface-between-lexicon-and-grammar/854B3A644E6542A31487A7B2343828ED

Bergelson, E., & Swingley, D. (2012). At 6–9 months, human infants know the meanings of many common nouns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9), 3253-3258. doi:10.1073/pnas.1113380109 http://www.pnas.org/content/109/9/3253.full

CHILDES - the child language component of the Talk Bank system for sharing and studying conversational interactions. http://childes.talkbank.org/

De Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale, publié par Ch. Bally et A. Sechehaye avec la collaboration de A. Riedlinger. Paris: Payot. https://books.google.bg/books?hl=en&lr=&id=wmLQflL01Y4C&oi=fnd&pg=PA10&dq=De+Saussure,+F.+(1916).+Cours+de+linguistique+g%C3%A9n%C3%A9rale,+&ots=nqYpoyz0Rh&sig=V6Si7Ckl8YMEFfTHqBnHKTwThBU&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=De%20Saussure%2C%20F.%20(1916).%20Cours%20de%20linguistique%20g%C3%A9n%C3%A9rale%2C&f=false Fennell, C. T., & Werker, J. F. (2003). Early word learners' ability to access phonetic detail in well-known words. Language and speech, 46(2-3), 245-264. doi:10.1177/00238309030460020901

Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J., Pethick, S. J., ... & Stiles, J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the society for research in child development, i-185. doi:10.2307/1166093

Friedrich, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Lexical priming and semantic integration reflected in the event-related potential of 14-month-olds. Neuroreport, 16(6), 653-656. http://journals.lww.com/neuroreport/Abstract/2005/04250/Lexical_priming_and_semantic_integration_reflected.28.aspx

Frishberg, N. (1987). Home sign. Gallaudet encyclopedia of deaf people and deafness, 3, 128-131. https://scholar.google.bg/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=Sw1utaAAAAAJ&citation_for_view=Sw1utaAAAAAJ:Y0pCki6q_DkC

Glezer, L. S., Kim, J., Rule, J., Jiang, X., & Riesenhuber, M. (2015). Adding words to the brain's visual dictionary: novel word learning selectively sharpens orthographic representations in the VWFA. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(12), 4965-4972. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4031-14.2015

Hausser, Roland. 1989. Principles of computational morphology. Pittsburgh, PA, Carnegie Mellon University, Laboratory for Computational Linguistic, Technical report. The application:https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7dbb/02fdb2f14cf3f701e76fbf3165661197ceba.pdf

Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (Eds.). (2010). Action meets word: How children learn verbs. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.bg/books?hl=en&lr=&id=McEVDAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=Hirsh-Pasek+and+Golinkoff+(2006),+%E2%80%9CAction+meets+word:+How+children+learn+verbs.%E2%80%9D&ots=KI19ZZAWI4&sig=NBgr3jPCWuIFoS2VoyTuWzvtSgU&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Hirsh-Pasek%20and%20Golinkoff%20(2006)%2C%20%E2%80%9CAction%20meets%20word%3A%20How%20children%20learn%20verbs.%E2%80%9D&f=false

Imai, M., Kita, S., Nagumo, M., & Okada, H. (2008).Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition, 109(1), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.015

Imai, M., & Kita, S. (2014). The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 369(1651). doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0298

Laing, C. E. (2017). A perceptual advantage for onomatopoeia in early word learning: Evidence from eye-tracking. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 161, 32-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.017

Lockwood, G., Dingemanse, M., & Hagoort, P. (2016). Sound-symbolism boosts novel word learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(8), 1274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000235

MacWhinney, B., & Snow, C. (1985). The child language data exchange system. Journal of child language, 12(02), 271-295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900006449

MacWhinney, B. (2012). The CHILDES Project. Tools for analyzing talk-Electronic edition. Part 1. The CHAT transcription format. August 6, 2012. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7dbb/02fdb2f14cf3f701e76fbf3165661197ceba.pdf

Moran P. & J. Tommerdahl (2011). A case study of linguistic isolation and questions about subsequent language support and educational provision in the United Kingdom. In Patricia Sutcliff, William J. Sullivan & Arle Lommel (eds.), The Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States, LACUS Forum 36: Mechanisms of Linguistic Behavior, 229-240. Houston, TX: LACUS, 01.05.17: http://www.lacus.org/volumes/36/216_moran_p.pdf

Pinker, S. (1987). The bootstrapping problem in language acquisition. Mechanisms of language acquisition, 399-441. https://goo.gl/USrGZM

Robinson, G. A., Butterworth, B., & Cipolotti, L. (2015). “My Mind Is Doing It All”: No “Brake” to Stop Speech Generation in Jargon Aphasia. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 28(4), 229-241. doi:10.1097/WNN.0000000000000080

Slavova, V. & A. Soschen. (2015 a.). On mental representations: Language structure and meaning revised, International Journal Information theories & applications 2 (4), 316-325. http://www.foibg.com/ijita/vol22/ijita22-04-p02.pdf

Slavova, V. & A. Soschen. (2015 b.) Syntactic operations - modelling language faculty, International Journal Information theories & applications 2(4), 326-337. http://www.foibg.com/ijita/vol22/ijita22-04-p03.pdf

Slavova, V. (2016, July). Data Collection for Studying Language Acquisition. In Proc. of the 12th Annual International Conference on Computer Science and Education in Computer Science (CSECS 2016) (pp. 1-4). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Velina_Slavova/publication/316406783_DATA_COLLECTION_FOR_STUDYING_LANGUAGE_ACQUISITION/links/58fc6cb2aca2723d79d89506/DATA-COLLECTION-FOR-STUDYING-LANGUAGE-ACQUISITION.pdf

Torigoe, T., & Takei, W. (2002). A descriptive analysis of pointing and oral movements in a home sign system. Sign Language Studies, 2(3), 281-295. doi:10.1353/sls.2002.0013

Werker, J. F., Cohen, L. B., Lloyd, V. L., Casasola, M., & Stager, C. L. (1998). Acquisition of word–object associations by 14-month-old infants. Developmental psychology, 34(6), 1289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.34.6.1289



How to Cite

Slavova, V. . (2017). ON NATIVE SEMANTIC ROLES – COMPARATIVE STUDY BASED ON DATA FROM CHILD LANGUAGE ACQUISITION OF ENGLISH AND FRENCH. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 5(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5937/IJCRSEE1702001S