Examining Multimodal Literacy Skills Among EMI Teachers in Kazakhstan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2025-13-1-217-222Keywords:
English as a medium of instruction, Multimodal Literacy Scale, higher education, multimodal training, university teachersAbstract
The integration of English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI) in Kazakhstani universities necessitates effective multimodal communication in teaching. However, limited research has explored EMI instructors’ multimodal literacy—their ability to utilize verbal, visual, and textual elements to enhance instruction. This study investigates the relationship between EMI instructors’ ability to express and interpret multimodal content and their preference for multimodal communication in teaching at a Kazakhstani university. A quantitative research design was employed, utilizing a validated survey instrument to assess 120 teachers’ multimodal literacy levels in one Kazakhstani university. The collected data underwent reliability analysis, descriptive statistics, and Pearson correlation analysis to examine the relationships among multimodal expression, interpretation, and preference. The results indicate that while teachers acknowledge the value of multimodal approaches, they encounter significant challenges in integrating them effectively. Variations in internal consistency suggest that certain aspects of multimodal communication remain difficult to master. Additionally, the findings reveal that teachers who demonstrate strong multimodal interpretation skills do not necessarily prefer using such methods in teaching. These findings suggest a gap between EMI instructors’ multimodal literacy and their instructional preferences, highlighting the need for targeted faculty development programs that enhance multimodal teaching strategies.
Downloads
References
Bulut, B., Ulu, H. & Kan, A. (2015). Multimodal literacy scale: A study of validity and reliability. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 61, 45-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.61.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.61.3
Dearden, J. (2015). English as a Medium of Instuction: A growing global phenomenon. British Council Report. https://www.britishcouncil.org/education/ihe/knowledge-centre/english-language-higher-education/report-english-medium-instruction
Dermendjieva, S., Stošić, L., Dyankova, G. (2020) Meaning-centered management of the virtual educational environment in the academic training of pedagogical specialists. Yearbook of Pedagogy, (1) 73-80. Niš: Faculty of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.46630/gped.1.2020.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46630/gped.1.2020.05
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3):297-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
Custodio-Espinar, M. & López-Hernández, A. (2023). Beyond Written-Linguistic Modes of Meanings: Multimodal Representations to Extend the Range of Literacy Learning in EMI Students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14 (1), 6-19. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1401.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1401.02
Hair, J. F., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Kaiypova, F., & Kim, T.Y. (2024). Recent Advancements in English Education in the Multilingual Context of Kazakhstan. Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 24, 934-952. https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.24..202409.934 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.24..202409.934
Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203970034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203970034
Morell, T. (2018). Multimodal competence and effective interactive EMI lecturing. System, 77, 70–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.12.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.12.006
Morell, T. (2020). EMI teacher training with a multimodal and interactive approach: A new horizon for LSP specialists. Language Value, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.6035/LanguageV.2020.12.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6035/LanguageV.2020.12.4
Sutrisno, D., Abidin N.A.Z., P., Pambudi. N., Adyawati., Sallu, S (2023). Exploring The Benefits of Multimodal Literacy in English Teaching: Engaging Students Through Visual, Auditory, And Digital Modes. Global Synthesis in Education Journal, (2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.61667/xh184f41 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61667/xh184f41
Tai, K. W. H., & Wei, L. (2024). Mobilising multilingual and multimodal resources for facilitating knowledge construction: implications for researching translanguaging and multimodality in CLIL classroom context. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2024.2442525 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2024.2442525
Tasevska, D., Ivanov, I. (2022). Prouchvane na naglasite za obrazovatelno vzaimodeĭstvie v digitalna sreda v situatsiya na COVID-19. [Study of Attitudes for Educational Interaction in a Digital Environment in a COVID-19 Situation]. Psychological Thought, (15)1, 29-52. https://doi.org/10.37708/psyct.v15i1.610 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37708/psyct.v15i1.610
Tulepova, S., Bekturova, M., Gaipov, D., Butt, S. (2024) Investigating English medium instruction provision in a Kazakhstani university: the ideals and realities of EMI learning. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 12(2), pp. 433-444. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP240428035T DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP240428035T
Walsh, M. (2010). Multimodal literacy: What does it mean for classroom practice? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 33(3), 211-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651836
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Madina Bekturova, Davronzhon Gaipov, Gergana Dyankova, Saule Tulepova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Metrics
Plaudit
Accepted 2025-04-13
Published 2025-04-29