RESEARCH OF COGNITIVE EXCHANGE SPECIFICS IN TEACHERS ACADEMIC TRAINING

Authors

  • Gergana Dyankova Faculty of Pedagogy, South-West University “Neofit Rilski”, Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1803001D

Keywords:

higher pedagogical education, learning environment, cognitive exchange, proactivity

Abstract

The paper discusses the transformation of the educational environment issues of university pedagogical subjects. The ideas of constructivism and connectivity, of moral philosophy and social psychology, are fundamental. By defining the content parameters of the educational environment in their dichotomous condition: reproducibility – proactivity; customization – dialogue; individualization – differentiation, this research highlights the specific characteristics of the learning process, which determine the qualitative cognitive exchange in the academic training of pedagogical subjects. A compound research is conducted of the learning by registering the self-assessment and the parallel-reflecting assessment of the students in the pedagogical specialties. The analysis of the results emphasizes the urgent need to change the traditionally established patterns in the organization of the teaching process in the higher pedagogical education, the application of student-oriented practices to stimulate self-organization in learning, the development of proactive technology incorporating the characteristics of formal and nonformal education in a networked and technological environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Covey, S. (2010). Sedemte navika na visoko efektivnite hora [The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People] Publ. Kibea, Sofia.

Dermendjieva, S. (2006). Poznavatelno vzaimodejstvie v mulitmediynata sreda i transformacia na detskata igra, [Cognitive interaction in a multimedia environment and transformation of children’s play] Sofia, p. 35.

Dewey, J. (1997) Psihologia i pedagogika mishlenia [Psychology and pedagogy of thinking], Moskow.

Dimitrov, D. (2012). Obogatyavashtoto pedagogichesko vzaimodejstvie v preduchilishtna vuzrast [Enriching pedagogical interaction at pre-school age] P. Art, Sofia, p.108.

Florida, R. (2017). The new urban crisis: How our cities are increasing inequality, deepening segregation, and failing the middle class—And what we can do about it. Basic Books.

Frankl, V. (2000). Man’s Search for Ultimate Meaning. New York: Basic Books.

Isaacson, W. (2014). The innovators. Simon &Schuster. 528.

Ivanov, I. (2011). Po putya kum postmodernata didaktika // Obuchenieto kato put kum obrazovanieto. [On the way to postmodern didactics. // Education as a way to education.] A collection of materials for the 60th anniversary of Professor Plamen Radev, p. 169-184. Retrieved from: https://www.ivanpivanov.com/uploads/sources/99_Po-pytq-kam-postmodernata-didactika.pdf

John, D. (1997). Psihologia i pedagogika mishlenia [Psychology and pedagogy of thinking], Moskow.

Laitman, М. & Ulyanov, А. (2011). Psihologia integralnogo soobshtestva (metodika integranogo vospitania). [Psychology of the integral community (the method of integral education)] Publ. Institute for Advanced Studies, Moscow.

Landry, C. (2005). Kreativnuy gorod. [The creative city], Moscow “Classics-21”.

Lewin, K. (1980). Topologia i teoria poliya. Hrestomatia po istorii psihologii, [Topology and field theory. Reader on the history of psychology] Ed. P. Ya. Galperin, A. N. Zhdan, Moscow: Moscow State University.

Mavrodieva, M. (2009). Sazdavane na efektivna sreda za prepodavane i uchene. Rezultati ot Mejdunarodnoto izsledvane za prepodawane i uchene TALIS na Organizaciyata za ikonomichesko satrudnichestvo i razvitie. [Creating an effective environment for teaching and learning. Results of the TALIS International Study on Teaching and Learning of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development], Publ. CKOKO, p. 31.

Milenkova, V., Peicheva, D., & Marinov, M. (2018). Towards defining media socialization as a basis for digital society. International Journal Of Cognitive Research In Science, Engineering And Education (IJCRSEE), 6(2), 21-32. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1802021M

Mirascieva, Sn. & Koseva, D. (2018). Modeling of perspective concepts in education – planning and management, Contemporary education – condition, challenges and perspective, “Goce Delcev” University, Stip, Macedonia, p. 348-355.

Piaget, J. (1992). Psihologia intelekta. Logika I psihologia. [Psychology of the intellect. Logic and psychology.] Moskow.

Robinson, К. & Aronika, L. (2017). Kreativnite uchilishta. Revoluyciata koyato preobraziava obrazovanieto. [Creative Schools: Revolutionizing Education from the Ground]. RAABE, Sofia.

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International journal of instructional technology & distance learning. Ganuary, 2(1) p. 3-10. Retrieved from: http://itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm

Stošić, L. & Stošić, I. (2013). Diffusion of innovation in modern school. International Journal Of Cognitive Research In Science, Engineering And Education, 1(1), Retrieved from: https://ijcrsee.com/index.php/IJCRSEE/article/view/144

Tasevska, D., Kaleynska, T., Dyankova, G. (2015). Mladejko liderstvo – naruchnik za profesionalisti [Youth Leadership - A Handbook for Professionals] EIC, Veliko Tarnovo, p. 40.

Vardareva, V., Pashova, A. (2012). Specifika na magisturskata programa Interkulutrno obrazovanie ili za preodolyavaneto na informacionniyat model na obuchenie v universiteta, [The specificity of the masters`program Intercultural education or for overcoming the information model for training at the university.] Educational technologies. Yearbook of Shumen University “Ep. K. Preslavski” т. XVI D, p. 53-61.

Vygotsky, L. (2004). Psihologia razvitia rebenka, [Child developmental psychology], Moskow.

Yasvin, V. (2001). Obrazovatelnaya sreda ot modelirovania k preotkrivaniuy. [Educational environment from modeling to design] Publ. Meaning. Moscow.

Zakon za vissheto obrazovanie, [Higher Education] Act-Retrieved from: https://lex.bg/en/laws/ldoc/2133647361

Downloads

Published

2018-12-20

How to Cite

Dyankova, G. . (2018). RESEARCH OF COGNITIVE EXCHANGE SPECIFICS IN TEACHERS ACADEMIC TRAINING. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 6(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1803001D

Metrics

Plaudit