Designing Digital Multimodal Resources for the Kindergarten: From Intuition to Awareness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2024-12-3-657-667Keywords:
evaluation of multimodal digital resources for educational purposes, meaning-making as design, multimodal digital ensemble, pre-service kindergarten teachers’ trainingAbstract
The study adapts McNeill and Robin’s (2012) evaluation system for digital story design to identify pre-service kindergarten teachers’ perceptions of its process and product aspect. Conducted within the course Pedagogy of Construction and Technology, the empirical study involves self-, peer, and expert evaluation of custom-designed multimodal educational digital ensembles. Significant differences across these evaluation axes emerge in the indicators clarity and cohesion, the capacity of the resource to render symbolic/metaphorical meanings, and students’ consideration of the audience’s age-related capabilities. Unlike students, experts manifest a more pronounced criticism, because their evaluation draws on their experience and perception of the applicability of the resources. To contextualize the three axes of evaluation, focus group discussions were conducted exploring students’ intentions related to goal setting, preparation, the author’s presence, and the multimodal modes of expression. A lack of specialized technological knowledge was established for effective use of multimedia software. Inconsistencies in students’ perception of the storyboarding process were also identified, along with an orientation to the audience’s motivation rather than to their age-related characteristics. These findings highlight the need for a systematic design of university courses in educational multimodal digital design for Education majors.
Downloads
References
Anderson, D. (2003). Prosumer approaches to new media composition: Consumption and production in continuum. Kairos, A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology & Pedagogy, 8(1). Available at http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/8.1/. Accessed 10 October 2022.
Ball, C. E. (2012). Assessing scholarly multimedia: A rhetorical genre studies approach. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21(1), 61-77. http://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2012.626390 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2012.626390
Becker, C., & Blell, G. (2018). Multimedia narratives – digital storytelling and multiliteracies. International Journal of English Studies, 29(1), 129-143. https://angl.winter-verlag.de/article/angl/2018/1/11
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2015). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687537
Cappello, M. (2019). Reflections of identity in multimodal projects: teacher education in the Pacific. Issues in Teacher Education, 28(1), 6–20.
Cazden, C., Cope, B., Fairclough, N., Gee, J., Kalantzis, M., Kress, G., ... & Nakata, M. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard educational review, 66(1), 60-92. http://vassarliteracy.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/9012261/Pedagogy%20of%20Multiliteracies_New%20London%20Group.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
Demirbag, M., & Gunel, M. (2014). Integrating Argument-Based Science Inquiry with Modal Representations: Impact on Science Achievement, Argumentation, and Writing Skills. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(1), 386-391. https://acikerisim.uludag.edu.tr/server/api/core/bitstreams/f76f65a6-af96-4f37-af4b-2e4ab8020477/content
Godhe, A. L., Magnusson, P., & Hashemi, S. S. (2020). Adequate digital competence: Exploring revisions in the Swedish national curriculum. Educare, (2), 74-91. http://doi.org/10.24834/educare.2020.2.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24834/educare.2020.2.4
Gregori-Signes, C. (2014). Digital storytelling and multimodal literacy in education. Porta Linguarum (22), 237–250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.53745
Halliday, M. A. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed). London: Routledge.
Ivarsson, J., Linderoth, J., & Säljö, R. (2009). Representations in practices. A socio-cultural approach to multimodality in reasoning. In C Jewitt (ed). Routlage handbook of multimodal analysis. London: Routledge.
Jewitt, C. (Ed.). (2009). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (p. 340). London: Routledge.
Johnson, L. L., & Smagorinsky, P. (2014). Writing remixed: Mapping the multimodal composition of one preservice English Education teacher. In Exploring multimodal composition and digital writing (263-281). IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4345-1.ch016
Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2008). Language education and multiliteracies. In S May & NH Nornberger (eds). Encyclopedia of language and education (Vol. 1). Language policy and political issues in education. Boston: Springer Science.
Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., Chan, E., & Dalley-Trim, L. (2012). Literacies Cambridge University Press. New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139196581
Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: a social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routlage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203970034
Kuhn, V. (2008). The components of scholarly multimedia. From gallery to webtext [Webtext compilation]. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 12(3). http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/12.3/topoi/gallery/index.html. Accessed 10 October 2022.
Kuhn, V., Johnson, D. J., & Lopez, D. (2010). Speaking with students: Profiles in digital pedagogy. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 14(2). http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/14.2/interviews/kuhn/index.html. Accessed 10 October 2022.
Magnusson, P., & Godhe, A. L. (2019). Multimodality in language education: Implications for teaching. Designs for learning, 11(1), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.127
Mills, K. A., & Unsworth, L. (2018). iP ad animations: powerful multimodal practices for adolescent literacy and emotional language. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 61(6), 609-620. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.717 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.717
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610
Palmeri, J. (2012). Remixing composition: A history of multimodal writing pedagogy. SIU Press.
Paniagua, A., & Istance, D. (2018). Teachers as Designers of Learning Environments: The Importance of Innovative Pedagogies. ducational Research and Innovation, 17-42, Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264085374-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264085374-en
Shinas, V. H., & Wen, H. (2022). Preparing teacher candidates to implement digital storytelling. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100079
Silvers, P., Shorey, M., & Crafton, L. (2010). Critical literacy in a primary multiliteracies classroom: The hurricane group. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10(4), 379-409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798410382354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798410382354
Vasudevan, L., Schultz, K., & Bateman, J. (2010). Rethinking composing in a digital age: Authoring literate identities through multimodal storytelling. Written communication, 27(4), 442-468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088310378217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088310378217
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nikolay Tsankov, Milena Levunlieva

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Metrics
Plaudit
Accepted 2024-12-22
Published 2024-12-30